Jim Webb

[Max Rockatansky]

Jim Webb won't be the nominee. You're worrying about nothing.

[Peter1469]

Jim Webb won't be the nominee. You're worrying about nothing.

Correct. That is why I suggested him to the dems.

[Ransom]

We can all easily do the same for you and your few ranting rager buddies lol. You have a clear head ransom

I've a clear memory, Common, and historical perspective. I can't and never speak for 'buddies', I'm careful to link and point out specifically what I'm writing about. When others start belly aching about being taken out of context, I post their exact words. As for myself, you can gladly bring up any previous post, position, pontification, or policy held by this member.....and I'll stand behind it. In fact, I often refer back to my own previous posts concerning foreign policies, economic issues, etc.

For example, one of my latest 'rants' being the downward revision in economic growth that has become endemic of this administration. During elections, the economy is smoking, while Obama makes his rounds admiring his economy and taking corporate campaign contributions(you Dems of course deafen us with your silence as this is (D) money), the economy is 'robust' his policies working. Months later, we get the actual numbers.....showing you the economy growing at just over 2%...not exactly robust by any objective measure. I linked to this pattern of revision from 2009 and 2013..thus proving my argument...proving one's argument something you and your 'buddies' don't exactly accomplish.

I'll back my arguments, Common. Making me one of the few.

[Ransom]

Correct. That is why I suggested him to the dems.

So, you were just f'n with us?

Thank God, Pete. I was starting to think you supported him for President. He's wholesale unqualified and a yes man.

[Ransom]

Jim Webb won't be the nominee. You're worrying about nothing.

In early March 2007....had I told you the Junior Senator from Illinois would be our next President, you'd have told me I was worrying about nothing as well. Hillary the lead.....no one else to 'worry' about was true 8 years ago too, Max.

[Peter1469]

So, you were just f'n with us?

Thank God, Pete. I was starting to think you supported him for President. He's wholesale unqualified and a yes man.

He is not a yes man. He left the Senate because he said it was useless.

How often do the left tell the GOP who to nominate?

[Max Rockatansky]

In early March 2007....had I told you the Junior Senator from Illinois would be our next President, you'd have told me I was worrying about nothing as well. Hillary the lead.....no one else to 'worry' about was true 8 years ago too, Max.

Panic is you like, Ransom, but the indicators aren't there. While Obama was a dark horse candidate, he had all the credentials for a Lefty nominee. Webb does not because he's too far right on issues contrary to Democrat ideology.

[Ransom]

He is not a yes man. He left the Senate because he said it was useless.

How often do the left tell the GOP who to nominate?

Originally Posted by Peter1469 Not necessarily. As my post above indicates the drop in the labor force participation rate is at the lower age range. If that is correct, that is not an indication of a healthy economy. An entire generation will be behind the earning curve and that can create a very long economic turn down as consumption drops.

[Peter1469]

The Dems want hard left- like big chief Warren. Webb is way to mainstream for them.

[Peter1469]

Originally Posted by Peter1469 Not necessarily. As my post above indicates the drop in the labor force participation rate is at the lower age range. If that is correct, that is not an indication of a healthy economy. An entire generation will be behind the earning curve and that can create a very long economic turn down as consumption drops.

That is a great quote. Feel free to steal it.