AGW is a political agenda, that's all. Even the left has quit talking about it.
"Romney's 47% comment is a country-club fantasy"
- David Brooks
Actually the OP is a meme without an argument.
1. Newspaper articles aren't science.
2. The OP pretends that an article is science.
3. The article doesn't say what the poster said it said.
Is that good enough for ya? Another teabagger trash thread.
I guess you didn't even bother to read the article or the comments. The article has been debunked.
This article is a complete misrepresentation of the data collected by the Met Office¿s Hadley Centre. The Met office has refuted the claims this article has made and accuses its backers of cherry picking data to meet their politically motivated agenda. In effect a blatant lie. Anthropogenic Global Warming is real and the temperature will continue to rise as humans continue to release CO2 into the atmosphere unabated. Dr. Jones is in agreement. Dr.Curry's claims are flawed and incorrect.
It's almost as if the OP were lying on purpose.
Last edited by head of joaquin; 10-15-2012 at 08:41 PM.
"Romney's 47% comment is a country-club fantasy"
- David Brooks
1 Learn what meme means.
2 The OP reported science.
3 You would need to read the article to know what it says.
Where's your argument, you know, facts and logic--they seem to escape your post.Is that good enough for ya?
Where'd you get that, a newspaper?This article is a complete misrepresentation...
Oh, boy, another argument that rests on it's so because I believe it's so.It's almost as if the OP were lying on purpose.
Endless troll.
Jesus, you've been owned and this is the best you can do.
The article was debunked. You're going to have to get a new one from a rightwing website. Sorry to give you more work, but you teabaggers need something to do.
http://mediamatters.org/research/201...science/190630
NEXT!
Last edited by head of joaquin; 10-15-2012 at 08:57 PM.
"Romney's 47% comment is a country-club fantasy"
- David Brooks
And here, ladies and gents, is what's left of global warming er cooling er change:
@ Hockeystick Climatologist Michael Mann Sues Competitive Enterprise Institute and national review for DefamationOver at Science Blogs, Greg Laden is reporting that Penn State climatologist Michael Mann is suing the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) and the National Review for refusing to apologize for comparing him in a blog post to child molester Jerry Sandusky. In the original post on CEI's Opermarket website apparently read:
Harsh, indeed. That offending line has since been removed from the post, with a disclosure noting "Two inappropriate sentences that originally appeared in this post have been removed by the editor." National Review (NR) is being sued because NR contributor Mark Steyn cited the CEI post over at NR's The Corner blog. For what it's worth, Steyn did write:“Mann could be said to be the Jerry Sandusky of climate science, except that instead of molesting children, he has molested and tortured data in the service of politicized science.”
However Steyn did add:Not sure I’d have extended that metaphor all the way into the locker-room showers with quite the zeal Mr Simberg does...
...... but he has a point.
He will be paying his lawyers a lot of money to lose....