Alan Dershowitz: "Black Lives Matter Is Endangering The Fairness Of Our Legal System"

[Standing Wolf]

yes, the idea of race based outcomes is anathema to our legal system

if its the wrong race




http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/project...ice&bowers.htm

So what are you saying, del? That the outcome of court cases should depend on the race of the parties involved, just like it used to, only with a different race being favored? Sacrifice a few of one race and exonerate a few of the other race, just to placate the masses and create the illusion of equity?

Dershowitz was right; he is seeing the situation clearly and describing it honestly.

[Safety]

Martin brought his death upon himself.
Anthony was a cold blooded $#@!.
Peterson is a serial killer....
How and what has that to do with anything?

I'm guessing when Dershwitz brought OJ into the conversation he was trying to make it seem as if the glove didn't fit because an equal outcome was being searched for. There were other cases that he could have mentioned also, but....

[Mac-7]

Let's see here....we have an article saying black lives matter is using the justice system for "rooting for outcomes based on race", then OJ simpson is brought up.....

What about Zimmerman, Casey Anthony, Scott Peterson,....nevermind cause 'murica.

You sound very bitter for a black guy who has enjoyed 7 1/2 years of a black golfer in chief in the white house who liberals said was going to unify the races.

i guess that makes obumer a failure in all respects.

[del]

So what are you saying, del? That the outcome of court cases should depend on the race of the parties involved, just like it used to, only with a different race being favored? Sacrifice a few of one race and exonerate a few of the other race, just to placate the masses and create the illusion of equity?

Dershowitz was right; he is seeing the situation clearly and describing it honestly.

no, i'm saying the country has a history of exonerating whites and convicting blacks as a matter of course.

your attempt to put words in my mouth is noted and laughed at heartily, as is your opinion of dershowitz

have a lovely day

[Mister D]

no, i'm saying the country has a history of exonerating whites and convicting blacks as a matter of course.

your attempt to put words in my mouth is noted and laughed at heartily, as is your opinion of dershowitz

have a lovely day

He didn't put words in your mouth. What other reason could there have been for bringing that up? Did Dershowitz support jury nullification in the south? That can't be it so...

[Safety]

Zimmerman - yes, outcome (i.e. Zimmerman's conviction) very much being rooted for on the basis of his race.

Casey Anthony and Scott Peterson...how was race involved in either of those cases?

I agree, Zimmerman's outcome was being rooted for acquittal by the right because of who he shot. When race plays a part in what started the encounter, it can only also play a part as to how the sides root for their guy.

Anthony, Peterson didn't have the benefit of having race brought into the mix because they were white. The same for Robert Blake.

If the justice system worked for Zimmerman, then the same justice system worked for OJ. Although a black person better be rich and famous to achieve the same benefit of a doubt that Zimmerman received....

[Safety]

no, i'm saying the country has a history of exonerating whites and convicting blacks as a matter of course.

your attempt to put words in my mouth is noted and laughed at heartily, as is your opinion of dershowitz

have a lovely day

Any intelligent person that can read history should know that.

[Safety]

You sound very bitter for a black guy who has enjoyed 7 1/2 years of a black golfer in chief in the white house who liberals said was going to unify the races.

i guess that makes obumer a failure in all respects.

You and your buddies riding out tonight? How many crosses will ya'll be "planting"?

[Safety]

so, if you're black, and you murder, you should get a free ticket....jes cuz yer black......

.... reading is fundamental.

[Mister D]

Any intelligent person that can read history should know that.

We all know that. What difference does it make?