Other countries attacking the threat competently with limited American involvement?

[Ransom]

Just because the attacks are "blowback" doesn't mean you don't counter. It means you counter, without occupation and quit doing the $#@! that caused the blowback

Russia hadn't occupied nor attempted nation building and yet attacked. France attacked, they've had lenient immigration policies and had not been bombing in Syria. I believe the neutral Belgium also in the news these days......were the French attacks blowback, donttread? And does that response 'create' further terrorism, will Hollande's military response just keep France in ISIS' crosshairs?

[Ransom]

Non-interventionism does not conflict wiht self defence

You're a pretty good dancer, donttread.

[donttread]

Russia hadn't occupied nor attempted nation building and yet attacked. France attacked, they've had lenient immigration policies and had not been bombing in Syria. I believe the neutral Belgium also in the news these days......were the French attacks blowback, donttread? And does that response 'create' further terrorism, will Hollande's military response just keep France in ISIS' crosshairs?

Didn't you call the French imperialist in a previous post?

[donttread]

You're a pretty good dancer, donttread.

No dancing, just a straight answer. Therefore it's no wonder you don't understand

[Ransom]

Didn't you call the French imperialist in a previous post?

The post you're responding to has not one, but two question marks as the tactic of answering a question with yet another question continues. Peter will reduce himself to personal insults, you answer questions with questions when off balance. You earlier claimed you weren't sure, after further analysis, you've another opportunity. Were the attacks on Paris 'blowback', donttread, I'm asking your opinion. Does the response thus given by the French 'create' more terrorism? Won't this response only serve to keep France in ISIS' crosshairs?

Three questions I'd asked that haven't been answered, I do think one of them received an "I'm not sure" at one time or another, but frankly, I'm already aware you're not sure. I mean...c'mon. We both know that. Elaborate on your....unsure...please.

[Ransom]

No dancing, just a straight answer. Therefore it's no wonder you don't understand

Your reduce and shrink thesis not really fitting in with reality as you support military strikes on ISIS following these attacks as long as someone else is doing it. I'm underlining your several faced arguments, they aren't consistent and highlight your anti-US bias.

You're dancing trying desperately to keep the focus off your erred and embarrassing opinions.

And yer a good dancer...yer just not good enough. If I wasn't a member...it would be enough.

But I'm a member, thus...your dancing won't ever be enough. Sorry.

[donttread]

Your reduce and shrink thesis not really fitting in with reality as you support military strikes on ISIS following these attacks as long as someone else is doing it. I'm underlining your several faced arguments, they aren't consistent and highlight your anti-US bias.

You're dancing trying desperately to keep the focus off your erred and embarrassing opinions.

And yer a good dancer...yer just not good enough. If I wasn't a member...it would be enough.

But I'm a member, thus...your dancing won't ever be enough. Sorry.

Yeah, whatever. Happy Thanksgiving and try not to invade anyone today

[Peter1469]

Yeah, whatever. Happy Thanksgiving and try not to invade anyone today

lol

Ransom doesn't invade. He only advocates for it. From his armchair.