User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Theory Of Monetarism- facts show failure

  1. #1
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,827, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497548
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,878
    Points
    863,827
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,702
    Thanked 148,558x in 94,978 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Theory Of Monetarism- facts show failure

    Educated adults have seen Keynes' theories fail. Many clung to Milton Friedman when he offered an alternative view of political economy: monetarism- the use of monetary policy to keep the economy healthy.

    A set of views based on the belief that inflation depends on how much money the government prints. It is closely associated with Milton Friedman, who argued, based on the quantity theory of money, that the government should keep the money supply fairly steady, expanding it slightly each year mainly to allow for the natural growth of the economy.
    Thus, if inflation is kept low, the economy will grow.

    But..., we see in the chart below that something else is at work. Italy and Germany are part of the Eurozone and governed by the same monetary policy. The EZ has low inflation. Yes Italy's unemployment is high and Germany's is low. So this is empirical evidence that the Chicago School is just as incorrect and the Keynesian School. My thoughts: both are heavy on mathematics. Economics cannot be reduced to mathematical formulas. We are dealing with human behavior. Some of the naysayers may decide to give the Austrian School another look....


    Link
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    Chris (02-08-2015)

  3. #2
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,827, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497548
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,878
    Points
    863,827
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,702
    Thanked 148,558x in 94,978 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I also note that inflation is low in the US and our economy has signs of recovery. Yet compare that to Italy and explain the difference using Friedman.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  4. #3
    Points: 668,289, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.8%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433960
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    198,212
    Points
    668,289
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    32,240
    Thanked 81,549x in 55,058 Posts
    Mentioned
    2014 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    I like Friedman for a lot of things but his advocacy of monetary policy was wrong.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Chris For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (02-08-2015)

  6. #4
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,827, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497548
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,878
    Points
    863,827
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,702
    Thanked 148,558x in 94,978 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    I like Friedman for a lot of things but his advocacy of monetary policy was wrong.
    He, I think, forgot that economics is really political economy. But then, so did almost everyone else.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  7. #5
    Points: 668,289, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.8%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433960
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    198,212
    Points
    668,289
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    32,240
    Thanked 81,549x in 55,058 Posts
    Mentioned
    2014 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    That could be the problem though, that some think economics should be political. I think Friedman understood what many economists since Adam Smith have understood, that government intervention into the business cycle only distorts it and makes it worse.

  8. #6
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,827, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497548
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,878
    Points
    863,827
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,702
    Thanked 148,558x in 94,978 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    That could be the problem though, that some think economics should be political. I think Friedman understood what many economists since Adam Smith have understood, that government intervention into the business cycle only distorts it and makes it worse.
    I don't mean political economy in the sense that government intervention is needed. I mean it in a classical sense. Politics is the study of who gets what, when, where, and how. That can be with government or without. We can't use math while ignoring human nature in the field of economics.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  9. #7
    Points: 668,289, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.8%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433960
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    198,212
    Points
    668,289
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    32,240
    Thanked 81,549x in 55,058 Posts
    Mentioned
    2014 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    I don't mean political economy in the sense that government intervention is needed. I mean it in a classical sense. Politics is the study of who gets what, when, where, and how. That can be with government or without. We can't use math while ignoring human nature in the field of economics.
    Well, government shouldn't decide "who gets what, when, where, and how." Neither should economists. They can try to explain it, describe it, just not decide it.

    "The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design." ~Friedrich August von Hayek

    He had it right.

  10. #8
    Points: 23,956, Level: 37
    Level completed: 68%, Points required for next Level: 394
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Newpublius's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    39141
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Boynton Beach, FL
    Posts
    7,314
    Points
    23,956
    Level
    37
    Thanks Given
    1,556
    Thanked 4,124x in 2,794 Posts
    Mentioned
    94 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's not the low inflation rate, inflation should be low to give people rational expectations about prices. This allows the economy to make fundamentally better decisions based on appropriate signals. The malaise in the Mediterranean world and really in the euro zone generally, Germany being the exception, is that fiscal policies make government action far too prominent for any healthy economy, the result, steady prices notwithstanding, are muted incentives to produce.

  11. #9
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,827, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497548
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,878
    Points
    863,827
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,702
    Thanked 148,558x in 94,978 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Another thought- the cheap money (low inflation) creates malinvestment in some sectors. Especially undisciplined sectors.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  12. #10
    Points: 23,956, Level: 37
    Level completed: 68%, Points required for next Level: 394
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Newpublius's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    39141
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Boynton Beach, FL
    Posts
    7,314
    Points
    23,956
    Level
    37
    Thanks Given
    1,556
    Thanked 4,124x in 2,794 Posts
    Mentioned
    94 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    Another thought- the cheap money (low inflation) creates malinvestment in some sectors. Especially undisciplined sectors.
    Cheap money is actually an inflationary policy notwithstanding the fact that inflation is currently low. Asset prices and interest are inversely related. When inflation fears its ugly head, the central bank will typically raise rates to dampen inflation. And yes, cheap money skews price signals.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Newpublius For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (02-09-2015)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts