Originally Posted by Peter1469
If you doubt GW has been effected by mans activities you are NOT on the side of science.
Pretending you are is complete stupidity
Senior Member
If you doubt GW has been effected by mans activities you are NOT on the side of science.
Pretending you are is complete stupidity
Senior Member
A single hurricane in October proves Global Warming?
The first snowfall then disproves it.
Member
Geez she is dumb as a bag of hammers isn't she. Who said the climate wasn't changing? The climate has changed untold numbers of time in the last 4 Billion years. It's the reason that's in dispute.
There were Herbivore Dinosaurs and the vegetation to support them between 400 to 1200 miles from the North Pole about 60 Million years ago. The fossilized remains of both don't lie. Something cause the Earth to warm to that extent, man didn't exist and the fossils for oil were still walking around and growing from the ground. So what caused the Earth to warm that much? If they can't prove the latest warm period it's man made, then they can't rule out that the same process isn't happening again.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/arcticdino/about.html
It's the "man made" part where the evangelical warmists are full of crap.
Last edited by Professor Peabody; 11-04-2012 at 03:18 PM.
Awards:
tPF Moderator
To climate alarmists, the sky is always falling!
Senior Member
It's funny that no matter what actually happens it points to global warming. Unseasonably warm? GW. Unseasonably cold? GW. Seasonal temps? GW. Too much ice? GW. Too little ice? GW. I appreciate that these things can be explained within their interpretative models but there should come a point when it raises a red flag.
Whoever criticizes capitalism, while approving immigration, whose working class is its first victim, had better shut up. Whoever criticizes immigration, while remaining silent about capitalism, should do the same.
~Alain de Benoist
Awards:
tPF Moderator
They've actually <progressed>: global warming, global cooling, climate change--just that cigar is a decade behind. And climate change, hell, Hericlitus, around 500bce said "No man ever steps in the same river twice."
(Using blad's sarcasm marks, <>.)
tPF Moderator
Truthmatters, if I want to discuss intelligence or science, you can be sure to be left out of the discussion.....
Junior Member
That is complete nonsense... You want science, go back and look at the variance in temperatures for millions of years collected from tree rings, ice cores from Greenland and Antarctica, sediments from the bottoms of lakes/oceans, etc. There has been extreme heat as well as extreme cold for roughly 4.5 billion years. There is no such thing as "a norm" to our temperatures and for that fact, for our weather. We are going to have wet yrs, dry yrs, cold yrs, hot yrs. There has been and always will be extreme weather. We can't stop it, change it or alter it. Man made climate change is a complete hoax, just follow the money and it will be clear as day aside from the science...
Peter1469 (11-04-2012)
Awards:
tPF Moderator
The question is not whether man affects his environment, obviously man does, and no one argues he doesn't, the question is how much, in what way, and what can be done about it.If you doubt GW has been effected by mans activities...
One isn't on the side of science or not, it's not a football game, except maybe to climate change alarmists who try to politicize it.... you are NOT on the side of science.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote