I've already talked about it many times. I'm not repeating myself. You don't like the way I word it because I dumb it down.Feel free to demonstrate it.
That answer makes no sense.It is not a question of what should be but of what is.
Why are people innocent until proven guilty--why not the other way around? It's to look at the good sides of people before looking at the bad.Really? I could we are all unequal until proven otherwise. Why is equality the default?
I'm sorry, I still don't get how that's an answer to the point I was making. You seem to be suggesting that we should be striving for inequality and that's something I can't wrap my mind around.This:
Alleviating pain and misery has nothing to do with equality. One cannot reject equality and care for his fellow man.