Pete was on the right track.The women's manifesto claims that that women's rights have been deteriorating for 30 years, so I have to wonder where they were when Obama was in office. When Clinton was in office?
https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...sistance-power What we're seeing here is bandwagon riding -- nothing more. We've got a couple of long-in-the-tooth 70s radicals trying to whip up a revolution based on fantasy. In the past 30 years (in real life) women have made great strides in both the work place and in society. These women are a slap in the face to everything true women stand for. These women want to enact communist-style labor laws that reduce women (and humans in general) to the shuffling masses once seen in the former USSR. They're using a very old ruse -- trying to convince women that they're victims so they can use their warm bodies to spread their message. A message that opposes a Free Market society. To me -- these women are trash. Dangerous, perhaps, but mostly just trash. They are old radicals that were never successful and now they want to try again by riding the bandwagon that's risen against Trump. Their manifesto is far-flung -- they're attempting to equate violence in Latin America to US life, and abortion bans in Poland to reproductive rights in the US. And one of them is a murderer of innocents. They want free healthcare -- guaranteed jobs -- and they are anti-male to a large degree. To me -- and this is just my personal opinion -- these women represent weakness. They represent failure. They represent the worst of what it is to be female. They don't have a clue what it takes to be successful as a female. Thanks but I'll pass...