A single hurricane in October proves Global Warming?
The first snowfall then disproves it.
There were Herbivore Dinosaurs and the vegetation to support them between 400 to 1200 miles from the North Pole about 60 Million years ago. The fossilized remains of both don't lie. Something cause the Earth to warm to that extent, man didn't exist and the fossils for oil were still walking around and growing from the ground. So what caused the Earth to warm that much? If they can't prove the latest warm period it's man made, then they can't rule out that the same process isn't happening again.
It's the "man made" part where the evangelical warmists are full of crap.
Last edited by Professor Peabody; 11-04-2012 at 03:18 PM.
Whoever criticizes capitalism, while approving immigration, whose working class is its first victim, had better shut up. Whoever criticizes immigration, while remaining silent about capitalism, should do the same.
~Alain de Benoist
They've actually <progressed>: global warming, global cooling, climate change--just that cigar is a decade behind. And climate change, hell, Hericlitus, around 500bce said "No man ever steps in the same river twice."
(Using blad's sarcasm marks, <>.)
The question is not whether man affects his environment, obviously man does, and no one argues he doesn't, the question is how much, in what way, and what can be done about it.If you doubt GW has been effected by mans activities...
One isn't on the side of science or not, it's not a football game, except maybe to climate change alarmists who try to politicize it.... you are NOT on the side of science.