Or rather, a liberal elite
Or rather, a liberal elite
Whoever criticizes capitalism, while approving immigration, whose working class is its first victim, had better shut up. Whoever criticizes immigration, while remaining silent about capitalism, should do the same.
~Alain de Benoist
Seems like BO is trying to make sure there is a broad international consensus before he acts. Too bad he doesn't wait for a broad consensus when it comes to domestic affairs. Anyway, I'm not sure how this makes US actions US actions any more legitimate. Because Europe agrees?
Whoever criticizes capitalism, while approving immigration, whose working class is its first victim, had better shut up. Whoever criticizes immigration, while remaining silent about capitalism, should do the same.
~Alain de Benoist
Really...and after France's little stunt with Libya, do we really want Europe dictating US foreign policy? Not that we ever did, but if we're not going to learn from that cluster then there's no hope. :-\
Whoever criticizes capitalism, while approving immigration, whose working class is its first victim, had better shut up. Whoever criticizes immigration, while remaining silent about capitalism, should do the same.
~Alain de Benoist
It seems to me that BO thinks that an international consensus of some kind legitimizes US actions. What I'm saying is that a consensus of sorts makes BO believe that 1) it's in our interest as a world leader and 2) it's also the morally right thing to do. I thin that's very naive.
Whoever criticizes capitalism, while approving immigration, whose working class is its first victim, had better shut up. Whoever criticizes immigration, while remaining silent about capitalism, should do the same.
~Alain de Benoist
IOW, the international community is fed up with nation X so the US should take the lead in condemning nation X.
Whoever criticizes capitalism, while approving immigration, whose working class is its first victim, had better shut up. Whoever criticizes immigration, while remaining silent about capitalism, should do the same.
~Alain de Benoist
Yes the Brits are calling for no such jumping like they did with libya. Which is more than likely the only reason why. Well that and being off into the Congo and the avrican Continent that is.....which is why I also put the thread up on sanctions and bans.
Still is the US words strong or weak when spoken? Or are we involving ourselves all due to the Sunni being attacked. While I am sure that their religon does not prevent them from killing others of their own faith. Is the UN words strong or weak. Russia and China wont freeze Assads assets. Probably a few others. But why would he want to leave in the first place. No sense in allowing others to pick him up so they can lay more pressure on his regime.
Not to mention they know Syria's Army is loyal to the Syrians and the Assad Regime.
History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~
why not protect people? america is for democracy america inspires these revolution
i am the hellraiser!