I've almost come to the end of the points I wanted to make.
THIS IS A CONTINUATION OF THE REAL DISCUSSION. SEE POSTS 1, 9, 14, 38, 40, 43, 49, 50 and 78 and 84, 88, 91, and 92
The anti-immigrant lobby said undocumented foreigners were a drain on the American public. Then 500 economists disagreed. The anti-immigrant lobby said undocumented foreigners don't pay taxes, and the Chief Actuary for the Social Security Administration disagreed with them.
So, as a consolation prize, the anti-immigrant lobby wants the undocumented to be criminals... as if spending tax dollars to stroke their ego will make the issue better. It does not.
EVERYTHING the anti-immigrant lobby has put forth calls for a bigger and more intrusive government. They have spent TRILLIONS of dollars and jeopardized many of your constitutional Liberties. Yet, by their own words, the perceived problem is as bad today as it was over a decade and half ago when they garnered front page news headlines. It's time to offer up better ideas.
Despite all their criticisms, not one time has even ONE of those being critical of me answered any of the many questions I've put on the table. I've been more than diligent in responding to them. IF, at the end of the day, the anti-immigrant lobby sticks to the theme that “they (sic) don't belong here” and the anti- immigrant lobby does not support immigration reform, then they owe you honest answers.
Explain how you can not be anti – immigrant and support laws that discriminate against whites. Explain how calling people criminals is a good thing when it's counterproductive to your cause. If you still hold the same view, would you support returning to the first statute the U.S. had regarding immigration... it was limited to whites?
In the course of my relevant posts we have witnessed the anti-immigrant lobby dodging, ducking, and deflecting. They have treated me with disrespect and disdain and tried to talk down to me. One poster even claimed he got information from an attorney, but refuses to tell the name of the attorney - Meanwhile I have cited the U.S. Attorney's Criminal Resource Manual as proof that improper entry (in and of itself) is a civil violation of the law. Still, at the end of the day, the anti-immigrant lobby doesn't have a case so they ignored my previous posts and questions.
If these people are that stubborn and that petty - If they don't care about the long term ramifications of their actions any more than they exhibited here, you have to ask yourself if they are qualified to lead a nation on this issue. I think not. They do want me to address yet another pretext - and I will. Then I can give you the real solutions and we can call it a wrap - if you like.