User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 234567 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 65

Thread: Marines to consider lowering combat standards for women

  1. #51
    Points: 28,428, Level: 41
    Level completed: 13%, Points required for next Level: 1,222
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    25000 Experience PointsVeteranSocial
    leekohler2's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    35020
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    8,148
    Points
    28,428
    Level
    41
    Thanks Given
    800
    Thanked 2,380x in 1,894 Posts
    Mentioned
    59 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Must have been a slow day on LGBT news. The OP's going after women today.
    I'm prancing like a pony.

  2. #52
    Points: 57,006, Level: 58
    Level completed: 33%, Points required for next Level: 1,344
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Grokmaster's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    5984
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    9,934
    Points
    57,006
    Level
    58
    Thanks Given
    12,205
    Thanked 5,815x in 3,968 Posts
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Please explain how that is "going after women"? They should be allowed LOWERED STANDARDS? What about all that "gender gap" bull$#@!?
    De Oppresso Liber



  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Grokmaster For This Useful Post:

    Abby08 (08-14-2017)

  4. #53
    Points: 79,176, Level: 68
    Level completed: 62%, Points required for next Level: 874
    Overall activity: 34.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Abby08's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    72753
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Arizona and New Mexico
    Posts
    35,923
    Points
    79,176
    Level
    68
    Thanks Given
    30,599
    Thanked 30,268x in 18,823 Posts
    Mentioned
    133 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If women want equality, if they REALLY want equality, they need to be treated no differently than the men.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Abby08 For This Useful Post:

    Grokmaster (03-12-2018)

  6. #54
    Points: 435,159, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdriveSocial
    Awards:
    Frequent Poster
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    308521
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton, Washington
    Posts
    184,592
    Points
    435,159
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    20,274
    Thanked 77,536x in 55,959 Posts
    Mentioned
    707 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by donttread View Post
    Is there a lot of call for that rope climbing thing in dessert wars?
    Are the men going to run a duty roster to see who gets stuck carrying the female's 110 lb rucksack, or is her gear going to be dispersed to everyone else keeping her load light?


    Is she going to be able to tote her share of ammunition for the machine gunners?


    Are there going to be jobs she can't perform because she doesn't have the upper body strength to handle the job?


    Combat operations is not the appropriate place to conduct a social experiment to satisfy the zealous supporters of political correctness.

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tahuyaman For This Useful Post:

    Abby08 (08-14-2017),Grokmaster (03-12-2018)

  8. #55
    Points: 173,568, Level: 98
    Level completed: 98%, Points required for next Level: 82
    Overall activity: 24.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    donttread's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    88650
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    52,063
    Points
    173,568
    Level
    98
    Thanks Given
    18,427
    Thanked 20,618x in 14,840 Posts
    Mentioned
    319 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Common View Post
    I knew this would happen, they lowered the standards for Police and Firemen because enough women couldnt qualify, it didnt do the professions any good.
    I fully understand women on the board arent going to like my opinion. Its not personal but I do believe it.

    This is a HUGE mistake if the corp does it.


    Two years ago, Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, the nation’s top military officer, laid down an edict on the Obama administration’s plan to open direct land combat jobs to women: If women cannot meet a standard, senior commanders better have a good reason why it should not be lowered.
    Today, the “Dempsey rule” appears to have its first test case.
    The Marine Corps just finished research to see if female officers could successfully complete its rigorous Infantry Officer Course.

    A IOC diploma is a must to earn the designation of infantry officer. Of 29 women who tried, none graduated; only four made it through the first day’s combat endurance test.
    Corps public affairs said it did not have the data on which tasks proved the toughest for women. But one particularly demanding upper-body strength test is climbing a 25-foot rope with a backpack full of gear. A candidate who cannot crawl to the top fails the test.



    Traditionalists see the 0-29 performance as a call to arms by those inside the Pentagon who are determined to have significant numbers of women in the infantry. They are on the lookout for standards they believe are no longer relevant in today’s battlefield.



    We have an arsenal of weapons that cost billions, sometimes billions to develop each . Woman should be able to fire a bunker buster from 15 miles away just as well as a man. Or use that expensive, shoot around corners urban riffle of one of the guns that fires more bullets per minute that you could possibly ever need it to.
    If these expensive weapons are so effective why does size and strength matter so much? And if size and strength are all that matter why spend so much money on these weapons instead of power lifting boot camps?

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to donttread For This Useful Post:

    Grokmaster (03-12-2018)

  10. #56
    Points: 173,568, Level: 98
    Level completed: 98%, Points required for next Level: 82
    Overall activity: 24.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    donttread's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    88650
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    52,063
    Points
    173,568
    Level
    98
    Thanks Given
    18,427
    Thanked 20,618x in 14,840 Posts
    Mentioned
    319 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by donttread View Post
    We have an arsenal of weapons that cost billions, sometimes billions to develop each . Woman should be able to fire a bunker buster from 15 miles away just as well as a man. Or use that expensive, shoot around corners urban riffle of one of the guns that fires more bullets per minute that you could possibly ever need it to.
    If these expensive weapons are so effective why does size and strength matter so much? And if size and strength are all that matter why spend so much money on these weapons instead of power lifting boot camps?

  11. #57
    Original Ranter
    Points: 862,885, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497359
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,667
    Points
    862,885
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,621
    Thanked 148,369x in 94,864 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by donttread View Post
    We have an arsenal of weapons that cost billions, sometimes billions to develop each . Woman should be able to fire a bunker buster from 15 miles away just as well as a man. Or use that expensive, shoot around corners urban riffle of one of the guns that fires more bullets per minute that you could possibly ever need it to.
    If these expensive weapons are so effective why does size and strength matter so much? And if size and strength are all that matter why spend so much money on these weapons instead of power lifting boot camps?
    That is what the Air Force is for.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    Grokmaster (03-12-2018)

  13. #58
    Points: 141,821, Level: 90
    Level completed: 66%, Points required for next Level: 1,229
    Overall activity: 24.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Ransom's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    48074
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    44,290
    Points
    141,821
    Level
    90
    Thanks Given
    10,164
    Thanked 15,081x in 10,767 Posts
    Mentioned
    496 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    Please explain how that is "going after women"? They should be allowed LOWERED STANDARDS? What about all that "gender gap" bull$#@!?
    Sure. The going after women line is a victim mentality at work. Someone must be offended, there must be a victim. Identity politics 101. If you start talking military readiness, how it affects our military in combat.....that is an objective look and perspective thus creates no victim. Lee above provides the victim for us above, "going after women."

    Same shiit from these people, different day.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Ransom For This Useful Post:

    Grokmaster (03-12-2018)

  15. #59
    Points: 39,654, Level: 48
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 496
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    VeteranTagger First Class25000 Experience PointsSocial
    waltky's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    5662
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    8,859
    Points
    39,654
    Level
    48
    Thanks Given
    2,515
    Thanked 2,140x in 1,616 Posts
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Flygirl competes for 'Best Warrior' Title...

    Lone Female Competitor Battles for 'Best Warrior' Title
    12 Mar 2018 -- Of the more than 3,200 airmen serving in the Texas Air National Guard, only eight were selected to compete at Camp Swift as part of the 2018 Texas Military Department Best Warrior Competition. Among the selectees, one stood out from her peers -- not just for her skill and abilities in qualifying to represent her unit, but also as the only female competitor.
    "Competing seemed like a great opportunity," said Air Force Tech. Sgt. Jennifer Brown, an education and training specialist with the Texas Air National Guard's 273rd Cyber Operations Squadron. "For me, it wasn't an imitation factor. I used to be a Marine, and I remember every year my commander would send out an invite for individuals interested in the competition. When I saw the email for this year and saw the list of different knowledge responsibilities I went ahead and tried out."

    Competition

    The Best Warrior Competition consists of several challenges over a period of four days. Competitors are expected to display proficiency in marksmanship, physical and written tests, land navigation, self-aid buddy care and combat-communications. Though not a part of her day-to-day operations, Brown trained for months prior to familiarize herself with competition requirements. "The ruck [march] has been the most challenging thus far," she said. "I don't think I was as prepared for the last four miles of fatigue, but it's something you have to learn and power through on your own. The obstacle course was the most fun. It was hard at points, but the competition is about challenging yourself. Getting over the fear factor."


    Air Force Tech. Sgt. Jennifer Brown, an education and training specialist with the Texas Air National Guard’s 273rd Cyber Operations Squadron, jumps over an obstacle during the 2018 Best Warrior Competition near Bastrop, Texas, March 1, 2018.

    Brown has more than fifteen years of combined service between the Marines and the Texas Air National Guard. Even with deployments to Iraq under her belt, she still lacked all of the experience needed to be successful to compete. So, after she qualified at the base level, Brown's unit was instrumental in making sure that she would be a strong contender. "It [training] exposed me to a different environment in the guard," she said. "To train, we ran tactical air control party obstacle courses, had weapons knowledge training and did 45-pound ruck marches, which was good because I got exposure. Then they had land navigation at the schoolhouse at Camp Bullis."

    Real-World Situations

    The competition is meant to be grueling, with extreme stress and long testing hours. The simulations reflect real-world combat situations and test the tactical and technical skills of the members being evaluated. Competing alongside her fellow airmen, soldiers and state partners provides a unique opportunity to experience completely different ways of accomplishing the mission, Brown said. "We all serve." she said. "It's a humbling experience, and being here, I hope, is an example that will encourage others to participate. I don't back down from a challenge and I'm proud to have been a part of this event."

    https://www.military.com/daily-news/...ior-title.html

  16. #60
    Points: 39,654, Level: 48
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 496
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    VeteranTagger First Class25000 Experience PointsSocial
    waltky's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    5662
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    8,859
    Points
    39,654
    Level
    48
    Thanks Given
    2,515
    Thanked 2,140x in 1,616 Posts
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Red face

    Uncle Ferd's g/f protects him from bullies (Run, Ferd, Run!)...

    Women Should Be Recognized as Natural Protectors: Air Force Secretary
    20 Mar`18 - Women in the military should be recognized for their inherent roles as "protectors" to boost their advancement in the ranks and enhance their recruitment and retention, Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson said Tuesday.
    "If I asked everyone in this room to think, just close your eyes for a second and think about the most protective person you know in your life, someone who would do anything to keep you safe -- half the people in this room are thinking about their moms," she said. "We are the protectors," Wilson said in making the case for valuing women's contribution to the military's mission. "That's what the military does. We serve to protect the rest of you, and that's a very natural place for a woman to be," she said in testimony with the two other service secretaries at a House Armed Services Committee hearing on the budget. Wilson’s comments were similar to those made January during a speech at the Bipartisan Policy Center, where she gave a keynote address about future service members.

    Wilson, who graduated from the Air Force Academy in 1982 in the third class to accept women, was responding to questions from Rep. Susan Davis, D-California, on her concerns about the recruitment and retention of women in the military. "More women than men, as we know, leave the military at various career points, so concerns persist that this attrition will result in a disproportionate impact to mission readiness if left unresolved," Davis said. Wilson said there is a perception problem that has to be addressed in the way the military appeals to young women. "We're, I think, trying to change a little bit the way we talk and think about who the protectors are in this country, because I think sometimes the way in which we talk about the services may appeal more to boys than to girls," she said. "And that's important, the way we talk about these things."


    Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson speaks about innovation during the Air Force Association Air Warfare Symposium, Orlando, Fla.

    Wilson's comments were enthusiastically endorsed by other members of the committee. Rep. Mike Conaway, R-Texas, an Army veteran, noted the hush in the room as Wilson spoke: "Your words are reverberating here," he said. Rep. Trent Kelly, R-Mississippi, an Iraq veteran and a brigadier general in the Army National Guard, said Wilson may have been off in her estimate that half the people in the committee room think of women as protectors. "I think it was well said, but I think the numbers were too low," Kelly said. He said 90 percent would see women as protectors. Wilson said the Air Force is looking at ways to allow service members to leave the military to start a family or pursue a degree and return without having their careers sidelined.

    Army Secretary Mark Esper and Navy Secretary Richard V. Spencer, who also testified, said they are pursuing similar opportunities for their services. "Going forward, rest assured the Navy is really looking at this," Spencer said. "It's game on because all three of us fish from the same [recruitment] pool, and that pool is getting smaller and smaller both by qualification and by demographic size. "We are going to be competing with the private sector," he said. "As the economy increases, we're going to see more competition there. We're going to use every single tool available to us." Esper noted that all military occupational specialties, including combat billets, were opened to women in 2016. "They are doing very well," he said. "I've had the chance to visit with them, the units [women are] in in both at the National Training Center and at Fort Bragg," Esper said, "and at this point, under the Leaders First policy, we have dozens of leaders in these battalion-size units. So a lot of expansion happening there."

    https://www.military.com/daily-news/...secretary.html
    See also:

    Air Force Secretary: Military Is 'Very Natural Place for a Woman To Be'
    March 20, 2018 | - The U.S. Air Force has a higher percentage of women than any of the other military branches, and more women are entering the U.S. Air Force Academy, Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson said on Tuesday.
    Wilson told the House Armed Services Committee said the Air Force is trying to change the way people talk and think about the nation's "protectors."

    Because I think sometimes the way in which we talk about the services may appeal more to boys than to girls. And that's important, the way we talk about these things.

    You know, if I asked everyone in this room to think -- just close your eyes for a second and think about the most protective person you know in your life -- someone who would do anything to keep you safe -- half the people in this room are thinking about their moms. We are the protectors.

    That's what the military does. We serve to protect the rest of you. And that's a very natural place for a woman to be.

    https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article...place-woman-be

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts