Changes to Moderation:

[The Sage of Main Street]

We could assign them point values but for now chose not to. Still, so many "pointless" infractions will lead to a "pointed" one.

So, what's the point?

[Chris]

So....Is there an infraction meter somewhere that we can check to see if someone is naughty or nice?

Afraid all you can see is your own meter: Go to your Profile, click on the Infractions tab. If you don't see the tab, you're nice.

We considered outsourcing to Santa but don't have the funds.

[Chris]

So, what's the point?

For the new warning and TB infrations, 0, zero, nada, nil, null.... But we use new math and they add up.

[The Sage of Main Street]

People who continually violate the rules are not treated the same as people who slip up now and then. Numbers can show that.

Your last post made my mind numb. Now it is even number.

[Chris]

Your last post made my mind numb. Now it is even number.

Touché, shall we say.

[The Sage of Main Street]

For the new warning and TB infrations, 0, zero, nada, nil, null.... But we use new math and they add up.

Is that like zero-point energy? Positive infinity and negative infinity are the biggest numbers possible, yet they add up to zero.

[Peter1469]

Your last post made my mind numb. Now it is even number.

I claim success.

[Chris]

Is that like zero-point energy? Positive infinity and negative infinity are the biggest numbers possible, yet they add up to zero.

Yes, like a quantum vacuum. All based on the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. Keep 'em guessing.

[Captain Obvious]

We could assign them point values but for now chose not to. Still, so many "pointless" infractions will lead to a "pointed" one.

So they do kinda count for something even though there aren't technical "points" allotted to them.

[Peter1469]

So they do kinda count for something even though there aren't technical "points" allotted to them.

If a member collects warnings that can be the basis for further actions.

That has always been the case. This is only an easy way to keep track.