User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 62

Thread: Feinstein very concerned.

  1. #31
    Points: 23,829, Level: 37
    Level completed: 57%, Points required for next Level: 521
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesYour first Group50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    AeonPax's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    133449
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    4,766
    Points
    23,829
    Level
    37
    Thanks Given
    1,500
    Thanked 3,101x in 1,897 Posts
    Mentioned
    59 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Subdermal View Post
    The point of @patrickt's post isn't to quibble on the context of Obama's statement. It is to illustrate the silliness of the leftist meme - the commonly accepted and believed leftist meme - that Bush uttered something, and Obama did not. Obviously, the opposite is true. Regardless of context.
    `
    That's one way to look at it, but I just don't agree. I'll leave it at that.
    `

  2. #32
    Points: 79,997, Level: 68
    Level completed: 98%, Points required for next Level: 53
    Overall activity: 0.3%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    nathanbforrest45's Avatar Banned
    Karma
    77960
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    In a house on a hill
    Posts
    28,260
    Points
    79,997
    Level
    68
    Thanks Given
    7,102
    Thanked 16,261x in 10,568 Posts
    Mentioned
    129 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Strangelove View Post
    WRONG! Its was GW Bush who said its just a goddam piece of paper! Obama never said that!


    Once again the left proves themselves to be idiots.

    http://www.factcheck.org/2007/12/bus...iece-of-paper/

  3. #33
    Original Ranter
    Points: 314,886, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second Class50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteranYour first Group
    Captain Obvious's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    773942
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    80,473
    Points
    314,886
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    30,199
    Thanked 40,087x in 27,208 Posts
    Mentioned
    1041 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Feinstein wanted someone who hates our (becoming great again) nation and who hates the constitution.

  4. #34
    Points: 30,469, Level: 42
    Level completed: 59%, Points required for next Level: 581
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsTagger Second ClassVeteran
    decedent's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    390557
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    7,037
    Points
    30,469
    Level
    42
    Thanks Given
    2,238
    Thanked 2,794x in 2,008 Posts
    Mentioned
    123 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cletus View Post
    You don't even know what Citizens United affirmed, do you?

    Scalia had 30 years on the Supreme Court and all you can do is focus on one case you don't even understand.
    Like I said, that decision gave rights to corporations because people had the same rights. Granting the right of free speech to corporations dilutes that right for citizens. Corporations aren't citizens any more than undocumented immigrants are citizens.


    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    That is a silly distortion of what originalism is.

    Feel free to educate us. It's only fair to warn you that it may surpass your one-sentence reply limit.
    I have a big cook.

  5. #35
    Points: 431,936, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdriveSocial
    Awards:
    Frequent Poster
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    307943
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton, Washington
    Posts
    183,353
    Points
    431,936
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    20,172
    Thanked 76,958x in 55,587 Posts
    Mentioned
    700 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Hard core liberals go into panic mode when they are confronted with the reality of a genuine constitutionalist being selected for the Supreme Court. They are even more panicked when that Justice says that their job is to interpret law, not write law.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Tahuyaman For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (03-21-2017)

  7. #36
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70166
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,163x in 27,727 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Senator Feinstein Embarrasses Herself By Accusing Gorsuch of Not Fighting For The Little Guy.....



    Democrat Senator and Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee Dianne Feinstein attempted to corner Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch as a corporate sympathizer Tuesday during his confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill. It did not go well for her as Gorsuch politely shot back with a list of cases in which he fought for the "little guy" throughout his career.





    Shoshana Weissmann
    @senatorshoshana Oh FFS @SenFeinstein the whole point is that Gorsuch isn't "for" anyone - not the corporations nor little guy. He's "for" the Constitution
    9:34 AM - 21 Mar 2017 .....snip~

    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiep...e-guy-n2302064


    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

  8. #37
    Points: 431,936, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdriveSocial
    Awards:
    Frequent Poster
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    307943
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton, Washington
    Posts
    183,353
    Points
    431,936
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    20,172
    Thanked 76,958x in 55,587 Posts
    Mentioned
    700 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    When one is on the Senate Judiciary Committee and one is questioning a quality nominee for the Supreme Court, it will be obvious quite quickly if the questioner is either a partisan hack, ignorant or both.

  9. #38
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70166
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,163x in 27,727 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Looks like Durbin fills both. The Demos just made themselves look like fools. They wont be able to stop Gorsuch after their stunts today.



    This may not be quite as satisfying as Gorsuch's response to Sen. Feinstein's "why don't you ever side with the little guy?" flop, but it's pretty close. When Illinois Democrat Dick Durbin raised this exceedingly weak criticism of Gorsuch -- which was leveled by a former student who also just so happens to be a former professional Democrat (a relevant fact omitted by New York Magazine and NPR) -- the Supreme Court nominee was ready. Rather than alluding to the accuser's partisanship or objecting to the distortion, he calmly explained the context of the supposedly 'problematic' discussion at issue. He happily accepted Durbin's nothing-burger and feasted, seizing the non-controversy to present himself as a defender of women in the workplace. Impressive:




    Gorsuch is putting on a clinic, and the Trump administration's team is thus far offering an exquisitely-executed textbook lesson in how to get somebody confirmed. The media's verdict on the performance is virtually unanimous, even on MSNBC and CNN:


    John Harwood
    @JohnJHarwood there is no chance under the sun that Democrats defeat Gorsuch nomination. he makes extremely strong case for himself
    9:37 AM - 21 Mar 2017 .....snip~


    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guyben...es-it-n2302162
    Last edited by MMC; 03-21-2017 at 05:39 PM.
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

  10. #39
    Points: 56,719, Level: 58
    Level completed: 19%, Points required for next Level: 1,631
    Overall activity: 0.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsTagger Second Class
    patrickt's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    17597
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Living in Oaxaca, Mexico, born in Memphis and worked in Colorado
    Posts
    11,977
    Points
    56,719
    Level
    58
    Thanks Given
    916
    Thanked 5,009x in 3,481 Posts
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Senator Feinstein Embarrasses Herself By Accusing Gorsuch of Not Fighting For The Little Guy.....



    Democrat Senator and Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee Dianne Feinstein attempted to corner Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch as a corporate sympathizer Tuesday during his confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill. It did not go well for her as Gorsuch politely shot back with a list of cases in which he fought for the "little guy" throughout his career.





    Shoshana Weissmann
    @senatorshoshana Oh FFS @SenFeinstein the whole point is that Gorsuch isn't "for" anyone - not the corporations nor little guy. He's "for" the Constitution
    9:34 AM - 21 Mar 2017 .....snip~

    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiep...e-guy-n2302064


    Embarrassment requires a sense of shame which requires a sense of responsibility. Democrats have no sense of responsibility and therefore never feel shame or embarrassment so Sen. Feinstein is immune.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to patrickt For This Useful Post:

    MMC (03-22-2017)

  12. #40
    Points: 431,936, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdriveSocial
    Awards:
    Frequent Poster
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    307943
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton, Washington
    Posts
    183,353
    Points
    431,936
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    20,172
    Thanked 76,958x in 55,587 Posts
    Mentioned
    700 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Everyone who questioned his qualifications or fitness for the position looked like a fool. They have no choice now but to vote for his confirmation. They will expose themselves as simply partisan hacks if they don't.

    Feinstein looked like the proverbial deer in the headlights. Durban just got punked, but respectfully punked.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts