User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 12 of 12 FirstFirst ... 289101112
Results 111 to 112 of 112

Thread: ​The Meaning Of Marriage

  1. #111
    V.I.P
    Points: 163,472, Level: 96
    Level completed: 46%, Points required for next Level: 2,178
    Overall activity: 58.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocial1 year registered
    FindersKeepers's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    138288
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    7,792
    Points
    163,472
    Level
    96
    Thanks Given
    2,248
    Thanked 5,526x in 3,404 Posts
    Mentioned
    98 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    1391
    Quote Originally Posted by Standing Wolf View Post
    There's a not-so-little problem with that. The status of being married changes literally thousands of things from a legal standpoint - from who is assumed to be the father of a newborn child to who is empowered to pull the plug on a coma patient. The word "married" is almost universally used in those statutes. If you want same-sex couples to "have equal rights under the law", the M word pretty much has to be applied to their unions, or it doesn't happen.
    I agree. It's just a word, yet, in our laws, it affords so much. "Partners" have been kept from visiting their loved ones who were in intensive care. Children brought into these unions were not protected if one parent died intestate.

    My mother got frustrated once over Ellen calling her wife, "wife." My mother thought that if Ellen was calling her the wife, that must mean Ellen was identifying herself as the "husband." I explained that, no, there are "two wives." She thought about that and then brightened. Once she got past the word issue, she seemed more accepting.

    It's just a matter of time.
    I have from an early age abjured the use of meat, and the time will come when men such as I will look upon the murder of animals as they now look upon the murder of men.
    ~Leonardo da Vinci

  2. #112
    V.I.P
    Points: 46,538, Level: 52
    Level completed: 72%, Points required for next Level: 512
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    Tagger First ClassSocial25000 Experience PointsVeteran
    kilgram's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    19311
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    6,154
    Points
    46,538
    Level
    52
    Thanks Given
    1,292
    Thanked 1,260x in 1,032 Posts
    Mentioned
    378 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    203
    Quote Originally Posted by Ethereal View Post
    I said that marriage should be treated like any other contract, so the government would have a role in terms of enforcing and adjudicating those contracts. It should not, however, have the power to define marriage one way or the other. I'm actually making a PRO SS marriage argument if you understand what I'm trying to say.
    I don't know USA, but in Europe marriage is already a kind of contract. With specific terms, but a contract, at all.

    And if someone marries through the Church. They have to sign the agreement. And then this agreement is sent by the Church to the town council where the marriage was done, to validate that marriage.

    It is like any other kind of agreement, for example a rental agreement. Each agreement will have its own specific terms, but all agreements of that type has similar structure, changing some terms. The same happening to marriage agreements, for example.
    Last edited by kilgram; 03-25-2017 at 03:46 PM.
    WORK AND FIGHT FOR THE REVOLUTION AND AGAINST THE INJUSTICE.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Critical Acclaim
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO