Yes, I do. I think it's a net positive for the country.
It doesn't "expressly forbid" anything of the sort and calling it "seizing" is hyperbolic.Of course, your argument in support of it is utterly specious, and willfully ignores the very clear text in the Constitution which expressly forbids the FedGov from seizing land annexed within a State's borders for things like Parks.
Yeah, whatever you say.If you simply rely on pressure and ignorance to force your agenda, you'll forgive us if we rely on taking you out to enforce ours.
There's no difference, right?