Originally Posted by
RollingWave
No, it specifically says rail gun (which for a simplified explanation, is basically a cannon round that is sped up not by gunpowder, but by a rail of electro magnet, it can reach speeds well exceeding current cannons and missiles) and lasers, meaning the next generation weapons, this couple with the ship's size, means by default I assume that it is a nuclear reactor ship, maybe even a very significantly bigger nuclear reactor than the carriers, because rail gun and lasers would all eat up energy like crazy.
Most of those aren't exactly secret tech, lasers and railgun concept have existed at least since WW2, the problem is actually implementing them successfully is much easier said than done.
anyway, as an ex-navy and military tech fan this is obviously exciting, though I figure that the risk is obviously submarines and long range torpedos in general.
I do wonder, isn't it possible to just make very large torpedos that can travel a long distance by itself? (like a few hundred km) if I was in charge of making weapons to take down the USN that would certainly be what I think of . they shouldn't be THAT expensive, and if you launch them in mass it's impossible to avoid, and there's no real known effective measure to destroy torpedos in water . only to avoid them. but with modern computer improvements, it's possible to design what is essentially a unmanned kamakazi small submarine fleet that can be programmed to travel long distance, then turn on it's detectors in certain area, if they detect certain patterns then go into fire mode etc. you can even drop them with old style bombers at a long range.
I think that might be the future, especially for people who want to deal with the USN, underwater drones basically. (of course, the difficulty is that you can't really send commands to these guys when they're under water. so there is the risk that they uncontrollably blew up things that they weren't suppose to.)