User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: Some questions for Republicans

  1. #1
    Points: 7,196, Level: 20
    Level completed: 21%, Points required for next Level: 554
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    Individual's Avatar Junior Member
    Karma
    2968
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    65
    Points
    7,196
    Level
    20
    Thanks Given
    41
    Thanked 37x in 26 Posts
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Some questions for Republicans

    Media Darling, aka Donald Trump, has “won” the election. He came out of nowhere and at the last minute swept to victory in a scene reminiscent of Dewey V Truman, or any Rocky movie. Hillary Clinton had a huge lead for a year, a lead that she did not relinquish after the debates. Then, about a week before the election, the poll numbers began to change, even though nothing new happened in the campaign. That ten percent swing in the poll numbers really couldn’t have come at a more convenient time for you. It really is...shall we say…unbelievable.

    So answer me this:

    Why did so many people, for no apparent reason, suddenly abandon a candidate they had supported for a year and switch to a candidate whose policies they abhor? Can you give one plausible, intelligent reason why so many people had this inexplicable change of heart at the last minute?

    There are some people who have an answer.

    Here’s an article from a progressive publication that supplies an answer. I know all the Republicans will automatically want to dismiss it, but it is a well documented article if you care to go through the footnotes.

    http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0601-34.htm


    Clint Curtis has an answer.



    And here’s an interesting answer from retired NSA analyst Michael Duniho. (Republicans may not want to read this article as it brings very bad news about the elections of 2008 and 2012.)

    http://readersupportednews.org/news-...ections-part-i

    Michael Connell also had an answer, but he was killed when his private plane crashed before he could give his answer in court.

    If we look at the “results” from this election and we flip the numbers by ten percent we arrive at pretty much the same numbers we were showing after the debates.

    What’s your answer for this conveniently timed and suspicious number? Do you have one that doesn’t involve words like “tin foil hat” or “crybaby” or “sore loser”? I have an article that presents proof for all of its statements, a video of testimony by the guy who wrote the prototype for the vote changing program, and an article where a former NSA analyst gives you the formula you need to verify election results yourself so you don’t have to take his word for it. Will you answer by pointing to a “news” article where your Media Darling’s fellow media shills simply run their mouth with claims of fraud against them without offering anything in the way of proof? Do you have an intelligent answer as to why so many people changed their mind at the last minute even though nothing new happened in the campaign?

    We’re trying to live in a society where the voice of the people actually matters. Does the voice of the people matter to you? Or do you only care that the Red Party wins? Take a step up in life. Make the transition from Red back to Republican. Give an intelligent answer. The continued existence of this country may depend on it.
    If you don't know what communism is then how do you know you're not a communist?

  2. #2
    Points: 33,845, Level: 44
    Level completed: 93%, Points required for next Level: 105
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    Subdermal's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    184660
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    11,998
    Points
    33,845
    Level
    44
    Thanks Given
    13,718
    Thanked 5,374x in 3,871 Posts
    Mentioned
    128 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    "Media darling" Donald Trump?



    From what planet are you?

    The same cognitive dissonance which has you conclude that Trump was some sort of 'media darling' () is the same fugue in which you're paralyzed into thinking that - somehow - those polls were ever accurate.

    The same media which 'darlinged' (lol) Trump was the same one which attempted to use the polls to boost morale of Hillary voters, and demoralize support for Trump.

    I cannot abide by your fiction.
    Last edited by Subdermal; 11-10-2016 at 12:23 PM.

  3. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Subdermal For This Useful Post:

    Axiomatic (11-13-2016),MisterVeritis (11-13-2016)

  4. #3
    Original Ranter
    Points: 314,886, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second Class50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteranYour first Group
    Captain Obvious's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    773942
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    80,473
    Points
    314,886
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    30,199
    Thanked 40,087x in 27,208 Posts
    Mentioned
    1041 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    This guy thinks voting matters...



    No Virginia, Santa is dead.

  5. #4
    Points: 445,632, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    Common's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    339120
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    66,766
    Points
    445,632
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    8,788
    Thanked 18,323x in 10,925 Posts
    Mentioned
    396 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Conpiracy theories will thrive, However you missed the real reasons her numbers dropped or intentionally omitted them.

    First she never had the huge leads being reported by liberal media and flawed Polls.
    The week before the election comey reopened the email investigation because they found thousands of emails on humas computer which they had confiscated while investigation her husband weiner for sexting with 12 yr old girls. Many of those emails contained classified informat.

    When that was brought out people finally realize there is no end to Clinton lies and crimes.
    But if you read a variety and sites and not just left hit sites, you will find all the pollsters admit they were wrong all along and hillary was never that far ahead
    LETS GO BRANDON
    F Joe Biden

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Common For This Useful Post:

    Subdermal (11-10-2016)

  7. #5
    Points: 122,776, Level: 84
    Level completed: 98%, Points required for next Level: 74
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsTagger Second ClassVeteran
    Safety's Avatar Nationalist
    Karma
    2616415
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    GA/FL
    Posts
    50,789
    Points
    122,776
    Level
    84
    Thanks Given
    25,014
    Thanked 22,901x in 15,599 Posts
    Mentioned
    1237 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    "New evidence found in email from Weiner's computer related to Hilliary" a few days before the election would probably have an effect...

  8. #6
    Points: 445,632, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    Common's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    339120
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    66,766
    Points
    445,632
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    8,788
    Thanked 18,323x in 10,925 Posts
    Mentioned
    396 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Subdermal View Post
    "Media darling" Donald Trump?



    From what planet are you?

    The same cognitive dissonance which has you conclude that Trump was some sort of 'media darling' () is the same fugue in which you're paralyzed into thinking that - somehow - those polls were ever accurate.

    The same media which 'darlinged' (lol) Trump was the same one which attempted to use the polls to boost morale of Hillary voters, and demoralize support for Trump.

    I cannot abide by your fiction.
    That was so silly I just didnt even mention it
    LETS GO BRANDON
    F Joe Biden

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Common For This Useful Post:

    Subdermal (11-10-2016)

  10. #7
    Points: 445,632, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    Common's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    339120
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    66,766
    Points
    445,632
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    8,788
    Thanked 18,323x in 10,925 Posts
    Mentioned
    396 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Safety View Post
    "New evidence found in email from Weiner's computer related to Hilliary" a few days before the election would probably have an effect...
    Thank you for being honest and yes comey reopening the investigation also had an effect. Like I posted even the pollsters admit they were wrong all along.

    The only two that had it right the day before the election was the LATimes and Nate Silvers site
    LETS GO BRANDON
    F Joe Biden

  11. #8
    Points: 33,845, Level: 44
    Level completed: 93%, Points required for next Level: 105
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    Subdermal's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    184660
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    11,998
    Points
    33,845
    Level
    44
    Thanks Given
    13,718
    Thanked 5,374x in 3,871 Posts
    Mentioned
    128 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Safety View Post
    "New evidence found in email from Weiner's computer related to Hilliary" a few days before the election would probably have an effect...
    Was it not? Was it not found?

  12. #9
    Points: 122,776, Level: 84
    Level completed: 98%, Points required for next Level: 74
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsTagger Second ClassVeteran
    Safety's Avatar Nationalist
    Karma
    2616415
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    GA/FL
    Posts
    50,789
    Points
    122,776
    Level
    84
    Thanks Given
    25,014
    Thanked 22,901x in 15,599 Posts
    Mentioned
    1237 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Subdermal View Post
    Was it not? Was it not found?
    Don't know, it's water under the bridge now, but I was just answering a question.

  13. #10
    Points: 7,196, Level: 20
    Level completed: 21%, Points required for next Level: 554
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    Individual's Avatar Junior Member
    Karma
    2968
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    65
    Points
    7,196
    Level
    20
    Thanks Given
    41
    Thanked 37x in 26 Posts
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wow. These replies came so fast. You must be quick readers to have read all the evidence this fast.

    So now your claim is that every poll was wrong until the last days of the election? The bottom line is the polls showed the numbers one way and then began to show different numbers just before the election. And you think the ones that disagreed with you were wrong but the ones that agreed with you were right. So if these people found out their polls were wrong for such a long time, how did they find out and what method did they use to take their "accurate" polls just days before the election? Yes, someone ran his mouth that he was wrong all along and then suddenly found a way to be accurate just days before the election. What proof does he give to back up his flapping mouth? How did they discover their polls were in error and what method did they use to suddenly be "accurate"?

    I asked for an intelligent answer. Try reading the evidence. (There's plenty more where it came from.) And then give me one good reason why so many people would change their mind for no reason.
    If you don't know what communism is then how do you know you're not a communist?

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts