Find the platitude, Rufus.
Data from a US mortality follow-back survey were analyzed to determine whether having a firearm in the home increases the risk of a violent death in the home and whether risk varies by storage practice, type of gun, or number of guns in the home. Those persons with guns in the home were at greater risk than those without guns in the home of dying from a homicide in the home (adjusted odds ratio = 1.9, 95% confidence interval: 1.1, 3.4). They were also at greater risk of dying from a firearm homicide, but risk varied by age and whether the person was living with others at the time of death. The risk of dying from a suicide in the home was greater for males in homes with guns than for males without guns in the home (adjusted odds ratio = 10.4, 95% confidence interval: 5.8, 18.9). Persons with guns in the home were also more likely to have died from suicide committed with a firearm than from one committed by using a different method (adjusted odds ratio = 31.1, 95% confidence interval: 19.5, 49.6). Results show that regardless of storage practice, type of gun, or number of firearms in the home, having a gun in the home was associated with an increased risk of firearm homicide and firearm suicide in the home.
http://m.aje.oxfordjournals.org/content/160/10/929.fullu
Suicides are not relevant to discussions of public safety or gun control.
One, because there is a strong argument to be made that taking one's life is an individual right.
Two, because someone killing themselves with a gun doesn't present a significant threat to public safety.
And three, because there is little to no evidence that gun control will significantly reduce the rate at which people kill themselves.
The only reason you want to talk about suicides is because it makes the problem appear worse than it actually is.
But even if we are generous and allow you to insert suicides into the discussion, we're still talking about a measly 0.01% risk of being killed by a firearm.
In other words, statistically insignificant.
Power always thinks it has a great soul, and vast views, beyond the comprehension of the weak. And that it is doing God service when it is violating all His laws.
--John Adams
Power always thinks it has a great soul, and vast views, beyond the comprehension of the weak. And that it is doing God service when it is violating all His laws.
--John Adams
Because of suicides, which are entirely irrelevant to discussions about public safety and gun control.
However, gun-related homicides, which are relevant to discussions about public safety, are only marginally worse than in other developed countries, and the problem is confined almost exclusively to Democrat enclaves like Chicago and Detroit where there are already strict gun control laws.
So any way you look at it, you're dead wrong.
Power always thinks it has a great soul, and vast views, beyond the comprehension of the weak. And that it is doing God service when it is violating all His laws.
--John Adams
Power always thinks it has a great soul, and vast views, beyond the comprehension of the weak. And that it is doing God service when it is violating all His laws.
--John Adams
Power always thinks it has a great soul, and vast views, beyond the comprehension of the weak. And that it is doing God service when it is violating all His laws.
--John Adams