User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: SCOTUS turns down 2nd Amendment case

  1. #11
    Original Ranter
    Points: 859,042, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 90.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    496573
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    241,693
    Points
    859,042
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,218
    Thanked 147,583x in 94,415 Posts
    Mentioned
    2552 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tahuyaman View Post
    Not only that, but the precedent has now been set that courts can alter or rewrite law. The courts are now an extension of the legislature.
    Unfortunately true.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  2. #12
    Points: 99,477, Level: 76
    Level completed: 82%, Points required for next Level: 473
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album pictures50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteran
    PolWatch's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    299327
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    33,626
    Points
    99,477
    Level
    76
    Thanks Given
    20,557
    Thanked 25,148x in 15,266 Posts
    Mentioned
    895 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I was not participating on the forum when the Citizens United ruling was announced. Was there as much concern with that ruling (corporate person hood) as with the recent decisions?
    Through all of our running and all of our cunning, if we couldn't laugh we just would go insane. - Jimmy Buffett

  3. #13
    Original Ranter
    Points: 859,042, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 90.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    496573
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    241,693
    Points
    859,042
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,218
    Thanked 147,583x in 94,415 Posts
    Mentioned
    2552 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by PolWatch View Post
    I was not participating on the forum when the Citizens United ruling was announced. Was there as much concern with that ruling (corporate person hood) as with the recent decisions?
    I started a thread trashing the decision.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    PolWatch (07-01-2015)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts