Originally Posted by Kurmugeon
Windows Paint. :-)
It's yours to use freely. Your ideas.
It's interesting and no tt so complex after all.
Awards:
Senior Member
Windows Paint. :-)
It's yours to use freely. Your ideas.
It's interesting and no tt so complex after all.
Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire. ― Gustav Mahler
Senior Member
Here is an explanation which I gave on another forum on this topic. It may shed some light on why I think this is an interesting concept.
Birds of a Feather... in a Democracy, that means winning an election....
Is it distance between points or angle? Why does either represent the number of people affected?
...
If you have a diagonal line, you're likely to have unconventional political views, which means you'll likely have a much smaller base, and not achieve high office... unless you've got a Chicago Voter Fraud Machine.
Still, a Diagonal Line, probably means a fresh idea, which sometimes is just what everyone is looking for, especially when the establishment is failing.
Again, the concept of this political model is to get outside of the stereo typed and worn out Left<---->Right linear
model, and start seeing Politics in 3+ dimensions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's another way to look at it. This example examines the "Distance" Aspect of the model.
"Desparate times make for strange bedfellows."
The tool is to find areas where people have fundamentally the same outlook on life, and goals to achieve a similar
political outcome, but just don't know it.
So person A might be all about sustainability, and alternative energy. She's trying to start a small solar thermal
installation business, but finds the regulations, taxation, and government corruption of officials and the Affirmative Action racial favoritism given to her competition make it impossible to get the business launched into stability.
Person B might be all about stopping the untested use of GMO foods.
He is a Doctor of Pharmacology and a University Researcher working on government grants, but is trying to get commercial research funding for his potential solution to the Epidemic of Autism in Western Countries. He got a son and a nephew both diagnosed with Autism, and it appears to be linked to a early developmental abnormality caused by a GMO designed compound in the shell of GMO corn kernels, which was designed to act as an organic pesticide.
He thinks he's found a new drug which could be used to nullify the effect of the GMO compound until the body metabolizes it, and therefor stop the epedemic. But the University is a bastion of Leftie Political Correctness, so despite his good evidence and sound science, he is told to drop the research, ... Or Else!
It sounds like they have very little in common. But after the PoliCubic Test, it turns out that they have roughly the same ratings for all five catagories and occupy roughly the same coordinate.
They both want change and improvement of their society and environment. They both want only limited involvement from the Government. They both believe in Science and find that the Liberal Machine Politics are getting in the way of making their contributions to the betterment of their society/Nation.
They both believe in Capitalism, and small business. But they don't like the Corporate Socialism being fostered by the current Obama Administration in things like the toxic CF light bulbs made by large contributor GE.
The distance between them in the PoliCubic tests show that they have allot in common, even though they may not realize it!
They really want the same kind of political candidate, but not one easily identified by the Labels of:
Left<---->Right
Democrat<------> Conservative.
They both want to elect Politicians who will have outcomes in the [+80,-60,-10] Coordinate Space.
-
We are living in sad times.
Senior Member
In numerical model terms:I don't really see how it would affect much of anything. It would merely represent a more complex method of stereotyping.
A Left<--------->Right number line has one degree of freedom. If there are -100<-----0----->+100 limits of integers, then there are only 200 possible outcomes.
A three coordinate space has volume, or three degrees of freedom. 200X200X200 = 8 Million possible outcomes.
When the summation aspect is used, the initial data starts with 200^5 = 800 Billion possible outcomes or Penta-Coordinate Nodes.
So, the model reduces the possible 800 Billion, to a manageable summary of 8 Million.
After numerical analysis, the Clusters of Nodes should further reduce the 8 Million possibles, into a real political campaign selection of 8-12 Cluster Nexus around which a Candidate can run a campaign for office.
8-12 Choices outside of the Left<------>Right Box!
Here are two forum threads which expand the concept with others input:
http://www.politicalforum.com/politi...-analysis.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/genera...-analysis.html
The system does not use Money or Class-Warfare arguments, but focuses on the leaders likely goals, approaches and outcomes, in terms of political control and policy emphasis.
The system is designed to find areas of Political Coalition that are multidimensional, but have significant numbers of members already.
It is a significant step away for just two choices, which, due to the corruption in D.C. end up being really just one non-choice.
-
We are living in sad times.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote