User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 32

Thread: Judge Dismisses Clock Boy Suit

  1. #11
    Points: 3,190, Level: 13
    Level completed: 28%, Points required for next Level: 360
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience PointsTagger Second ClassSocial
    HawkTheSlayer's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    364
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    346
    Points
    3,190
    Level
    13
    Thanks Given
    605
    Thanked 354x in 203 Posts
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to HawkTheSlayer For This Useful Post:

    Captain Obvious (05-19-2017)

  3. #12
    Points: 83,613, Level: 70
    Level completed: 49%, Points required for next Level: 1,237
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsTagger Second ClassVeteran
    Safety's Avatar Nationalist
    Karma
    2609894
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    GA/FL
    Posts
    36,020
    Points
    83,613
    Level
    70
    Thanks Given
    17,086
    Thanked 16,374x in 10,990 Posts
    Mentioned
    783 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by exotix View Post
    They said the same thing about the Trayvon and Zimmerman case, even though he was on record as highlighting his race as the reason he was suspicious. So, one has to wonder the objectivity of what constitutes a "reasonable mind".

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Safety For This Useful Post:

    exotix (05-19-2017)

  5. #13
    Points: 211,150, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Overdrive50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    exotix's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    535853
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Starz Fall on Alabama !
    Posts
    38,062
    Points
    211,150
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    5,322
    Thanked 6,765x in 5,498 Posts
    Mentioned
    792 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Safety View Post
    They said the same thing about the Trayvon and Zimmerman case, even though he was on record as highlighting his race as the reason he was suspicious.


    So, one has to wonder the objectivity of what constitutes a "reasonable mind".
    Let's get the the OP to clarify ... I notice he posted no precedence of what *constitutes a reasonable mind*
    'How and Why ?' ~ Einstein

  6. #14
    Original Ranter
    Points: 246,235, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.6%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second Class50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteranYour first Group
    Captain Obvious's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    768092
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    71,468
    Points
    246,235
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    24,978
    Thanked 34,232x in 23,270 Posts
    Mentioned
    915 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    I bet this kid winds up blowing up a coffee shop somewhere

  7. #15
    Points: 211,150, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Overdrive50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    exotix's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    535853
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Starz Fall on Alabama !
    Posts
    38,062
    Points
    211,150
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    5,322
    Thanked 6,765x in 5,498 Posts
    Mentioned
    792 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Captain Obvious View Post
    I bet this kid winds up blowing up a coffee shop somewhere
    Obviously he was playing out an ISIS operation.
    'How and Why ?' ~ Einstein

  8. #16
    Points: 15,882, Level: 30
    Level completed: 44%, Points required for next Level: 568
    Overall activity: 12.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Newpublius's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    37974
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Riverdale, NJ
    Posts
    5,808
    Points
    15,882
    Level
    30
    Thanks Given
    1,206
    Thanked 2,957x in 2,033 Posts
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by exotix View Post
    Yes, indeed, if there is a dispute of fact, the jidge, for purposes of a motion to dismiss or a summary judgment motion must look at the fact as those most favorable to the non-moving party.

  9. #17
    Points: 211,150, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Overdrive50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    exotix's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    535853
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Starz Fall on Alabama !
    Posts
    38,062
    Points
    211,150
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    5,322
    Thanked 6,765x in 5,498 Posts
    Mentioned
    792 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Newpublius View Post
    Yes, indeed, if there is a dispute of fact, the jidge, for purposes of a motion to dismiss or a summary judgment motion must look at the fact as those most favorable to the non-moving party.
    Proving once again that we are nation of laws ... not men.
    'How and Why ?' ~ Einstein

  10. #18
    Points: 83,613, Level: 70
    Level completed: 49%, Points required for next Level: 1,237
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsTagger Second ClassVeteran
    Safety's Avatar Nationalist
    Karma
    2609894
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    GA/FL
    Posts
    36,020
    Points
    83,613
    Level
    70
    Thanks Given
    17,086
    Thanked 16,374x in 10,990 Posts
    Mentioned
    783 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by exotix View Post
    Proving once again that we are nation of laws ... not men.
    Ooops.

  11. #19
    Points: 65,768, Level: 62
    Level completed: 63%, Points required for next Level: 782
    Overall activity: 47.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsTagger Second ClassSocialVeteran
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    277351
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Madison
    Posts
    32,812
    Points
    65,768
    Level
    62
    Thanks Given
    22,644
    Thanked 8,710x in 6,931 Posts
    Mentioned
    144 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Safety View Post
    They said the same thing about the Trayvon and Zimmerman case, even though he was on record as highlighting his race as the reason he was suspicious. So, one has to wonder the objectivity of what constitutes a "reasonable mind".
    After all this time you still don't know that was a lie. Fascinating.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.

  12. #20

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 23,790, Level: 37
    Level completed: 54%, Points required for next Level: 560
    Overall activity: 35.0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassSocial50000 Experience PointsTagger First Class1 year registered
    DGUtley's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    160408
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    7,166
    Points
    23,790
    Level
    37
    Thanks Given
    3,053
    Thanked 5,670x in 3,318 Posts
    Mentioned
    256 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Safety View Post
    They said the same thing about the Trayvon and Zimmerman case, even though he was on record as highlighting his race as the reason he was suspicious. So, one has to wonder the objectivity of what constitutes a "reasonable mind".
    Quote Originally Posted by exotix View Post
    Let's get the the OP to clarify ... I notice he posted no precedence of what *constitutes a reasonable mind*
    Boy that takes me all the way back to 1984, first year law school. Without doing research, it means there has to be some evidence to support the contention -- not innuendo, or argument, or supposition -- but evidence. At the summary judgment standard, the party has to put up some evidence. To get summary judgment (to toss someone's case at an early stage) is very very difficult. The bar is not very high for the responding party to get over. But, you cannot respond with argument -- you have to put up evidence, or at least evidence to raise an argument. Judges just do not toss cases willy nilly. It's not done. Every benefit is given to the suing party -- the clock boy in this instance. 99% of what I do is civil defense -- representing those evil insurance companies -- and it is very difficult to get a case tossed, particularly by a federal judge.
    Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes​

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to DGUtley For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (05-19-2017)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Critical Acclaim
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO