User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456
Results 51 to 53 of 53

Thread: What came before the Big Bang?

  1. #51
    Original Ranter
    Points: 314,886, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second Class50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteranYour first Group
    Captain Obvious's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    773942
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    80,473
    Points
    314,886
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    30,199
    Thanked 40,087x in 27,208 Posts
    Mentioned
    1041 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sachem View Post
    Two and a Half Men.
    The only sitcom I could watch, it was actually funny.

    Pre Ashton Kutcher that is.
    my junk is ugly

  2. #52
    Points: 80,798, Level: 69
    Level completed: 32%, Points required for next Level: 1,652
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    del's Avatar Banned
    Karma
    1781014
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    30,663
    Points
    80,798
    Level
    69
    Thanks Given
    12,798
    Thanked 18,872x in 12,227 Posts
    Mentioned
    499 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the little foreplay

  3. #53
    Original Ranter
    Points: 298,328, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 14.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Mister D's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    416629
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    118,065
    Points
    298,328
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    25,344
    Thanked 53,574x in 36,513 Posts
    Mentioned
    1102 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    The only way to settle this will be to confirm or refute the findings with better data. As luck would have it, new data is forthcoming thanks to the Planck spacecraft that is currently peering into the cosmic microwave background with more resolution and greater sensitivity than ever.

    Cosmologists should have a decent data set to play with in a couple of years or so. When they get it, these circles should either spring into clear view or disappear into noise (rather like the mysterious Mars face that appeared in pictures of the red planet taken by Viking 1 and then disappeared in the higher resolution shots from the Mars Global Surveyor).
    Planck should settle the matter; or, with any luck, introduce an even better mystery. In the meantime, there’s going to be some fascinating discussion about this data and what it implies about the nature of the universe. We’ll be watching.
    The above is from NGC's article. I was curious so I looked this Planck data up. The data has been available for about two years and it should be admitted that the Planck data has more or less settled the matter as least as far the rather extravagant claims made in 2010 are concerned. There remains no evidence for multiverses but the data in question does not exactly disprove their existence. Then again, that was sort of my point. It's not falsifiable and therefore not scientific.
    Whoever criticizes capitalism, while approving immigration, whose working class is its first victim, had better shut up. Whoever criticizes immigration, while remaining silent about capitalism, should do the same.


    ~Alain de Benoist


+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts