Clearly, Clinton would have been a better choice.

[AZ Jim]

`
`

I love the song but not the falsetto voice. I like women's voices but only when a woman is using it.

[DGUtley]

Clearly? Clearly? I saw that Trump's approval rating has gone up. I wonder if this means that the general public have liked the picks.

[jimmyz]

It's now pretty clear, based on Trump's cabinet picks and post-election behavior, that Hillary Clinton would have been an infinitely better choice. It's a shame she was the choice, but she would have at least surrounded herself with sane, competent people. Not people who are trying to elevate a white nationalist agenda (Bannon), wage war on Muslims and spread LIES to the American people (Flynn), throw shade on science and try to dismantle environmental protections because they are in the pocket of big oil (Pruitt), or wants to suppress minimum wage (Puzder). Did I miss any other dejects or rejects?

!

Trump was BRILLIANT in making the election about personality and insults rather than issues. Otherwise he could not have won.

Expect lower or stagnant wages, less environment protection, more reliance on fossil fuels, more corporate welfare (on top of tax cuts, which will do nothing but blow a hole in the debt). Trump is actively trying to cause international incidents, and it's only a matter of time before he pokes the wrong bear.

I thought the election was a dumpster fire. We're now experiencing a Trumpster fire, and it hasn't even started.

I feel your pain man. And it feels GOOD

[Soyuz22]

No, Clinton would not have been a better choice, and let me tell you why in one phrase - Us and Them.

Her views on Russia, her attitudes towards them - that would have been a disaster. Clinton has always, ALWAYS, been a hawk. She's the quintessential example of outdated and dangerous foreign policy. She's stuck in the mid-20th century Evil Empire, Us and Them ideology that led on so many occasions to the very real and terrifying possibility of nuclear confrontation. I completely believe that her Presidency would lead us into another cold war, especially in this crucial time. Trump may be an unpredictable driver, but at least he isn't trying to make us crash. I am happy that she lost. Ecstatic, even.

[resister]

Why not sit some of this out? You constantly have to troll?

I only troll those that troll me.I don't troll you do I?

[pjohns]

Trump is actively trying to cause international incidents, and it's only a matter of time before he pokes the wrong bear.

Ironically, international relations is the one (and only) area in which I more agreed with Hillary Clinton, since she seemed to take a much tougher stance here. (Donald Trump--whom I much prefer in most other ways--seems rather conciliatory to our adversaries here--especially to Russia--whereas Hillary Clinton seems rather confrontational in this regard.)

In fact, one tabloid (I think it was the National Enquirer; but I am not certain) went as far as to run a headline suggesting that WWIII was inevitable if Hillary Clinton were to win the presidency.

Vladimir Putin even intoned that "If it's Hillary Clinton, its war."

[Common]

I laughed when I read the thread title, I mean really lol

[MisterVeritis]

This is an exercise in futility.

Crooked lost.

[Amadeus]

Her views on Russia, her attitudes towards them - that would have been a disaster. Clinton has always, ALWAYS, been a hawk.

I agree, and that's why I didn't support her. That said, Clinton framed it very well. Putin is more afraid of a president than a puppet. Putin know how to roll Trump, so should most leaders at this point. And if Russia doesn't want to be treated like an evil empire, it should stop acting like one.

[resister]

This is an exercise in futility.

Crooked lost.

The worlds biggest preparation h factory can't keep up with demand*breaking*