In the middle of July 2007,
George W. Bush’s Gallup approval rating was 31 percent, with 63 percent disapproving. As of mid-July 2015, President Barack Obama’s approval and disapproval in the same poll are both 47 percent.
I did the math for you, Tea Partiers: Obama’s margin is about 32 percent better.
What’s even more remarkable is that
a recent Suffolk University/USA Today poll showed that the president, after more than six bruising years in office, is more popular than any
candidate for president. His approval and disapproval in that poll is 44 percent, and the only candidates whose approval is slightly higher than his disapproval — Scott Walker, Ben Carson and Bernie Sanders — are still completely unknown to 1 out of 5 Americans.
Approval ratings don’t signify success, of course.
But what they do show is that the Republican perception of Obama as a failure somewhere on the spectrum between George W. Bush and the Hindenburg towing the Titanic is unique to them. And despite their best efforts to destroy his presidency, it’s thriving because the very things they see as failures, much of the public perceives as successes.
In an era of remarkable “
negative partisanship,” the current occupant of the White House is seeing hints of Reagan-like rise in his approval rating, while W. saw a Nixon-like crumble in his for a pretty simple reason: Obama has seen a long string of policy successes that may be unrivaled by any recent president.
“Obama may be singular as a president, not only because of his striking background,” Kenneth Adelman, Ronald Reagan’s arms control negotiator with the Soviets,
told Politico Magazine. “It may turn out that unlike virtually any other president, his second term is actually better than his first.”
http://www.nationalmemo.com/5-reason..._content=Final