User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Government regulation to F'up the Internet

  1. #11
    Points: 64,730, Level: 62
    Level completed: 14%, Points required for next Level: 1,820
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    The Xl's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    196598
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    27,967
    Points
    64,730
    Level
    62
    Thanks Given
    6,255
    Thanked 19,793x in 11,974 Posts
    Mentioned
    433 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Redrose View Post
    IMO, anything that gives the government more control over ANYTHING is bad. Everything they touch gets f'd up.

    The government is bloated with rules, mandates, red tape, too many over paid bureaucrats, fraud, nepotism, greed, graft and lies.
    Exactly. And it's delusional to think an entity completely owned by special interests is going to change the internet for the betterment of the people. It's a comical assertion.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to The Xl For This Useful Post:

    Redrose (02-19-2015)

  3. #12
    Points: 92,741, Level: 74
    Level completed: 20%, Points required for next Level: 2,009
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Common Sense's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    931203
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    41,865
    Points
    92,741
    Level
    74
    Thanks Given
    14,245
    Thanked 16,124x in 11,355 Posts
    Mentioned
    545 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Redrose View Post
    IMO, anything that gives the government more control over ANYTHING is bad. Everything they touch gets f'd up.

    The government is bloated with rules, mandates, red tape, too many over paid bureaucrats, fraud, nepotism, greed, graft and lies.
    I suggest reading up on the issue. It's sort of complicated.

    What the current FCC regulation means is that the internet stays as is. Companies are not going to be allowed to limit access or speed in a pay to play scenario. It allows equal access to all people and all companies.

  4. #13
    Points: 43,288, Level: 50
    Level completed: 85%, Points required for next Level: 262
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Redrose's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    222843
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    10,893
    Points
    43,288
    Level
    50
    Thanks Given
    6,774
    Thanked 7,463x in 4,722 Posts
    Mentioned
    365 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Common Sense View Post
    I suggest reading up on the issue. It's sort of complicated.

    What the current FCC regulation means is that the internet stays as is. Companies are not going to be allowed to limit access or speed in a pay to play scenario. It allows equal access to all people and all companies.

    OK, I see that may be a good thing, but you know as well as I do, if you give them an inch they take a mile. You know the "camel's nose in the tent" scenario.

    If you give them the authority, who knows where it will end with future minds making decisions. Look at Social Security, it started out as non taxable income.

  5. #14
    Points: 26,391, Level: 39
    Level completed: 57%, Points required for next Level: 559
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Don's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    29692
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    5,286
    Points
    26,391
    Level
    39
    Thanks Given
    4,185
    Thanked 3,934x in 2,482 Posts
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Common Sense View Post
    Still waiting for an explanation as to how it's going to $#@! up the internet.

    Seems many who are against this legislation are actually ignorant in regards to this issue.
    Ajit Pai is one of the FCC commissioners. He is against the FCC controlling the internet. He thinks that if you knew what was in the proposal you would be against it too. But like Obama care they don't want you to know what is in it till the FCC controls the net

    Conspicuously visible on Pai’s desk is Wheeler’s net neutrality proposal, which has been circulated among the FCC commissioners but not released to the public. Pai has repeatedly wielded the bulky document as a prop in media appearances to condemn Wheeler’s plan and to needle the chairman for refusing to publish the text ahead of the FCC’s vote.


  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Don For This Useful Post:

    Redrose (02-19-2015)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts