User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 34

Thread: Economics is Fun, Part 10: Taxation

  1. #11
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,155, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497420
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,731
    Points
    863,155
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,642
    Thanked 148,430x in 94,898 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Or perhaps the right to vote is attached to simply paying federal income taxes. That would eliminate ~50% of the vote off the top. Then we might get sensible government.

  2. #12
    Original Ranter
    Points: 112,719, Level: 81
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 931
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    SocialTagger Second Class50000 Experience PointsYour first GroupVeteran
    Conley's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    7413
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    22,473
    Points
    112,719
    Level
    81
    Thanks Given
    4,582
    Thanked 2,511x in 2,019 Posts
    Mentioned
    238 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Captain Obvious View Post
    I'm partly on board with defensive spending cuts but it's the wars that are costing us a $#@!load. We cannot and should not slam the breaks on defensive spending - and I would include the space program in that mix also, which we've put the parking break on seemingly.
    We need to cut defense spending. Just like all other government budgets, and especially because this one is a 'golden cow' it has become bloated and obese. No need to gash it, but it's time to trim some of the fat. Bringing our troops home would help this situation and have a lot more benefits as well.

  3. #13
    Points: 667,668, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433838
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    198,077
    Points
    667,668
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    32,179
    Thanked 81,427x in 54,993 Posts
    Mentioned
    2013 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    Or perhaps the right to vote is attached to simply paying federal income taxes. That would eliminate ~50% of the vote off the top. Then we might get sensible government.
    Actually the 50% not paying taxes is 50% of population total. Still, if liberals want to tax the rich, a good compromise would be weighing votes proportional to amount of taxes you pay.

  4. #14
    Original Ranter
    Points: 112,719, Level: 81
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 931
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    SocialTagger Second Class50000 Experience PointsYour first GroupVeteran
    Conley's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    7413
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    22,473
    Points
    112,719
    Level
    81
    Thanks Given
    4,582
    Thanked 2,511x in 2,019 Posts
    Mentioned
    238 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    Actually the 50% not paying taxes is 50% of population total. Still, if liberals want to tax the rich, a good compromise would be weighing votes proportional to amount of taxes you pay.
    I say just close the loopholes. Everyone making over a certain amount of money pays a flat tax. Problem solved.

  5. #15
    Points: 667,668, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433838
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    198,077
    Points
    667,668
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    32,179
    Thanked 81,427x in 54,993 Posts
    Mentioned
    2013 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    And better would be a consumption tax like the Fair Tax, imo.

  6. #16
    Original Ranter
    Points: 112,719, Level: 81
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 931
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    SocialTagger Second Class50000 Experience PointsYour first GroupVeteran
    Conley's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    7413
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    22,473
    Points
    112,719
    Level
    81
    Thanks Given
    4,582
    Thanked 2,511x in 2,019 Posts
    Mentioned
    238 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    And better would be a consumption tax like the Fair Tax, imo.
    I think I agree, but if we discourage spending by adding to consumption taxes, won't that hurt the economy?

  7. #17
    Points: 667,668, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433838
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    198,077
    Points
    667,668
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    32,179
    Thanked 81,427x in 54,993 Posts
    Mentioned
    2013 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Less than disincentivising earning an income. I think.

  8. #18
    Original Ranter
    Points: 112,719, Level: 81
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 931
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    SocialTagger Second Class50000 Experience PointsYour first GroupVeteran
    Conley's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    7413
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    22,473
    Points
    112,719
    Level
    81
    Thanks Given
    4,582
    Thanked 2,511x in 2,019 Posts
    Mentioned
    238 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    Less than disincentivising earning an income. I think.
    I hear you, but I'm thinking that the current tax rate doesn't discourage income growth the way a consumption tax would discourage consumption. For example, if you charge a 20% tax on buying a car, making it go from say 20k to 24k, people may well balk and begin looking for other places to buy the car cheaper. But applying that same 20% tax to income isn't going to make someone work less, at least IMO. I would prefer a consumption tax to income tax, but that's mostly because I consume very little. I don't know the economic repercussions and I think even those who claim they definitely do would see unexpected consequences.

  9. #19
    Points: 667,668, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433838
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    198,077
    Points
    667,668
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    32,179
    Thanked 81,427x in 54,993 Posts
    Mentioned
    2013 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Right, but taking away 20-30% of my paycheck already means I have less to spend. If I go up much in pay I go up another tax bracket.

  10. #20
    Original Ranter
    Points: 112,719, Level: 81
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 931
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    SocialTagger Second Class50000 Experience PointsYour first GroupVeteran
    Conley's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    7413
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    22,473
    Points
    112,719
    Level
    81
    Thanks Given
    4,582
    Thanked 2,511x in 2,019 Posts
    Mentioned
    238 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    Right, but taking away 20-30% of my paycheck already means I have less to spend. If I go up much in pay I go up another tax bracket.
    But does anyone turn down a salary increase on such a basis?

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts