User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals

  1. #11
    Points: 8,845, Level: 22
    Level completed: 50%, Points required for next Level: 405
    Overall activity: 39.0%
    Achievements:
    5000 Experience Points1 year registered
    Mr. Freeze's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    3557
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1,487
    Points
    8,845
    Level
    22
    Thanks Given
    300
    Thanked 672x in 472 Posts
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Common Sense View Post
    Us leftists are all just a bunch of Satan worshipers...
    Don't do that. If I choose to call you a leftist and a satan worshiper, I will. Trust me. I have no problem saying what I mean.
    Industry is under attack from a small subversive group of namby-pamby environmentalist weirdos! ~ Sam the Eagle

  2. #12
    Points: 45,690, Level: 52
    Level completed: 25%, Points required for next Level: 1,360
    Overall activity: 28.0%
    Achievements:
    Created Album picturesYour first GroupTagger First ClassSocial50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Refugee's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    38822
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    4,482
    Points
    45,690
    Level
    52
    Thanks Given
    644
    Thanked 2,216x in 1,557 Posts
    Mentioned
    139 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think that generally Europeans have a much clearer idea of what Obama and his friends really are. Leaving aside GA’s predictable remarks, we are not fooled by, ‘fundamentally changing America’ meaning anything other than socialism when said by a Marxist, or believing that a Democrat could never also be a communist. They’re a play on definitions and we can spot them a mile off. We also know that ‘Progressivism’ is cultural Marxism, not to be confused with a scientific definition of human progress.

    The Obama’s, the European Commissioners and our own European politicians are experts in disguising themselves with double speak terms, but their policies give them away. They’re taught these techniques and it’s why it’s so difficult to pin them down; they don’t tell lies, (too easy to be caught out), they just don’t tell the truth. They are experts in giving prepared speeches and if you were asked later what they said, you wouldn’t really have a clue as they didn’t actually say anything of value, but it sounded nice.

    It’s why socialized healthcare becomes the Affordable Health Care Act, or mass welfare according to Pelosi is good for the economy and produces employment. How can you argue that producing employment is wrong? Or that mass immigration is good for the economy and so becomes something that’s needed . . . . . it’s all designed to confuse and I’m sorry, but they’re running rings around the average American. These people are the sons and daughters of the earlier radicals bringing you the same message of destroying society, but using a more subtle version than that of a bloody revolution to do it.

    It’s not a secret, these people even write books on how to do it and you can take your pick; The Communist Manifesto, The Thoughts of Chairman Mao, The Anarchist Cookbook . . . . . I suspect ‘The Rules for Radicals’ is simply an update version of how to destroy society using psychology instead of firing squads. Start with a huge welfare government dependent population, an increasingly militarized police force, FEMA camps and start working towards it from there.








  3. #13
    Points: 36,273, Level: 46
    Level completed: 55%, Points required for next Level: 677
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Social25000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Libhater's Avatar Banned
    Karma
    6316
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Segregated Community
    Posts
    5,323
    Points
    36,273
    Level
    46
    Thanks Given
    1,301
    Thanked 1,036x in 767 Posts
    Mentioned
    114 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Refugee View Post

    The Communist Manifesto, The Thoughts of Chairman Mao, The Anarchist Cookbook . . . . . I suspect ‘The Rules for Radicals’ is simply an update version of how to destroy society using psychology instead of firing squads. Start with a huge welfare government dependent population, an increasingly militarized police force, FEMA camps and start working towards it from there.
    Lest anyone forgets the Cloward/Piven handbook that ties in beautifully with Alinsky's Rules for Radicals in how to bring our nation's economy to its knees so that the people will forever be indebted to the statist/collectivist government from cradle to grave, and to where production and or growth comes to a standstill.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Single Sign On provided by vBSSO