User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Plans for the first spaceport are close to finalization

  1. #1
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,691, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497532
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,846
    Points
    863,691
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,691
    Thanked 148,542x in 94,964 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Plans for the first spaceport are close to finalization

    Plans for the first spaceport are close to finalization

    The first step for any serious move into space will be a space port. Craft built off earth can be much larger since they don't have to escape earth's gravity well. There are other advantages as well.

    NASA’s goal of sending humans to Mars by the 2030s faces many challenges. Now, if all goes well, the American space agency is poised to take one of the first steps toward overcoming those challenges. Although the project is still speculative, NASA and other International Space Station (ISS) partners have begun making plans for a cis-lunar “spaceport” designed to provide a stepping-stone to the Red Planet.



    Last month, representatives from five of the world’s space agencies met in Tsukuba, Japan, to discuss their plans for a space station orbiting the Moon. Finalization of the station’s design could come as early as next year. In the ensuing months, these space agencies will begin reviewing plans for a potential cis-lunar station that would serve as proof of concept for many of the challenges that manned missions to asteroids and Mars would pose. Such challenges include the development of deep space life support systems and the integration of human and robotic science and spaceflight operations.



    Cis-lunar space is simply the volume of space enclosed by a sphere with a diameter equivalent to the Moon’s orbit. Proving that closed-system, long-term human habitation is manageable here is a necessity before longer missions are planned at distances that don’t allow for easy rescue or resupply. During the meeting in Tsukuba, the ISS partners agreed upon a Near-Rectilinear Halo Orbit, or NRHO, for the station, which would be an oval-shaped loop that would bring the station as close to the Moon as 900 miles (1,500km) and take it out to 43,000 miles (70,000km) throughout a single orbit.



    There are several advantages of such an orbit, including minimal need for fuel to correct course, consistent communication with Earth and direct sunlight on the station’s solar panels, and ease of access (and egress) for NASA’s Orion spacecraft. Such an orbit is not ideal, however, for exploration of the lunar surface. Russia’s Roscosmos State Corporation for Space Activities, which would prefer the station be used primarily for lunar exploration, is still evaluating the feasibility of a lower lunar orbit, despite the agreement on an initial NRHO.
    Read more at the link.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    Don (03-12-2017),MMC (03-12-2017)

  3. #2
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70170
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,167x in 27,728 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    Plans for the first spaceport are close to finalization

    The first step for any serious move into space will be a space port. Craft built off earth can be much larger since they don't have to escape earth's gravity well. There are other advantages as well.



    Read more at the link.
    Screw the rest of those Space agencies.....lets get our people on it, and lets also get that base on the moon. Forget about sharing anything with any others.
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to MMC For This Useful Post:

    Don (03-12-2017)

  5. #3
    Points: 26,391, Level: 39
    Level completed: 57%, Points required for next Level: 559
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Don's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    29692
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    5,286
    Points
    26,391
    Level
    39
    Thanks Given
    4,185
    Thanked 3,934x in 2,482 Posts
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Screw the rest of those Space agencies.....lets get our people on it, and lets also get that base on the moon. Forget about sharing anything with any others.
    I pretty much agree with that. Up to now most of our partnership is really us "sharing" technology with other countries. The Apollo-Soyuz program in 1975 was pushed as bridging the gap between enemies for peaceful purposes but in reality it was us giving the USSR technology that they could not achieve on their own at that time. The ability to build docking clamps and rings. Sharing things that have potential military purposes. Like Bill Clinton "sharing" guidance technology with China that gave them the ability to MIRV their ICBM's.

    Let our new "skunk works" boys build that spaceship building facility and we can maybe rent part of it to other countries like we rent seats on the Russian capsules at $87 million a seat.
    Last edited by Don; 03-12-2017 at 06:23 PM.


  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Don For This Useful Post:

    MMC (03-13-2017),Peter1469 (03-12-2017)

  7. #4
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70170
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,167x in 27,728 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Don View Post
    I pretty much agree with that. Up to now most of our partnership is really us "sharing" technology with other countries. The Apollo-Soyuz program in 1975 was pushed as bridging the gap between enemies for peaceful purposes but in reality it was us giving the USSR technology that they could not achieve on their own at that time. The ability to build docking clamps and rings. Sharing things that have potential military purposes. Like Bill Clinton "sharing" guidance technology with China that gave them the ability to MIRV their ICBM's.

    Let our new "skunk works" boys build that spaceship building facility and we can maybe rent part of it to other countries like we rent seats on the Russian capsules at $87 million a seat.
    Yep.....we need to end that crap with sharing our Tech. Moreover we need not discuss what we are going to do with those overseas. Lets just do it and leave them behind.
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to MMC For This Useful Post:

    Don (03-13-2017)

  9. #5
    Points: 39,654, Level: 48
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 496
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    VeteranTagger First Class25000 Experience PointsSocial
    waltky's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    5662
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    8,859
    Points
    39,654
    Level
    48
    Thanks Given
    2,515
    Thanked 2,140x in 1,616 Posts
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Red face

    Granny takes possum's toy away from him - when he can't keep up with `em...

    Astronauts lose part of the Space Station after it floats away on spacewalk
    Rob Waugh

    31 March 2017 - Astronauts lost an important piece of cloth shielding for the International Space Station after it floated away while two astronauts were on a spacewalk.
    Astronaut Peggy Whitson radioed in to report that a piece was missing – and NASA is to monitor the cloth bundle to ensure it doesn’t come back and hit the station. The cloth shielding is used to protect the station against micrometeorites from space – and astronauts Whitson and Shane Kimbrough were conducting a spacewalk to install four pieces of it.

    Our beautiful planet Earth in the reflection of my visor during today’s #spacewalk with @AstroPeggy. pic.twitter.com/OZJzz2Ea24 — Shane Kimbrough (@astro_kimbrough) March 30, 2017


    NASA spokesman Dan Huot said that the three remaining shields were installed successfully, and the astronauts installed the cover of the docking port as a makeshift shield. Whitson radioed in, ‘You guys came up with a fantastic plan — on short notice. That’s amazing.’

    The spacewalk was Whitson’s eighth – the most ever performed by a woman, and making her the third-most-experienced spacewalker of all time. Whitson has now logged 59 hours, behind Anatoly Solovyev, who has 68 hours and astronaut Mike Lopez-Alegria, who has 67.

    https://uk.news.yahoo.com/astronauts...080832387.html

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to waltky For This Useful Post:

    MMC (04-01-2017)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts