User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: The Origins of State and Government

  1. #1
    Points: 192,240, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 70.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive1 year registered50000 Experience PointsTagger First Class
    Awards:
    Frequent Poster
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    28431
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    56,139
    Points
    192,240
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    4,138
    Thanked 10,450x in 8,183 Posts
    Mentioned
    583 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    343

    The Origins of State and Government

    From The Origins of State and Government (.PDF):

    It cannot be the case that
    all wealth is attributable to
    the state. Historically, the
    existence of a state required
    a surplus to sustain it in
    the first place.
    State formation represents
    a transformation
    from ‘roving bandits’ to
    ‘stationary bandits.’ The
    state is, at its core, a predatory
    institution.
    When meditating on
    what it means to live as
    free people we should
    never forget that the state
    doesn’t grant to us our
    identities or our rights.
    Property rights precedes the marketplace and that precedes the state

  2. #2
    Points: 65,287, Level: 62
    Level completed: 40%, Points required for next Level: 1,263
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupCreated Album picturesTagger First Class1 year registered50000 Experience Points
    KC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    20926
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Wisconsin, USA
    Posts
    8,880
    Points
    65,287
    Level
    62
    Thanks Given
    4,290
    Thanked 4,032x in 2,808 Posts
    Mentioned
    270 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    220
    Is there an internal contradiction in the way we see the state, Chris?

    I agree that private property precedes the state. That much is clear. I also think that property is among Man's natural rights. We think the state should protect our natural rights, but in order for it to do that it must necessarily confiscate some of our property.

    So, at some point we are giving up some of our property, one of our natural rights, precisely so the state will protect our natural rights.

  3. #3
    Points: 192,240, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 70.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive1 year registered50000 Experience PointsTagger First Class
    Awards:
    Frequent Poster
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    28431
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    56,139
    Points
    192,240
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    4,138
    Thanked 10,450x in 8,183 Posts
    Mentioned
    583 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    343
    Well, seems to me, the state goes well beyond mere protection of property and natural rights in social contracts like the US Constitution when it appropriates wealth for other purposes. Therein it become legalized theft.

  4. #4
    Points: 65,287, Level: 62
    Level completed: 40%, Points required for next Level: 1,263
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupCreated Album picturesTagger First Class1 year registered50000 Experience Points
    KC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    20926
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Wisconsin, USA
    Posts
    8,880
    Points
    65,287
    Level
    62
    Thanks Given
    4,290
    Thanked 4,032x in 2,808 Posts
    Mentioned
    270 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    220
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    Well, seems to me, the state goes well beyond mere protection of property and natural rights in social contracts like the US Constitution when it appropriates wealth for other purposes. Therein it become legalized theft.
    Wait, so, to be clear, you're saying that unless that property is confiscated in order to protect our natural rights, it's theft?

  5. #5
    Points: 192,240, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 70.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive1 year registered50000 Experience PointsTagger First Class
    Awards:
    Frequent Poster
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    28431
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    56,139
    Points
    192,240
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    4,138
    Thanked 10,450x in 8,183 Posts
    Mentioned
    583 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    343
    Quote Originally Posted by kathaariancode View Post
    Wait, so, to be clear, you're saying that unless that property is confiscated in order to protect our natural rights, it's theft?
    By social contract, the Constitution, even if only implied, we agree to give up certain powers to government. By that agreement, those powers do not entail theft. But anything beyond that is theft. Looking at it practically.

    Theoretically, everything government appropriates is theft. That video I posted recently, http://thepoliticalforums.com/thread...oss-of-Liberty, Judge Napolitano would agree, so would Lysander Spooner.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Chris For This Useful Post:

    KC (11-06-2012)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Forum Topsite Critical Acclaim
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO