She let him remove her panties and 45 days later cried rape

[Common Sense]

Common Sense rushed in to change the topic. Damn, that dude is fast.

Read the whole article by Will.

He uses actual figures. The left has this issue as part of their agenda. They act as if they care about girls in college but don't prove it when dealing with abortion.

How did I change the topic?

Abortion? Now who's changing the topic?

[Bob]

That's a bit of a simplification. I stated why I thought he was full of $#@!.

The left can and does do plenty wrong. They spend too much, are overly PC etc etc...

What happens here is that I'm confronted with some pretty far right $#@! that pushes me to counter it. That makes me appear far more left than I actually am.

Put in a nutshell

What exactly to you think Will did that you find fault with?

[Common Sense]

Put in a nutshell

What exactly to you think Will did that you find fault with?

Trivializing sexual assault. Insulting victims by saying they covet their victim hood.

Gotta run to a meeting...I'll catch up later.

[sachem]

Bob, freedom of speech only applies when the government does the censoring. Or tries to.

George had his say. People can respond anyway they like. Legally, of course.

I used to read George regularly back when he wrote for Newsweek. I always enjoyed his stuff about baseball and when he wrote about his son with Down's Syndrome.

[Guerilla]

I'll say she was probably taken advantage of. And that's wrong, too many guys try to take advantage of women or know they can with some innocent girl, so they do it. Someone should beat the $#@! out of guys who take advantage of weak women that way, but it wasn't rape. She's just mad at herself for not trying harder and just letting it happen.

[1751_Texan]

It is clear to me that to Common Sense, the left can do no wrong, nor Republicans do any right things.

So the boy was a Republican and the girl was a Democrat?

[Cthulhu]

This is on the left's agenda. George Will penned an article published June 7, 2014 that has the left calling for Will to lose his job. I will give you the link so you can read his entire article.

http://nypost.com/2014/06/07/colleges-mad-with-political-correctness-over-campus-rapes/

Apparently freedom of speech only applies when the left speaks.


"Consider the supposed campus epidemic of rape, aka “sexual assault.” Herewith, a Philadelphia magazine report about Swarthmore College, where in 2013 a student “was in her room with a guy with whom she’d been hooking up for three months”:“They’d now decided — mutually, she thought — just to be friends. When he ended up falling asleep on her bed, she changed into pajamas and climbed in next to him. Soon, he was putting his arm around her and taking off her clothes. ‘I basically said, “No, I don’t want to have sex with you.” And then he said, “OK, that’s fine” and stopped…And then he started again a few minutes later, taking off my panties, taking off his boxers. I just kind of laid there and didn’t do anything — I had already said no. I was just tired and wanted to go to bed. I let him finish. I pulled my panties back on and went to sleep.”Six weeks later, the woman reported that she had been raped.Now the Obama administration is riding to the rescue of “sexual assault” victims. It vows to excavate equities from the ambiguities of the hookup culture, this $#@!tail of hormones, alcohol and the faux sophistication of today’s prolonged adolescence of especially privileged young adults.The administration’s crucial and contradictory statistics are validated the usual way, by official repetition; Joe Biden has been heard from. The statistics are: One in five women is sexually assaulted while in college, and only 12% of assaults are reported. Simple arithmetic demonstrates that if the 12% reporting rate is correct, the 20% assault rate is preposterous.Mark Perry of the American Enterprise Institute notes, for example, that in the four years 2009-12 there were 98 reported sexual assaults at Ohio State. That would be 12% of 817 total out of a female student population of approximately 28,000, for a sexual assault rate of about 2.9% — too high but nowhere near 20%.Department of Education lawyers disregard pesky arithmetic and elementary due process. Threatening to withdraw federal funding, DOE mandates adoption of a minimal “preponderance of the evidence” standard when adjudicating sexual assault charges between males and the female “survivors” — note the language of prejudgment.Combine this with capacious definitions of sexual assault that can include not only forcible sexual penetration but also nonconsensual touching. Then add the doctrine that the consent of a female who has been drinking might not protect a male from being found guilty of rape. Then comes costly litigation against institutions that have denied due process to males they accuse of what society considers serious felonies."

Only important part in the entire paragraph. The other important part is the utter lack of injuries or signs of struggle. Granted, the guy was a tool. But who lets someone take off their underwear and 'let's them finish'?

People who have actually been forced, with injuries, threats to loved ones, or with drugs, should slap this girl back into reality. Or buy her a plane ticket to South Africa. She'll learn the difference right quick.

[sachem]

Women make false claims of rape. It sucks, but it is true. Does this absolve all the real rapists. No. Do women need to have "injuries" to be considered raped? No. And often women are advised not to fight back.

[Cthulhu]

Women make false claims of rape. It sucks, but it is true. Does this absolve all the real rapists. No. Do women need to have "injuries" to be considered raped? No. And often women are advised not to fight back.

This is terrible advice might I add.

[sachem]

This is terrible advice might I add.

Not if it keeps you alive. But I'm not an expert.