← Shrink player Benghazi victim's sister shocked by Bill Clinton's comments

[Subdermal]

Do you two idiots believe that the video of the burning compound was actually in the background as Bill was talking?

Bunched panties alert. Are you so much of a sunflower that having such a video in the background causes you to worry that - what - Clinton's commentary would not be put in a correct light?

You're free to complain that Clinton's comments were editorialized - because they were. That doesn't mean the editorialization was unfair, however, because it wasn't. It captured exactly the anger that anti-Clinton people have for her actions, and now, by extension, his.

I expect you're angry because of its effectiveness.

So, if I praise the little girl in Texas who saved the life of a classmate by giving her a puff of her asthma inhaler, am I - in your mind - saying that he's braver than the Pakastani girl who was shot in the head by the Taliban?

How in the hell is that analogous?

Your foolish partisanship is showing.

Your objection simply demonstrates your partisanship. It's why you're reacting.

[Subdermal]

You can say $#@!. So long as you are not attacking another member.

$#@!.

see?

Wut?