User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 48

Thread: New report: Global Warming stopped 16 years ago

  1. #11
    Original Ranter
    Points: 297,679, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 42.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Mister D's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    416525
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    117,861
    Points
    297,679
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    25,296
    Thanked 53,470x in 36,445 Posts
    Mentioned
    1102 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by head of joaquin View Post
    It's always fun to watch tea baggers attempt science by misreading newpaper articles.
    Care to elaborate?
    Whoever criticizes capitalism, while approving immigration, whose working class is its first victim, had better shut up. Whoever criticizes immigration, while remaining silent about capitalism, should do the same.


    ~Alain de Benoist


  2. #12
    Points: 44,255, Level: 51
    Level completed: 42%, Points required for next Level: 995
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation First ClassTagger First Class25000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteran
    Awards:
    User with most referrers
    Trinnity's Avatar Banned
    Karma
    4944
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    8,715
    Points
    44,255
    Level
    51
    Thanks Given
    2,348
    Thanked 1,832x in 1,323 Posts
    Mentioned
    66 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    AGW is a political agenda, that's all. Even the left has quit talking about it.

  3. #13
    Points: 665,235, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 90.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433309
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    197,543
    Points
    665,235
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    31,981
    Thanked 80,898x in 54,716 Posts
    Mentioned
    2011 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by head of joaquin View Post
    It's always fun to watch tea baggers attempt science by misreading newpaper articles.
    Did you have an argument, or just meaningless memes?

  4. #14
    Points: 10,263, Level: 24
    Level completed: 27%, Points required for next Level: 587
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    head of joaquin's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    -260
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    785
    Points
    10,263
    Level
    24
    Thanks Given
    17
    Thanked 25x in 23 Posts
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mister D View Post
    Care to elaborate?

    Yeah, reading an article from a newspaper isn't science, especially if the article doesn't say what you say it said.

    The scientific illiteracy of conservatives is at the point that it's hard to even explain basic math to them.
    "Romney's 47% comment is a country-club fantasy"

    - David Brooks

  5. #15
    Points: 10,263, Level: 24
    Level completed: 27%, Points required for next Level: 587
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    head of joaquin's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    -260
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    785
    Points
    10,263
    Level
    24
    Thanks Given
    17
    Thanked 25x in 23 Posts
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    Did you have an argument, or just meaningless memes?
    Actually the OP is a meme without an argument.

    1. Newspaper articles aren't science.

    2. The OP pretends that an article is science.

    3. The article doesn't say what the poster said it said.

    Is that good enough for ya? Another teabagger trash thread.

    I guess you didn't even bother to read the article or the comments. The article has been debunked.


    This article is a complete misrepresentation of the data collected by the Met Office¿s Hadley Centre. The Met office has refuted the claims this article has made and accuses its backers of cherry picking data to meet their politically motivated agenda. In effect a blatant lie. Anthropogenic Global Warming is real and the temperature will continue to rise as humans continue to release CO2 into the atmosphere unabated. Dr. Jones is in agreement. Dr.Curry's claims are flawed and incorrect.

    It's almost as if the OP were lying on purpose.
    Last edited by head of joaquin; 10-15-2012 at 08:41 PM.
    "Romney's 47% comment is a country-club fantasy"

    - David Brooks

  6. #16
    Points: 665,235, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 90.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433309
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    197,543
    Points
    665,235
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    31,981
    Thanked 80,898x in 54,716 Posts
    Mentioned
    2011 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by head of joaquin View Post
    Actually the OP is a meme without an argument.

    1. Newspaper articles aren't science.

    2. The OP pretends that an article is science.

    3. The article doesn't say what the poster said it said.

    Is that good enough for ya? Another teabagger trash thread.

    I guess you didn't even bother to read the article or the comments. The article has been debunked.


    This article is a complete misrepresentation of the data collected by the Met Office¿s Hadley Centre. The Met office has refuted the claims this article has made and accuses its backers of cherry picking data to meet their politically motivated agenda. In effect a blatant lie. Anthropogenic Global Warming is real and the temperature will continue to rise as humans continue to release CO2 into the atmosphere unabated. Dr. Jones is in agreement. Dr.Curry's claims are flawed and incorrect.

    It's almost as if the OP were lying on purpose.
    1 Learn what meme means.

    2 The OP reported science.

    3 You would need to read the article to know what it says.

    Is that good enough for ya?
    Where's your argument, you know, facts and logic--they seem to escape your post.

    This article is a complete misrepresentation...
    Where'd you get that, a newspaper?

    It's almost as if the OP were lying on purpose.
    Oh, boy, another argument that rests on it's so because I believe it's so.


    Endless troll.

  7. #17
    Points: 10,263, Level: 24
    Level completed: 27%, Points required for next Level: 587
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    head of joaquin's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    -260
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    785
    Points
    10,263
    Level
    24
    Thanks Given
    17
    Thanked 25x in 23 Posts
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    1 Learn what meme means.

    2 The OP reported science.

    3 You would need to read the article to know what it says.



    Where's your argument, you know, facts and logic--they seem to escape your post.



    Where'd you get that, a newspaper?



    Oh, boy, another argument that rests on it's so because I believe it's so.


    Endless troll.
    Jesus, you've been owned and this is the best you can do.

    The article was debunked. You're going to have to get a new one from a rightwing website. Sorry to give you more work, but you teabaggers need something to do.

    http://mediamatters.org/research/201...science/190630

    NEXT!
    Last edited by head of joaquin; 10-15-2012 at 08:57 PM.
    "Romney's 47% comment is a country-club fantasy"

    - David Brooks

  8. #18
    Points: 665,235, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 90.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433309
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    197,543
    Points
    665,235
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    31,981
    Thanked 80,898x in 54,716 Posts
    Mentioned
    2011 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by head of joaquin View Post
    Jesus, you've been owned and this is the best you can do.

    The article was debunked. You're going to have to get a new one from a rightwing website. Sorry to give you more work, but you teabaggers need something to do.
    Where's your argument, facts and logic, rather than constant trolling.

  9. #19
    Points: 665,235, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 90.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433309
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    197,543
    Points
    665,235
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    31,981
    Thanked 80,898x in 54,716 Posts
    Mentioned
    2011 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    And here, ladies and gents, is what's left of global warming er cooling er change:

    Over at Science Blogs, Greg Laden is reporting that Penn State climatologist Michael Mann is suing the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) and the National Review for refusing to apologize for comparing him in a blog post to child molester Jerry Sandusky. In the original post on CEI's Opermarket website apparently read:

    “Mann could be said to be the Jerry Sandusky of climate science, except that instead of molesting children, he has molested and tortured data in the service of politicized science.”
    Harsh, indeed. That offending line has since been removed from the post, with a disclosure noting "Two inappropriate sentences that originally appeared in this post have been removed by the editor." National Review (NR) is being sued because NR contributor Mark Steyn cited the CEI post over at NR's The Corner blog. For what it's worth, Steyn did write:

    Not sure I’d have extended that metaphor all the way into the locker-room showers with quite the zeal Mr Simberg does...
    However Steyn did add:

    ... but he has a point.
    ...
    @ Hockeystick Climatologist Michael Mann Sues Competitive Enterprise Institute and national review for Defamation

  10. #20
    Original Ranter
    Points: 858,965, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 92.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    496535
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    241,669
    Points
    858,965
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,211
    Thanked 147,545x in 94,399 Posts
    Mentioned
    2552 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    He will be paying his lawyers a lot of money to lose....

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts