Media’s Trump Coverage Negative on Every Outlet, Every Issue

[Common]

Media’s Trump Coverage Negative on Every Outlet, Every Issue

Considering that trump has been under seige since the minute Hllary conceded by the disgusting liberal press. Hes a success because of what hes accomplished anyway.



Trump’s coverage during his first 100 days set a new standard for negativity,” a new Harvard study concludes.“Of news reports with a clear tone, negative reports outpaced positive ones by 80 percent to 20 percent,” finds the report from Harvard University analyzing news coverage of President Trump’s first 100 days in office.
Media coverage of President Barack Obama’s first 100 days was positive 59% of the time, three times more often than Trump’s 20% positive coverage.
Negativity towards Trump was ubiquitous, the study finds:
“Trump’s coverage during his first 100 days was not merely negative in overall terms. It was unfavorable on every dimension. There was not a single major topic where Trump’s coverage was more positive than negative.”
Every media outlet studied provided more negative than positive coverage of Trump, ranging from a high of 93% negative at CNN and NBC to a low of 52% negative at Fox:

• CNN: 93% Negative,
• NBC: 93% Negative,
• CBS: 91% Negative,
• New York Times: 87% Negative,
• Washington Post: 83% Negative,
• Wall Street Journal: 70% Negative
• Fox: 52% Negative

Likewise, media coverage was negative about Trump regarding every major issue studied. Media were most disparaging of Trump regarding immigration (96% negative), followed by their 87% negative coverage regarding both health care and Russia’s role in the 2016 elections.
Media were most balanced covering Trump regarding economic matters, with 54% negative stories and 46% positive stories:

• Immigration: 96% Negative,
• Heath care: 87% Negative,
• Russia and the Election: 87% Negative,
• International Trade: 84%
• Personal Background: 82%
• Other Foreign/Defense: 82% Negative,
• Personnel: 82% Negative,
• Fitness for Office: 81% Negative,
• Terrorist Threat: 70% Negative,
• Other Domestic: 72% Negative,
• Economy: 54% Negative,
• All Other Topics: 82% Negative

http://www.cnsnews.com/blog/craig-ba...et-every-issue

[Bethere]

Media’s Trump Coverage Negative on Every Outlet, Every Issue

Considering that trump has been under seige since the minute Hllary conceded by the disgusting liberal press. Hes a success because of what hes accomplished anyway.





Trump’s coverage during his first 100 days set a new standard for negativity,” a new Harvard study concludes.“Of news reports with a clear tone, negative reports outpaced positive ones by 80 percent to 20 percent,” finds the report from Harvard University analyzing news coverage of President Trump’s first 100 days in office.
Media coverage of President Barack Obama’s first 100 days was positive 59% of the time, three times more often than Trump’s 20% positive coverage.
Negativity towards Trump was ubiquitous, the study finds:
“Trump’s coverage during his first 100 days was not merely negative in overall terms. It was unfavorable on every dimension. There was not a single major topic where Trump’s coverage was more positive than negative.”
Every media outlet studied provided more negative than positive coverage of Trump, ranging from a high of 93% negative at CNN and NBC to a low of 52% negative at Fox:

• CNN: 93% Negative,
• NBC: 93% Negative,
• CBS: 91% Negative,
• New York Times: 87% Negative,
• Washington Post: 83% Negative,
• Wall Street Journal: 70% Negative
• Fox: 52% Negative

Likewise, media coverage was negative about Trump regarding every major issue studied. Media were most disparaging of Trump regarding immigration (96% negative), followed by their 87% negative coverage regarding both health care and Russia’s role in the 2016 elections.
Media were most balanced covering Trump regarding economic matters, with 54% negative stories and 46% positive stories:

• Immigration: 96% Negative,
• Heath care: 87% Negative,
• Russia and the Election: 87% Negative,
• International Trade: 84%
• Personal Background: 82%
• Other Foreign/Defense: 82% Negative,
• Personnel: 82% Negative,
• Fitness for Office: 81% Negative,
• Terrorist Threat: 70% Negative,
• Other Domestic: 72% Negative,
• Economy: 54% Negative,
• All Other Topics: 82% Negative

http://www.cnsnews.com/blog/craig-ba...et-every-issue

Just because the coverage is negative doesn't mean that it isn't true, nor does it mean that it is biased.

[Common]

Just because the coverage is negative doesn't mean that it isn't true, nor does it mean that it is biased.

Doesnt mean its definitely not true, I agree with that, but most if it is pure made up contrived embellished on bull$#@!. Its a set up, you on the left cant deny that the entire media is a left wing outlet carrying liberal water and have been for DECADES. Now heres some food for thought, even with a very liberal media who will not report negatives on democrats or liberals, still you lost the whitehouse the congress most govnorships and statehouses. Whats that tell you ?

[Common]

Just because the coverage is negative doesn't mean that it isn't true, nor does it mean that it is biased.

Doesnt mean its definitely not true, I agree with that, but most if it is pure made up contrived embellished on bull$#@!. Its a set up, you on the left cant deny that the entire media is a left wing outlet carrying liberal water and have been for DECADES. Now heres some food for thought, even with a very liberal media who will not report negatives on democrats or liberals, still you lost the whitehouse the congress most govnorships and statehouses. Whats that tell you ?

Oh and just because you want to believe it, doesnt make it true

[Bethere]

Doesnt mean its definitely not true, I agree with that, but most if it is pure made up contrived embellished on bull$#@!. Its a set up, you on the left cant deny that the entire media is a left wing outlet carrying liberal water and have been for DECADES. Now heres some food for thought, even with a very liberal media who will not report negatives on democrats or liberals, still you lost the whitehouse the congress most govnorships and statehouses. Whats that tell you ?

Oh and just because you want to believe it, doesnt make it true

Just because you don't want to believe it, doesn't make it false.

[Crepitus]

The coverage is overwhelmingly negative I agree. However that isn't because of media bias. It's because that's what trump gives them to publish. There is not one single issue he hasn't waffled or flip flopped on. He has said virtually nothing positive about anyone, every third word out of his mouth (or twitter account) is a provable lie.

There is nothing positive to report.

[Safety]

Just because you don't want to believe it, doesn't make it false.

Belief Perseverance. It's real and dangerous.

[resister]

If trump cured world hunger the media would blame him for a world obesity epidemic!

[Crepitus]

If trump cured world hunger the media would blame him for a world obesity epidemic!

Trump hasn't done a single positive thing, what makes you think he could do something so monumental with a record like his?

[Bethere]

Belief Perseverance. It's real and dangerous.

Have you ever read 'future shock?'