User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Economics is Fun, Part 11: Competition

  1. #1
    Points: 665,213, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 90.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433307
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    197,542
    Points
    665,213
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    31,981
    Thanked 80,896x in 54,714 Posts
    Mentioned
    2011 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Economics is Fun, Part 11: Competition

    Trying to catch up with his latest releases! This is an interesting topic.


  2. #2
    Original Ranter
    Points: 112,719, Level: 81
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 931
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    SocialTagger Second Class50000 Experience PointsYour first GroupVeteran
    Conley's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    7413
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    22,473
    Points
    112,719
    Level
    81
    Thanks Given
    4,582
    Thanked 2,511x in 2,019 Posts
    Mentioned
    238 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    The sun never shines in London...each time I see a new video the background is even more gloomy than the last one.

    On topic, great video and it underscores the importance of preserving competition. If the government prevents competition, then a company can set prices at whatever they want. I worry about state sponsored monopolies in this country ((say cable television). With all the corporate money in politics these days I believe it's more of a risk than ever.

  3. #3
    Original Ranter
    Points: 858,837, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 92.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    496507
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    241,624
    Points
    858,837
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,194
    Thanked 147,517x in 94,378 Posts
    Mentioned
    2552 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Good video.

    The rational behind monopolies in the utilities area was that it would be economic waste to have two or more companies expend the resources to provide utilities to the same geographic area. That is why government stepped in to negotiate a fair price for the service. Of course if the government does a poor job negotiating or allows the utility provider to get away with substandard service, then we have a problem.

  4. #4
    Points: 665,213, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 90.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433307
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    197,542
    Points
    665,213
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    31,981
    Thanked 80,896x in 54,714 Posts
    Mentioned
    2011 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    But such monopolies are foreign to the Invisible Hand.

  5. #5
    Points: 12,573, Level: 26
    Level completed: 92%, Points required for next Level: 77
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran10000 Experience Points
    RollingWave's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    3456
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    981
    Points
    12,573
    Level
    26
    Thanks Given
    105
    Thanked 367x in 292 Posts
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    Good video.

    The rational behind monopolies in the utilities area was that it would be economic waste to have two or more companies expend the resources to provide utilities to the same geographic area. That is why government stepped in to negotiate a fair price for the service. Of course if the government does a poor job negotiating or allows the utility provider to get away with substandard service, then we have a problem.
    Which tends to be why a lot of country simply nationalize such services....

    There is also the prolem of say... you only have one dam in the area, if that dam is owned by a company how in the world is another one suppose to compete with them to begin with? and I'm fairly sure even the most free-market oriented folks would agree that private companies can't just dam whereever they like.

    Alot of other such problems exist, in taiwan for example there's basically only one rail way going around the whole island, which kinda makes it difficult to have more than 1 train service companies. the US have gotten around this somewhat because they are large enough and have many seperated railways.

    Though the nationalization also brings the problem the other way around, the government have surpressed he rate on the train service for so long and have ran a lot of rather unprofitable routs that the train company is in fact losing a lot of money, which goes on the taxpayers eventually. though the alternative doesn't seem a whole lot better. for example, Greece is now forced to privatize their trains, and unsurprisingly there's no bidders that want to get into the hellhole that is Greece right now, so the Greeks are looking at no train service at all soon.

  6. #6
    Original Ranter
    Points: 858,837, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 92.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    496507
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    241,624
    Points
    858,837
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,194
    Thanked 147,517x in 94,378 Posts
    Mentioned
    2552 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    But such monopolies are foreign to the Invisible Hand.
    Of course.

    And it is not practical for 2 dozen businesses to load up the landscape with their own telephone poles and wires. Not they they could afford it if they wanted to.

    That is why we allow monopolies.

  7. #7
    Original Ranter
    Points: 858,837, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 92.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    496507
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    241,624
    Points
    858,837
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,194
    Thanked 147,517x in 94,378 Posts
    Mentioned
    2552 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by RollingWave View Post
    Which tends to be why a lot of country simply nationalize such services....

    There is also the prolem of say... you only have one dam in the area, if that dam is owned by a company how in the world is another one suppose to compete with them to begin with? and I'm fairly sure even the most free-market oriented folks would agree that private companies can't just dam whereever they like.

    Alot of other such problems exist, in taiwan for example there's basically only one rail way going around the whole island, which kinda makes it difficult to have more than 1 train service companies. the US have gotten around this somewhat because they are large enough and have many seperated railways.

    Though the nationalization also brings the problem the other way around, the government have surpressed he rate on the train service for so long and have ran a lot of rather unprofitable routs that the train company is in fact losing a lot of money, which goes on the taxpayers eventually. though the alternative doesn't seem a whole lot better. for example, Greece is now forced to privatize their trains, and unsurprisingly there's no bidders that want to get into the hellhole that is Greece right now, so the Greeks are looking at no train service at all soon.

    I generally agree with you on this point. The free market cannot solve all issues.

  8. #8
    Points: 665,213, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 90.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433307
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    197,542
    Points
    665,213
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    31,981
    Thanked 80,896x in 54,714 Posts
    Mentioned
    2011 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    Of course.

    And it is not practical for 2 dozen businesses to load up the landscape with their own telephone poles and wires. Not they they could afford it if they wanted to.

    That is why we allow monopolies.
    The lines are shared. Only one line comes to the house but I could select among any number of telephony services--I chose actually to go digital and get phone service via cable. No need for monopolies at all.

  9. #9
    Points: 665,213, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 90.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433307
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    197,542
    Points
    665,213
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    31,981
    Thanked 80,896x in 54,714 Posts
    Mentioned
    2011 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Traditionally natural resources like rivers, air, fisheries, etc are held to be shared as the commons. Tragedy of the commons problems like you two are discussing are sometimes worked out by people, in the free market simply by recognizing the need to cooperate as much as compete, and sometimes not worked out, and government can be a cause of such problems.

  10. #10
    Original Ranter
    Points: 858,837, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 92.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    496507
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    241,624
    Points
    858,837
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,194
    Thanked 147,517x in 94,378 Posts
    Mentioned
    2552 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    The lines are shared. Only one line comes to the house but I could select among any number of telephony services--I chose actually to go digital and get phone service via cable. No need for monopolies at all.
    Lines are shared today. I don't believe that was the case in the past. I agree that today tech is making the need for monopolies less.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts