The Earth warms and cools. It apparently always has. If the government stops funding man-caused global warming research fewer researchers, always dependent upon government money, will have a reason to agree with the government, bought position.
1) The Earth warms and cools.
2) It apparently always has.
3) If the government stops funding man-caused global warming research fewer researchers, always dependent upon government money, will have a reason to agree with the government, bought position.
Which part confused you?
The Earth warms and cools. It apparently always has. If the government stops funding man-caused global warming research fewer researchers, always dependent upon government money, will have a reason to agree with the government, bought position.1) The Earth warms and cools.
2) It apparently always has.
3) If the government stops funding man-caused global warming research fewer researchers, always dependent upon government money, will have a reason to agree with the government, bought position.
Which part do you disagree with?
Last edited by MisterVeritis; 05-03-2016 at 11:53 AM. Reason: Software eliminated my line breaks.
3) If the government stops funding man-caused global warming research fewer researchers, always dependent upon government money, will have a reason to agree with the government, bought position.The government funds man-caused global warming research.
People who rely on government grants to prove man-caused global warming deliver what the government is after.
If the government stops funding man-caused global warming research, all of those concerned and paid for scientists will find useful work to do.
Safety (05-03-2016)