User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Health care is NEVER Democrats fault

  1. #1
    Points: 138,693, Level: 89
    Level completed: 78%, Points required for next Level: 757
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdrive50000 Experience PointsRecommendation Second ClassVeteran
    Bob's Avatar Banned
    Karma
    1132
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Fremont. CA
    Posts
    36,458
    Points
    138,693
    Level
    89
    Thanks Given
    2,956
    Thanked 4,335x in 3,667 Posts
    Mentioned
    932 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Health care is NEVER Democrats fault

    The story by Democrats is this health care is not their fault.

    Whose fault do the claim it is?

    Mitt Romney of course.

    Supposedly had HE never caused it, it would not be law.

    This comes to you from Wikipedia.

    In November 2004, political leaders began advocating major reforms of the Massachusetts health care insurance system to expand coverage. First, the Senate President Robert Travaglini called for a plan to reduce the number of uninsured by half. A few days later, Governor Romney announced that he would propose a plan to cover virtually all the uninsured.[15]
    At the same time, the ACT (Affordable Care Today) Coalition introduced a bill that expanded MassHealth (Medicaid andSCHIP) coverage and increased health coverage subsidy programs and required employers to either provide coverage or pay an assessment to the state. The coalition began gathering signatures to place their proposal on the ballot in November 2006 if the legislature did not enact comprehensive health care reform, resulting in the collection of over 75,000 signatures on the MassACT ballot proposal. The Blue Cross Blue Shield Foundation sponsored a study, "Roadmap to Coverage," to expand coverage to everyone in the Commonwealth.[16]
    Attention focused on the House when then-Massachusetts House Speaker Salvatore DiMasi, speaking at a Blue Cross Blue Shield Foundation Roadmap To Coverage forum in October 2005, pledged to pass a bill through the House by the end of the session. At the forum, the Foundation issued a series of reports on reform options, all of which included an individual mandate. At the end of the month, the Joint Committee on Health Care Financing approved a reform proposal crafted by House Speaker DiMasi, Committee co-chair Patricia Walrath, and other House members.[17] The state faced pressure from the federal government to make changes to the federal waiver that allows the state to operate an expanded Medicaid program. Under the existing waiver, the state was receiving $385 million in federal funds to reimburse hospitals for services provided to the uninsured. The free care pool had to be restructured so that individuals, rather than institutions, received the funding.[18] Then-U.S. Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA) made a special effort to broker a compromise between the Republican Governor and the Democratic State Legislature.[citation needed]
    Legislation[edit]

    In Fall 2005, the House and Senate each passed health care insurance reform bills. The legislature made a number of changes to Governor Romney's original proposal, including expanding MassHealth (Medicaid and SCHIP) coverage to low-income children and restoring funding for public health programs. The most controversial change was the addition of a provision which requires firms with 11 or more workers that do not provide "fair and reasonable" health coverage to their workers to pay an annual penalty. This contribution, initially $295 annually per worker, is intended to equalize the free care pool charges imposed on employers who do and do not cover their workers.
    On April 12, 2006, Governor Romney signed the health legislation.[19] He vetoed eight sections of the health care legislation, including the controversial employer assessment.[20] He vetoed provisions providing dental benefits to poor residents on the Medicaid program, and providing health coverage to senior and disabled legal immigrants not eligible for federal Medicaid.[21] The legislature promptly overrode six of the eight gubernatorial section vetoes, on May 4, 2006, and by mid-June 2006 had overridden the remaining two.[22]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massach...orm#Background

  2. #2
    Points: 147,385, Level: 92
    Level completed: 21%, Points required for next Level: 2,865
    Overall activity: 75.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    zelmo1234's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    156770
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    MICHIGAN
    Posts
    56,164
    Points
    147,385
    Level
    92
    Thanks Given
    24,283
    Thanked 20,054x in 14,357 Posts
    Mentioned
    432 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Well at least they have moved on from GWB. I guess that is progress?

  3. #3
    Points: 64,696, Level: 62
    Level completed: 12%, Points required for next Level: 1,854
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranSocial
    texan's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    32859
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    12,672
    Points
    64,696
    Level
    62
    Thanks Given
    3,512
    Thanked 5,749x in 3,852 Posts
    Mentioned
    125 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It doesn't really matter who is "at fault" it is here to stay and there are some good things that came with it.........Let's fix it and hopefully get the bloated gov costs out of it and make it work.

    I would gladly turn the IRS into the body that managed HC in exchange for a flat fair tax.
    I am tired of everyone fighting with each other. This is all by design.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts