“A 'civilization' that makes such a ridiculous fuss about alleged 'war crimes' - acts of violence against the actual or potential enemies of one's cause - and tolerates slaughterhouses and vivisection laboratories, and circuses and the fur industry (infliction of pain upon creatures that can never be for or against any cause), does not deserve to live.”
- Savitri Devi
Whoever criticizes capitalism, while approving immigration, whose working class is its first victim, had better shut up. Whoever criticizes immigration, while remaining silent about capitalism, should do the same.
~Alain de Benoist
None of that makes much sense, so where to start...
Simply not so. Socialism is a theory, in the simplest sense of the word, a laying out, by Robert Owen, say, or Karl Marx, prescriptions of what ought ideally to be, a utopian vision. Capitalism is not a theory. Yes, there are theories of capitalism, from Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations to even Marx's Das Capital to that of Mises, Hayek, Rothbard, but these theories about capitalism are descriptive of what is, not prescriptions of what ought to be, and not utopian but quite messy, tentative, incomplete, predictive. So, no, not all economies are theories.All economic systems are theories in practice.
(B) contradicts (A) since if it has failed it has been tried. In practice--be it Communism, Fascism, Nazism, or even Social Democracy--it has always failed--Social Democracy is failing in Europe as we in the US adopt it.(A) Simply because we are refusing to try socialism as a theory (at least in the West), doesn't mean it's a less viable economic system. (B) The most common reason it has failed is because of military intervention from places like the US.
Moreover, because socialism fails not because of some imagined military intervention, but because it is based on central planning--you cannot design economies, nor can you plan or manage them but to their detriment.
Granted, capitalism is not barter, but, please, explain how if you provide some good or service to me in exchange for some money that I received in exchange for some other good or service, explain how that is not voluntary but coercive? Does a plumber come to your door gun in hand to force his services on you? Are you forced by some law to shop at any particular store? Yes, please, explain how money makes the free market coercive.And there is a difference between bartering and capitalism. One requires symbolic/theoretical credit/currency. The other requires direct exchange of goods. One is much more natural. The other is more coerced.
Apologies if my argument sidetracks the OP topic. I do believe there is a connection in that any socialist--Nazi, Fascist, Communist--designed, planned and managed economy, regardless of good intentions, paves the road to perdition, serfdom. And that only a free market, freedom itself, allows for men to be virtuous, inasmuch as they can be.
“A 'civilization' that makes such a ridiculous fuss about alleged 'war crimes' - acts of violence against the actual or potential enemies of one's cause - and tolerates slaughterhouses and vivisection laboratories, and circuses and the fur industry (infliction of pain upon creatures that can never be for or against any cause), does not deserve to live.”
- Savitri Devi
“A 'civilization' that makes such a ridiculous fuss about alleged 'war crimes' - acts of violence against the actual or potential enemies of one's cause - and tolerates slaughterhouses and vivisection laboratories, and circuses and the fur industry (infliction of pain upon creatures that can never be for or against any cause), does not deserve to live.”
- Savitri Devi
How is the zionist phenomena, any different than Nazism in anything but scale?
Living space. (settlement)
Apartheid ( refusal to give I'ds to Palestinians)
Genocide ( many many civillians targeted due to race)
Racial elitism (only Jews can rule Israel, goy are not as good as jews)
So how is it any different?