User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Gender Gap Near Historic Highs

  1. #1
    Points: 200,913, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 67.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdrive50000 Experience Points1 year registered
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Cigar's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    22392
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Land of Lincoln
    Posts
    40,725
    Points
    200,913
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    1,050
    Thanked 3,977x in 3,268 Posts
    Mentioned
    675 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    266

    Cool Gender Gap Near Historic Highs

    If only women voted, President Obama would be on track for a landslide re-election, equaling or exceeding his margin of victory over John McCain in 2008. Mr. Obama would be an overwhelming favorite in Ohio, Florida, Virginia and most every other place that is conventionally considered a swing state. The only question would be whether he could forge ahead into traditionally red states, like Georgia, Montana and Arizona.

    If only men voted, Mr. Obama would be biding his time until a crushing defeat at the hands of Mitt Romney, who might win by a similar margin to the one Ronald Reagan realized over Jimmy Carter in 1980. Only California, Illinois, Hawaii and a few states in the Northeast could be considered safely Democratic. Every other state would lean red, or would at least be a toss-up.

    Although polls disagree on the exact magnitude of the gender gap (and a couple of recent ones seemed to show Mitt Romney eliminating the presidentís advantage with women voters), the consensus of surveys points to a large one this year ó rivaling the biggest from past elections.

    The gender gap is nothing new in American politics. Since 1972, when exit polling became widespread, men and women split their votes in three elections: 1996, 2000, and 2004. They came close to doing so on several other occasions. In 2008, for example, Mr. Obama won resoundingly among women, beating Mr. McCain by 13 points, but only won by a single point among men.

    See charts in link: http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes...er=rss&emc=rss
    Whenever you think of giving up, just think of all the people who would Love to see you FAIL

    Its origin has been embedded in this nationís consciousness since the Nat Turner revolt; a pathological fear that the oppressed will one day rise up and inflict vengeance upon the oppressor.

  2. #2

    tPF Moderator
    Original Ranter
    V.I.P
    Points: 235,988, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Peter1469's Avatar Moderator Representative
    Karma
    54647
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    49,752
    Points
    235,988
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    22,040
    Thanked 15,902x in 11,638 Posts
    Mentioned
    1049 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    599
    Women tend to be more agreeable to a paternalistic government managing life from cradle to grave, than men. It is certainly an argument against the 19th Amendment.

  3. #3
    Points: 200,913, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 67.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdrive50000 Experience Points1 year registered
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Cigar's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    22392
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Land of Lincoln
    Posts
    40,725
    Points
    200,913
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    1,050
    Thanked 3,977x in 3,268 Posts
    Mentioned
    675 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    266
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    Women tend to be more agreeable to a paternalistic government managing life from cradle to grave, than men. It is certainly an argument against the 19th Amendment.


    Some of them have better bodies also ... some of them, not most of them
    Whenever you think of giving up, just think of all the people who would Love to see you FAIL

    Its origin has been embedded in this nationís consciousness since the Nat Turner revolt; a pathological fear that the oppressed will one day rise up and inflict vengeance upon the oppressor.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Cigar For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (10-22-2012)

  5. #4
    Points: 684, Level: 5
    Level completed: 67%, Points required for next Level: 66
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    31 days registered500 Experience Points
    pollycy's Avatar Junior Member
    Karma
    260
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    47
    Points
    684
    Level
    5
    Thanks Given
    10
    Thanked 44x in 26 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by Cigar View Post
    If only women voted, President Obama would be on track for a landslide re-election, equaling or exceeding his margin of victory over John McCain in 2008. Mr. Obama would be an overwhelming favorite in Ohio, Florida, Virginia and most every other place that is conventionally considered a swing state. The only question would be whether he could forge ahead into traditionally red states, like Georgia, Montana and Arizona.

    If only men voted, Mr. Obama would be biding his time until a crushing defeat at the hands of Mitt Romney, who might win by a similar margin to the one Ronald Reagan realized over Jimmy Carter in 1980. Only California, Illinois, Hawaii and a few states in the Northeast could be considered safely Democratic. Every other state would lean red, or would at least be a toss-up.

    Although polls disagree on the exact magnitude of the gender gap (and a couple of recent ones seemed to show Mitt Romney eliminating the presidentís advantage with women voters), the consensus of surveys points to a large one this year ó rivaling the biggest from past elections.

    The gender gap is nothing new in American politics. Since 1972, when exit polling became widespread, men and women split their votes in three elections: 1996, 2000, and 2004. They came close to doing so on several other occasions. In 2008, for example, Mr. Obama won resoundingly among women, beating Mr. McCain by 13 points, but only won by a single point among men.

    See charts in link: http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes...er=rss&emc=rss
    This really stumps me, because "women" are no more (or less) stupid (as a group) than men. Obama is an negligent, incompetent moron, and I don't need to have a pair of testicles to know this. But then (if it is true) what is there about being equipped with ovaries that blinds so many women to being able to see right through this jive-ass clown?

    Some of the smartest people I have known in my entire life have been women -- and I'm fortunate to be married to one of the very most intelligent women I've ever met. My wife is completely revolted and disgusted by Obama... hell, she formed a negative opinion of him even before I did -- early in 2008.

    But, take your "average" guy, and your "average" gal in America. Why would so many more women prefer Obama over Romney? Try as hard as I may, I just cannot fathom this in anything based in either logic or reason. Can anyone else?
    It's over. Prepare for the worst and you won't be far wrong. By about the end of Q2, 2013, it will be starkly clear that we have been permanently ruined.

  6. #5
    Points: 684, Level: 5
    Level completed: 67%, Points required for next Level: 66
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    31 days registered500 Experience Points
    pollycy's Avatar Junior Member
    Karma
    260
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    47
    Points
    684
    Level
    5
    Thanks Given
    10
    Thanked 44x in 26 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by pollycy View Post
    This really stumps me, because "women" are no more (or less) stupid (as a group) than men. Obama is an negligent, incompetent moron, and I don't need to have a pair of testicles to know this. But then (if it is true) what is there about being equipped with ovaries that blinds so many women to being able to see right through this jive-ass clown?

    Some of the smartest people I have known in my entire life have been women -- and I'm fortunate to be married to one of the very most intelligent women I've ever met. My wife is completely revolted and disgusted by Obama... hell, she formed a negative opinion of him even before I did -- early in 2008.

    But, take your "average" guy, and your "average" gal in America. Why would so many more women prefer Obama over Romney? Try as hard as I may, I just cannot fathom this in anything based in either logic or reason. Can anyone else?
    As I re-read my post in the hindsight view from November 10th, I still ask the same question: Why would so many more women prefer Obama over Romney (or anyone else with more than a notochord for a brain)?

    It's no longer a matter of blaming Obama -- the fault is OURS. What has happened to us, the American people, that we have become so easily manipulated by this public-relations creation, this THING, that the Insiders successfully installed in the White House? If nothing else, I thought that because so many women now have to be the primary wage-earners for their families, they'd abandon the jive-ass nothingness of Obama and his rotten record in office and ally themselves with a successful businessperson who knows economics and the processes of government very well. I really thought that most American women had more sense than this... especially after all we've been through since back in the final miserable Bush years, all the way through Comrade Obama's first four years. Now, we are RUINED....
    It's over. Prepare for the worst and you won't be far wrong. By about the end of Q2, 2013, it will be starkly clear that we have been permanently ruined.

  7. #6
    Points: 25,712, Level: 39
    Level completed: 5%, Points required for next Level: 1,238
    Overall activity: 17.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered25000 Experience Points
    Kabuki Joe's Avatar Banned
    Karma
    5035
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    4,321
    Points
    25,712
    Level
    39
    Thanks Given
    2,015
    Thanked 758x in 591 Posts
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by pollycy View Post
    This really stumps me, because "women" are no more (or less) stupid (as a group) than men. Obama is an negligent, incompetent moron, and I don't need to have a pair of testicles to know this. But then (if it is true) what is there about being equipped with ovaries that blinds so many women to being able to see right through this jive-ass clown?

    Some of the smartest people I have known in my entire life have been women -- and I'm fortunate to be married to one of the very most intelligent women I've ever met. My wife is completely revolted and disgusted by Obama... hell, she formed a negative opinion of him even before I did -- early in 2008.

    But, take your "average" guy, and your "average" gal in America. Why would so many more women prefer Obama over Romney? Try as hard as I may, I just cannot fathom this in anything based in either logic or reason. Can anyone else?
    ...when men see freaks we say "ewwwwwwww"...when women see freaks they say "awwwwwwwwwh"...


    Kabuki Joe

  8. #7
    Points: 11,465, Level: 25
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 285
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdrive1 year registered10000 Experience Points
    truthmatters's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    -689
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    4,478
    Points
    11,465
    Level
    25
    Thanks Given
    324
    Thanked 125x in 113 Posts
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    because there are fewer women who are sociopaths than men

  9. #8

    tPF Moderator
    Original Ranter
    V.I.P
    Points: 235,988, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Peter1469's Avatar Moderator Representative
    Karma
    54647
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    49,752
    Points
    235,988
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    22,040
    Thanked 15,902x in 11,638 Posts
    Mentioned
    1049 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    599
    Quote Originally Posted by pollycy View Post
    As I re-read my post in the hindsight view from November 10th, I still ask the same question: Why would so many more women prefer Obama over Romney (or anyone else with more than a notochord for a brain)?

    It's no longer a matter of blaming Obama -- the fault is OURS. What has happened to us, the American people, that we have become so easily manipulated by this public-relations creation, this THING, that the Insiders successfully installed in the White House? If nothing else, I thought that because so many women now have to be the primary wage-earners for their families, they'd abandon the jive-ass nothingness of Obama and his rotten record in office and ally themselves with a successful businessperson who knows economics and the processes of government very well. I really thought that most American women had more sense than this... especially after all we've been through since back in the final miserable Bush years, all the way through Comrade Obama's first four years. Now, we are RUINED....
    Most democrats are single issue voters based on identity politics. Many women believed that Romney wanted to rape them and not pay for their abortions. Obama ran a negative campaign.

  10. #9
    Points: 6,787, Level: 19
    Level completed: 63%, Points required for next Level: 263
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    3 months registered5000 Experience Points
    Taxcutter's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    905
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    767
    Points
    6,787
    Level
    19
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanked 197x in 137 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    12
    Does this not make women complicit in Hussein Obama's atrocities?

  11. #10
    Points: 187,343, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive1 year registered50000 Experience PointsTagger First Class
    Awards:
    Frequent Poster
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    26984
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    55,070
    Points
    187,343
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    4,033
    Thanked 10,145x in 7,949 Posts
    Mentioned
    558 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    327
    The OP's premise is BS. The statistical abstraction is at a level all but meaningless.

    From @ Why Demographics Can't Fully Predict How People Vote
    ...From the large sample interviewed by the major media's exit polling consortium, we can see that simple demography can make some very strong predictions. At the extreme, with just two data points—race and gender—we can guess how a person voted 96 percent of the time, if she's a black woman.



    But that doesn't tell us why people voted the way they did....

    In real life, even with people we don't know personally, the cues we get from interactions and behavior explain more than simple demographics, although they all go into the quick mix of judgments we are forced to form on short notice throughout the day. In statistical terms, the basic demographic variables leave a lot of variance unexplained....

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Forum Topsite Critical Acclaim
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO