Don Lemon And CNN Panel Lose It

[Safety]

`
Comparing Trump and Martin Luther King is a dichotomy.

But to speak on that difference is evidently taboo.

[DGUtley]

Again, yes, there are people who react with emotion rather than reason.

Again, could you address the topic?

So, answering your post is now off-topic? Is this supposed to be a monologue?



Ok.

Notice

Notice @Safety TB for trolling

If you have questions or concerns about this moderation action, please use the Report button to let us know.

[Chris]

Great, so if I said Trump is the Huey Long of 21st century American politics because they have used many of the same tactics, I'm sure no one should object.

As I said earlier I'm sure there are many who would do what you did, read more into it than intended and be offended.

[Chris]

Of course not, but suggesting that someone does not identify with the sensibilities of those who see a situation differently is an accusation of some kind of disorder, rather than just a statement of fact based on the argument being made. Also, apparently suggesting someone is irrational because they disagree and recognize someone like MLK's historical impact and can understand how drawing certain comparisons could be offensive to many, is also not an ad hom. Shrug.

Rambling is a description of prose, prose that rambled on with a strawman.

Telling people who disagree with you that there's something wrong with them is ad hom and fallaciious.

Irrational is a description of an argument based on emotion.

Distinguish between post and poster.

This topic has nothing to do with MLK's impact. I suggest, since it's On the Serious Side, you stick to and contribute to the topic.

[Chris]

`
Comparing Trump and Martin Luther King is a dichotomy.

Right, what's has been done by Lemon and panel is to lose it and argue a strawman false dichotomy.