User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 30 of 47 FirstFirst ... 2026272829303132333440 ... LastLast
Results 291 to 300 of 463

Thread: Why is atheism so poorly represented in American politics?

  1. #291
    Points: 3,733, Level: 14
    Level completed: 37%, Points required for next Level: 317
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience Points3 months registered
    GrumpyDog's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1029
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Reconsidering where to dump
    Posts
    911
    Points
    3,733
    Level
    14
    Thanks Given
    70
    Thanked 195x in 159 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    11
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    Let's say you succeed politically through central planning in redistributing wealth so each person in the world has the same. Because politics is win-lose, taking from some to give to others, you have taken wealth from those capable of generating it. You have thus leveled everything. Then what?

    Why does everyone think that redistribution means producing exactly equal portions per person?

    Redistribution is just a means of getting currency to cycle through the economy more. When taxation on the upper 10%, who account for 75% of the yearly GDP, is "extracted" from that 10% and government then uses that money to create jobs, or gives the money directly as welfare, where do you think that money then goes?

    If you are objective, you must admit, that the money goes right back up the ladder, right back into the accounts of the wealthy, who own the industries, that produce goods, iincluding food production, which those who received the redistributed capital, then purchase, with that capital.
    "If somebody's dumb enough to ask me to go to a political convention and say something, they're gonna have to take what they get" - Clint Eastwood

  2. #292
    Original Ranter
    V.I.P
    Points: 71,880, Level: 65
    Level completed: 43%, Points required for next Level: 1,270
    Overall activity: 42.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second Class1 year registeredOverdrive50000 Experience Points
    Mister D's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    6938
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    24,803
    Points
    71,880
    Level
    65
    Thanks Given
    1,855
    Thanked 2,442x in 2,039 Posts
    Mentioned
    81 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    95
    Quote Originally Posted by Kizzume View Post
    So you're saying that Islamic countries are filled with peaceful, loving people who would never do bad things in the name of their religion?
    I couldn't give a rat's ass what Muslim countries are filled with. Why do you? Let them live as they choose. They don't need a westerner telling them the "right" way to live.

    Your sexuality is obviously at the center of this. You know most Christians have nothing against gays right?
    Whoever criticizes capitalism, while approving immigration, whose working class is its first victim, had better shut up. Whoever criticizes immigration, while remaining silent about capitalism, should do the same.


    ~Alain de Benoist


  3. #293
    tPF Moderator
    V.I.P
    Points: 65,650, Level: 62
    Level completed: 58%, Points required for next Level: 900
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive1 year registered50000 Experience PointsTagger First Class
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    9240
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    21,404
    Points
    65,650
    Level
    62
    Thanks Given
    1,049
    Thanked 3,714x in 2,880 Posts
    Mentioned
    145 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    115
    Quote Originally Posted by Kizzume View Post
    Gay marriage rights is not redistribution of wealth. Women being able to vote is not redistribution of wealth. Nondiscriminatory policies is not redistribution of wealth.
    Those are privileges. Wealth doesn't just mean money and capital.

    Anyway, my point's made, I'll let you argue with D.

  4. #294
    Original Ranter
    V.I.P
    Points: 71,880, Level: 65
    Level completed: 43%, Points required for next Level: 1,270
    Overall activity: 42.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second Class1 year registeredOverdrive50000 Experience Points
    Mister D's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    6938
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    24,803
    Points
    71,880
    Level
    65
    Thanks Given
    1,855
    Thanked 2,442x in 2,039 Posts
    Mentioned
    81 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    95
    Quote Originally Posted by Kizzume View Post
    Nice way to deflect what I was saying about religion. You can't seem to admit that religion can make people do awful things.
    You weren't saying anything about religion but rather individuals.

    So does politics. Should we get rid of that too? lol
    Whoever criticizes capitalism, while approving immigration, whose working class is its first victim, had better shut up. Whoever criticizes immigration, while remaining silent about capitalism, should do the same.


    ~Alain de Benoist


  5. #295
    Points: 3,733, Level: 14
    Level completed: 37%, Points required for next Level: 317
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience Points3 months registered
    GrumpyDog's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1029
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Reconsidering where to dump
    Posts
    911
    Points
    3,733
    Level
    14
    Thanks Given
    70
    Thanked 195x in 159 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    11
    Quote Originally Posted by Mister D View Post
    What does it mean?
    It means impoverishment and deprivation, no longer exist, because technology, and machinery, produce such an abundance, that the whole of that production can be distributed among the population irrespective of their individual ability.
    "If somebody's dumb enough to ask me to go to a political convention and say something, they're gonna have to take what they get" - Clint Eastwood

  6. #296
    Points: 4,164, Level: 15
    Level completed: 23%, Points required for next Level: 386
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience PointsSocial3 months registered
    Kizzume's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1074
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Tacoma, WA
    Posts
    770
    Points
    4,164
    Level
    15
    Thanks Given
    205
    Thanked 184x in 117 Posts
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    11
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    Those are privileges. Wealth doesn't just mean money and capital.

    Anyway, my point's made, I'll let you argue with D.
    Your point was changing the subject, but carry on.
    Sorry--but I do not accept the idea that being intolerant of intolerance is THE SAME THING as being intolerant of anything else.

  7. #297
    tPF Moderator
    V.I.P
    Points: 65,650, Level: 62
    Level completed: 58%, Points required for next Level: 900
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive1 year registered50000 Experience PointsTagger First Class
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    9240
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    21,404
    Points
    65,650
    Level
    62
    Thanks Given
    1,049
    Thanked 3,714x in 2,880 Posts
    Mentioned
    145 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    115
    Quote Originally Posted by GrumpyDog View Post
    Why does everyone think that redistribution means producing exactly equal portions per person?

    Redistribution is just a means of getting currency to cycle through the economy more. When taxation on the upper 10%, who account for 75% of the yearly GDP, is "extracted" from that 10% and government then uses that money to create jobs, or gives the money directly as welfare, where do you think that money then goes?

    If you are objective, you must admit, that the money goes right back up the ladder, right back into the accounts of the wealthy, who own the industries, that produce goods, iincluding food production, which those who received the redistributed capital, then purchase, with that capital.
    Political redistribution is coercive and win-lose, economic redistribution is voluntary and win-win.

  8. #298
    Points: 4,164, Level: 15
    Level completed: 23%, Points required for next Level: 386
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience PointsSocial3 months registered
    Kizzume's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1074
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Tacoma, WA
    Posts
    770
    Points
    4,164
    Level
    15
    Thanks Given
    205
    Thanked 184x in 117 Posts
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    11
    Quote Originally Posted by Mister D View Post
    You weren't saying anything about religion but rather individuals.
    I was talking about religion.
    Sorry--but I do not accept the idea that being intolerant of intolerance is THE SAME THING as being intolerant of anything else.

  9. #299
    V.I.P
    Points: 16,297, Level: 30
    Level completed: 85%, Points required for next Level: 153
    Overall activity: 25.0%
    Achievements:
    Social10000 Experience Points1 year registered
    roadmaster's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    2482
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    4,881
    Points
    16,297
    Level
    30
    Thanks Given
    717
    Thanked 1,004x in 806 Posts
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by Kizzume View Post
    I mock people who ignore science because of their religion. I mock people who degrade others because of their religion. I mock people who believe in animal torture (Halal meat) because of their religion. I mock people who think women should cover themselves from head to toe because of their religion. I mock people who strap bombs to their children because of their religion.
    That's not their religion, it's people distorting and not telling the truth. He said to follow Jesus but many of their leaders are telling them different.

  10. #300
    Original Ranter
    V.I.P
    Points: 71,880, Level: 65
    Level completed: 43%, Points required for next Level: 1,270
    Overall activity: 42.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second Class1 year registeredOverdrive50000 Experience Points
    Mister D's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    6938
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    24,803
    Points
    71,880
    Level
    65
    Thanks Given
    1,855
    Thanked 2,442x in 2,039 Posts
    Mentioned
    81 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    95
    Quote Originally Posted by GrumpyDog View Post
    It means impoverishment and deprivation, no longer exist, because technology, and machinery, produce such an abundance, that the whole of that production can be distributed among the population irrespective of their individual ability.
    How is heaven on Earth working out for you, religious loony?
    Whoever criticizes capitalism, while approving immigration, whose working class is its first victim, had better shut up. Whoever criticizes immigration, while remaining silent about capitalism, should do the same.


    ~Alain de Benoist


+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Linksgrower Forum Topsite Critical Acclaim Long Island's Topsites List
Top Ron Paul Sites - Ranking the best Ron Paul related Freedom and Liberty Websites