Members banned from this thread: domer76


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 23 FirstFirst 123456713 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 228

Thread: can someone show me where in the constitution

  1. #21
    Points: 665,328, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 84.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433318
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    197,557
    Points
    665,328
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    31,984
    Thanked 80,907x in 54,722 Posts
    Mentioned
    2011 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by del View Post
    try to be less vapid than usual
    More noncontributory nonsense.

    You started a thread on what the Constitution says about the process. Seems to have backfired. So now you run away.
    Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire. ― Gustav Mahler

  2. #22
    Points: 500,453, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Cigar's Avatar Banned
    Karma
    325517
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Wow, what next?
    Posts
    78,900
    Points
    500,453
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    4,088
    Thanked 12,276x in 9,780 Posts
    Mentioned
    1541 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    They have already issued their advice and consent from the Senate Leader ... hours after the Death of The SCJ



  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cigar For This Useful Post:

    AeonPax (02-16-2016),Crepitus (02-16-2016)

  4. #23
    Points: 113,293, Level: 81
    Level completed: 89%, Points required for next Level: 357
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    hanger4's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    221647
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Mountains of WNC
    Posts
    43,200
    Points
    113,293
    Level
    81
    Thanks Given
    12,975
    Thanked 22,756x in 15,337 Posts
    Mentioned
    549 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cigar View Post
    I'm sure the Democrats and The Voters will remember those New Requirements

    Nothing new about it.
    It's ok if you disagree with me. I can't force you to be right.

  5. #24
    Points: 500,453, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Cigar's Avatar Banned
    Karma
    325517
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Wow, what next?
    Posts
    78,900
    Points
    500,453
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    4,088
    Thanked 12,276x in 9,780 Posts
    Mentioned
    1541 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    More noncontributory nonsense.

    You started a thread on what the Constitution says about the process. Seems to have backfired. So now you run away.
    So how does The Constitution differ from what Mich said a couple hours after The SCJ death?

  6. #25
    Points: 665,328, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 84.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433318
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    197,557
    Points
    665,328
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    31,984
    Thanked 80,907x in 54,722 Posts
    Mentioned
    2011 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Archer0915 View Post
    ...
    Quote Originally Posted by look it up
    He shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States, whose appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by law: but the Congress may by law vest the appointment of such inferior officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the courts of law, or in the heads of departments.

    Lookitup seems informed. Why is there any question about it?
    Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire. ― Gustav Mahler

  7. #26
    Points: 113,293, Level: 81
    Level completed: 89%, Points required for next Level: 357
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    hanger4's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    221647
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Mountains of WNC
    Posts
    43,200
    Points
    113,293
    Level
    81
    Thanks Given
    12,975
    Thanked 22,756x in 15,337 Posts
    Mentioned
    549 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by del View Post
    rejecting it before it's put forward, before a name is even put forth, isn't.

    derp
    Why del ??
    It's ok if you disagree with me. I can't force you to be right.

  8. #27
    Points: 665,328, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 84.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433318
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    197,557
    Points
    665,328
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    31,984
    Thanked 80,907x in 54,722 Posts
    Mentioned
    2011 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cigar View Post
    So how does The Constitution differ from what Mich said a couple hours after The SCJ death?
    I care what the Constitution says. I don't care what "Mich" says.
    Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire. ― Gustav Mahler

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Chris For This Useful Post:

    Archer0915 (02-16-2016)

  10. #28
    Points: 113,293, Level: 81
    Level completed: 89%, Points required for next Level: 357
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    hanger4's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    221647
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Mountains of WNC
    Posts
    43,200
    Points
    113,293
    Level
    81
    Thanks Given
    12,975
    Thanked 22,756x in 15,337 Posts
    Mentioned
    549 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cigar View Post
    Funny how that can't get pass that Fact.
    It's not a fact Cigar.
    It's ok if you disagree with me. I can't force you to be right.

  11. #29
    Points: 80,798, Level: 69
    Level completed: 32%, Points required for next Level: 1,652
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    del's Avatar Banned
    Karma
    1781014
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    30,663
    Points
    80,798
    Level
    69
    Thanks Given
    12,798
    Thanked 18,872x in 12,227 Posts
    Mentioned
    499 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by hanger4 View Post
    Mitch Mcconnell never said the President couldn't nominate.

    Don't know where you're getting your info from, but they sure are feeding you a bunch of BS.
    it's hard to take someone seriously who feels compelled to tell you how right they are in large bolded font.

    sorry, you're wrong

    frequently

    “The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president,”

    Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/0...#ixzz40Lc14a2o

    now you can parse this in whatever way makes you feel good, but it is a defacto claim that the current president has no right to nominate a new justice, and $#@! the constitution.


    btw, that's not rain on your boots, either

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to del For This Useful Post:

    nic34 (02-16-2016)

  13. #30
    Points: 36,417, Level: 46
    Level completed: 65%, Points required for next Level: 533
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Archer0915's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    56214
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    7,009
    Points
    36,417
    Level
    46
    Thanks Given
    3,252
    Thanked 2,215x in 1,682 Posts
    Mentioned
    48 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    Lookitup seems informed. Why is there any question about it?
    Ummm... It was meant to support your post. Perhaps I should have made that clear! Damn you for not being able to read my mind

    People should read that and if they take issue with it, deport themselves. This POS in the White House has walked all over the constitution.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Archer0915 For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (02-16-2016)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts