Birfer Lawyer Phillip Berg Suspended From Practice

[nathanbforrest45]

no. read with comprehension instead of doing the let's derail another of jilian's threads dance.

Why did you refer to him as "birfer" if you weren't implying that had something to do with it?

[jillian]

Why did you refer to him as "birfer" if you weren't implying that had something to do with it?

because you wouldn't know who he is otherwise. and no one would be talking about the braindead, and now happily suspended, creep.

i hope that helps.

now why do you care?

[jillian]

i think he was fined $10,000 for frivolous filings...

i know his buddy orly was.

that would have a little something to do with how the state bar viewed him.

[Mainecoons]

because you wouldn't know who he is otherwise. and no one would be talking about the braindead, and now happily suspended, creep.

i hope that helps.

now why do you care?

Believe it or not, not everyone is as allergic to knowledge and looking things up as you are. Don't project your intellectual laziness on others.

If he is of such inconsequence, why did you even bother to start this thread?

I notice you've studiously avoided the fact that he is one of yours. And probably had done a lot more actual work for the Democratic Party than you ever dreamed of.

Not to mention the fact that his transgression has nothing to do with his courage in pointing out that Obama's origins had a lot of holes in them.

And they still do.

[Kalkin]

One of yours, Jillian. No doubt you are forgetting that it was Democrats, including Hillary's campaign, who raised the whole question about Obama's funny looking background.

Glad to see you ridiculing your own for a change.

Shrillary is a Birfer? Lol.

[nic34]

Not to mention the fact that his transgression has nothing to do with his courage in pointing out that Obama's origins had a lot of holes in them.

And they still do.

Link maybe?

[Chris]

i think he was fined $10,000 for frivolous filings...

i know his buddy orly was.

that would have a little something to do with how the state bar viewed him.

More precisely, from my earlier link:

According to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s disciplinary board, Mr. Berg was derelict in representing the wife of a Hell’s Angel, who had hired him to sue the Lancaster, Pa. police over an allegedly warrantless search and seizure of her home while investigating her husband’s stabbing of a rival motorcycle gang member.

The board found that Mr. Berg failed to answer a motion to dismiss filed by the police defendants, prompting a federal judge to throw out the suit. Mr. Berg dissembled when his client would inquire about progress in the case, the board found, until 2009, when she discovered through an Internet search that the suit had been dismissed years earlier.

The board reported that Mr. Berg was uncooperative with the disciplinary process, raising “frivolous issues” and pursuing “baseless motions that wasted the time and energy” of court officials. While he ultimately admitted violating several rules of professional conduct, Mr. Berg “did not apologize to [the client] but sought to justify his conduct by continually denigrating the merits of the case.”

Moreover, Mr. Berg “did not demonstrate genuine remorse for his misconduct,” the board said, noting that he previously had been disciplined for other rule violations, including “commingling personal funds” with those of his clients and neglecting earlier cases.

Democrats.

[Chris]

Link maybe?

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2014/01/29/...valettop_email

[Mainecoons]

Link maybe?

Been discussed endlessly here. I'm sure you didn't read the links where real computer experts analyzed the internet image of the BC and pronounced it altered and I'm sure you won't read them this time either.