Meet the terrorist behind the next women’s march

[Peter1469]

Meet the terrorist behind the next women’s march

The day without women is being organized by a convicted terrorist. That should get little to no coverage by the MSM.

On March 8, organizers seem to be aiming for a different vibe than the librarians-in-$#@!-hats element that made the first women’s march after Trump’s inauguration so adorable.

Instead of milling around Washington, organizers have in mind a “general strike” called the Day without a Woman. In a manifesto published in The Guardian on Feb. 6, the brains behind the movement are calling for a “new wave of militant feminist struggle.” That’s right: militant, not peaceful.


The document was co-authored by, among others, Rasmea Yousef Odeh, a convicted terrorist. Odeh, a Palestinian, was convicted in Israel in 1970 for her part in two terrorist bombings, one of which killed two students while they were shopping for groceries. She spent 10 years in prison for her crimes. She then managed to become a US citizen in 2004 by lying about her past (great detective work, INS: Next time, use Google) but was subsequently convicted, in 2014, of immigration fraud for the falsehoods. However, she won the right to a new trial (set for this spring) by claiming she had been suffering from PTSD at the time she lied on her application. Oh, and in her time as a citizen, she worked for a while as an ObamaCare navigator.

Other organizers are no less ambitious:

You can see why she’s a hero to the left. Another co-author, Angela Davis, is a Stalinist professor and longtime supporter of the Black Panthers. Davis is best known for being acquitted in a 1972 trial after three guns she bought were used in a courtroom shootout that resulted in the death of a judge. She celebrated by going to Cuba.

A third co-author, Tithi Bhattacharya, praised Maoism in an essay for the International Socialist Review, noting that Maoists are “on the terrorist list of the US State Department, Canada, and the European Union,” which she called an indication that “Maoists are back in the news and by all accounts they are fighting against all the right people.” You know you’re dealing with extremism when someone admits to hating Canada.

[Tahuyaman]

Meet the terrorist behind the next women’s march


The day without women is being organized by a convicted terrorist. That should get little to no coverage by the MSM.

Other organizers are no less ambitious:

She looks like she's straight out of Tales From The Crypt.

[Green Arrow]

Well-poisoning is beneath you, Pete.

[Peter1469]

Well-poisoning is beneath you, Pete.

It is not well poisoning.

[AeonPax]

`
`
I'm not into extremism but I do support the general idealistic concepts this march represents.

[Peter1469]

It will be interesting to watch.

[patrickt]

For liberals, telling the truth is poisoning the well. I would consider having these people teaching in a university as far more serious poisoning of the well.

[decedent]

For liberals, telling the truth is poisoning the well.

At least you don't generalize.

I would consider having these people teaching in a university as far more serious poisoning of the well.

Yes. Yes, you would.

[stjames1_53]

Well-poisoning is beneath you, Pete.

women are marching for what they already gotten. They, too, have lost nothing with this latest election. Trump is going to take nothing away from them.
I wouldn't be surprised if he actually helped women in the work force get better money as a result of his economic policies. That being said, the economy has to stabilize and start improving before this can happen and it's going to take more than 60 days in office to fix this. Let's give him time and see.....

[FindersKeepers]

Well-poisoning is beneath you, Pete.

Pete was on the right track.
The women's manifesto claims that that women's rights have been deteriorating for 30 years, so I have to wonder where they were when Obama was in office. When Clinton was in office?

Women’s conditions of life, especially those of women of color and of working, unemployed and migrant women, have steadily deteriorated over the last 30 years, thanks to financialization and corporate globalization.

https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...sistance-power

What we're seeing here is bandwagon riding -- nothing more. We've got a couple of long-in-the-tooth 70s radicals trying to whip up a revolution based on fantasy. In the past 30 years (in real life) women have made great strides in both the work place and in society.

These women are a slap in the face to everything true women stand for. These women want to enact communist-style labor laws that reduce women (and humans in general) to the shuffling masses once seen in the former USSR.

They're using a very old ruse -- trying to convince women that they're victims so they can use their warm bodies to spread their message. A message that opposes a Free Market society.

To me -- these women are trash. Dangerous, perhaps, but mostly just trash. They are old radicals that were never successful and now they want to try again by riding the bandwagon that's risen against Trump. Their manifesto is far-flung -- they're attempting to equate violence in Latin America to US life, and abortion bans in Poland to reproductive rights in the US. And one of them is a murderer of innocents.

They want free healthcare -- guaranteed jobs -- and they are anti-male to a large degree.

To me -- and this is just my personal opinion -- these women represent weakness. They represent failure. They represent the worst of what it is to be female.

They don't have a clue what it takes to be successful as a female.

Thanks but I'll pass...