User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 32

Thread: Judge Dismisses Clock Boy Suit

  1. #11
    Points: 4,260, Level: 15
    Level completed: 43%, Points required for next Level: 290
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience PointsTagger Second ClassSocial
    HawkTheSlayer's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    658
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    563
    Points
    4,260
    Level
    15
    Thanks Given
    1,203
    Thanked 648x in 344 Posts
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to HawkTheSlayer For This Useful Post:

    Captain Obvious (05-19-2017)

  3. #12
    Points: 88,609, Level: 72
    Level completed: 55%, Points required for next Level: 1,141
    Overall activity: 37.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsTagger Second ClassVeteran
    Safety's Avatar Nationalist
    Karma
    2611200
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    GA/FL
    Posts
    38,594
    Points
    88,609
    Level
    72
    Thanks Given
    18,421
    Thanked 17,680x in 11,904 Posts
    Mentioned
    854 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by exotix View Post
    They said the same thing about the Trayvon and Zimmerman case, even though he was on record as highlighting his race as the reason he was suspicious. So, one has to wonder the objectivity of what constitutes a "reasonable mind".

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Safety For This Useful Post:

    exotix (05-19-2017)

  5. #13
    Points: 226,218, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.5%
    Achievements:
    Overdrive50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    exotix's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    536266
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Starz Fall on Alabama !
    Posts
    40,135
    Points
    226,218
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    5,695
    Thanked 7,178x in 5,832 Posts
    Mentioned
    810 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Safety View Post
    They said the same thing about the Trayvon and Zimmerman case, even though he was on record as highlighting his race as the reason he was suspicious.


    So, one has to wonder the objectivity of what constitutes a "reasonable mind".
    Let's get the the OP to clarify ... I notice he posted no precedence of what *constitutes a reasonable mind*
    'How and Why ?' ~ Einstein

  6. #14
    Original Ranter
    Points: 249,451, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.6%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second Class50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteranYour first Group
    Captain Obvious's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    768555
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    72,188
    Points
    249,451
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    25,256
    Thanked 34,695x in 23,558 Posts
    Mentioned
    926 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    I bet this kid winds up blowing up a coffee shop somewhere

  7. #15
    Points: 226,218, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.5%
    Achievements:
    Overdrive50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    exotix's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    536266
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Starz Fall on Alabama !
    Posts
    40,135
    Points
    226,218
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    5,695
    Thanked 7,178x in 5,832 Posts
    Mentioned
    810 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Captain Obvious View Post
    I bet this kid winds up blowing up a coffee shop somewhere
    Obviously he was playing out an ISIS operation.
    'How and Why ?' ~ Einstein

  8. #16
    Points: 16,392, Level: 30
    Level completed: 95%, Points required for next Level: 58
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Newpublius's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    38042
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Riverdale, NJ
    Posts
    5,956
    Points
    16,392
    Level
    30
    Thanks Given
    1,249
    Thanked 3,025x in 2,077 Posts
    Mentioned
    93 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by exotix View Post
    Yes, indeed, if there is a dispute of fact, the jidge, for purposes of a motion to dismiss or a summary judgment motion must look at the fact as those most favorable to the non-moving party.

  9. #17
    Points: 226,218, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.5%
    Achievements:
    Overdrive50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    exotix's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    536266
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Starz Fall on Alabama !
    Posts
    40,135
    Points
    226,218
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    5,695
    Thanked 7,178x in 5,832 Posts
    Mentioned
    810 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Newpublius View Post
    Yes, indeed, if there is a dispute of fact, the jidge, for purposes of a motion to dismiss or a summary judgment motion must look at the fact as those most favorable to the non-moving party.
    Proving once again that we are nation of laws ... not men.
    'How and Why ?' ~ Einstein

  10. #18
    Points: 88,609, Level: 72
    Level completed: 55%, Points required for next Level: 1,141
    Overall activity: 37.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsTagger Second ClassVeteran
    Safety's Avatar Nationalist
    Karma
    2611200
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    GA/FL
    Posts
    38,594
    Points
    88,609
    Level
    72
    Thanks Given
    18,421
    Thanked 17,680x in 11,904 Posts
    Mentioned
    854 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by exotix View Post
    Proving once again that we are nation of laws ... not men.
    Ooops.

  11. #19
    Points: 72,127, Level: 65
    Level completed: 54%, Points required for next Level: 1,023
    Overall activity: 83.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsTagger Second ClassSocialVeteran
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    278854
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Madison
    Posts
    36,330
    Points
    72,127
    Level
    65
    Thanks Given
    26,469
    Thanked 10,213x in 8,041 Posts
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Safety View Post
    They said the same thing about the Trayvon and Zimmerman case, even though he was on record as highlighting his race as the reason he was suspicious. So, one has to wonder the objectivity of what constitutes a "reasonable mind".
    After all this time you still don't know that was a lie. Fascinating.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.

  12. #20

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 28,726, Level: 41
    Level completed: 34%, Points required for next Level: 924
    Overall activity: 21.0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassSocial50000 Experience PointsTagger First Class1 year registered
    DGUtley's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    161535
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    8,578
    Points
    28,726
    Level
    41
    Thanks Given
    3,486
    Thanked 6,797x in 3,971 Posts
    Mentioned
    319 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Safety View Post
    They said the same thing about the Trayvon and Zimmerman case, even though he was on record as highlighting his race as the reason he was suspicious. So, one has to wonder the objectivity of what constitutes a "reasonable mind".
    Quote Originally Posted by exotix View Post
    Let's get the the OP to clarify ... I notice he posted no precedence of what *constitutes a reasonable mind*
    Boy that takes me all the way back to 1984, first year law school. Without doing research, it means there has to be some evidence to support the contention -- not innuendo, or argument, or supposition -- but evidence. At the summary judgment standard, the party has to put up some evidence. To get summary judgment (to toss someone's case at an early stage) is very very difficult. The bar is not very high for the responding party to get over. But, you cannot respond with argument -- you have to put up evidence, or at least evidence to raise an argument. Judges just do not toss cases willy nilly. It's not done. Every benefit is given to the suing party -- the clock boy in this instance. 99% of what I do is civil defense -- representing those evil insurance companies -- and it is very difficult to get a case tossed, particularly by a federal judge.
    Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes​

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to DGUtley For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (05-19-2017)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Critical Acclaim
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO