User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 39

Thread: Is it time to drop the Electoral College?

  1. #21
    tPF Moderator
    V.I.P
    Points: 224,018, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Chris's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    41599
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    62,344
    Points
    224,018
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    4,720
    Thanked 12,531x in 9,699 Posts
    Mentioned
    738 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    481
    Quote Originally Posted by Captain Obvious View Post
    Except for a few instances, you do realize that for the most part that concept is superfluous, no?

    90-some percent of the time the popular vote goes with the electoral vote. It came close this election, but that correlation still maintained.

    Having said that, I still don't understand the concept of the facade of "states rights" when at the end of the day votes are paralleling electoral votes. Stating it the other way, I don't see a benefit of having an electoral college - what does it protect elections from (or defend them from)?
    But it could. I think Bush v Gore was last example....yes:

    Nominee George W. Bush Al Gore
    Party Republican Democratic
    Home state Texas Tennessee
    Running mate Dick Cheney Joe Lieberman
    Electoral vote 271 266
    States carried 30 20 + DC
    Popular vote 50,456,002 50,999,897
    Percentage 47.9% 48.4%

    @http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2000

  2. #22
    Original Ranter
    Points: 260,924, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 85.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second Class50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteran
    Awards:
    Community Award
    Captain Obvious's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    117923
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    40,412
    Points
    260,924
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    12,802
    Thanked 15,359x in 10,977 Posts
    Mentioned
    563 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    1223
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    But it could. I think Bush v Gore was last example....yes:

    Nominee George W. Bush Al Gore
    Party Republican Democratic
    Home state Texas Tennessee
    Running mate Dick Cheney Joe Lieberman
    Electoral vote 271 266
    States carried 30 20 + DC
    Popular vote 50,456,002 50,999,897
    Percentage 47.9% 48.4%

    @http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2000
    Could what?

    Aside from (assuming your conservatism) your candidate being elected, what did the electoral college accomplish in GvB?


  3. #23
    tPF Moderator
    V.I.P
    Points: 224,018, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Chris's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    41599
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    62,344
    Points
    224,018
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    4,720
    Thanked 12,531x in 9,699 Posts
    Mentioned
    738 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    481
    Quote Originally Posted by Captain Obvious View Post
    Could what?

    Aside from (assuming your conservatism) your candidate being elected, what did the electoral college accomplish in GvB?
    Could have resulted in Gore being Prez, imagine where that would have led us! But the elctoral college, and the court, got Bush elected.


    I'm not arguing it would be a major step away from state's rights, just another step along the way of eroding those rights.

  4. #24
    Original Ranter
    Points: 260,924, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 85.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second Class50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteran
    Awards:
    Community Award
    Captain Obvious's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    117923
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    40,412
    Points
    260,924
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    12,802
    Thanked 15,359x in 10,977 Posts
    Mentioned
    563 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    1223
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    Could have resulted in Gore being Prez, imagine where that would have led us! But the elctoral college, and the court, got Bush elected.


    I'm not arguing it would be a major step away from state's rights, just another step along the way of eroding those rights.
    You didn't answer the question though, taking your party favorite win out of the equation, what did the electoral college accomplish?

    How did the electoral college system work that prevented a popularly voted president from losing the election?

    Ignore who the actual candidates are, unless you're suggesting that the system is a stop-gap from having liberal POTUS candidates elected.


  5. #25
    tPF Moderator
    V.I.P
    Points: 224,018, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Chris's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    41599
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    62,344
    Points
    224,018
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    4,720
    Thanked 12,531x in 9,699 Posts
    Mentioned
    738 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    481
    Quote Originally Posted by Captain Obvious View Post
    You didn't answer the question though, taking your party favorite win out of the equation, what did the electoral college accomplish?

    How did the electoral college system work that prevented a popularly voted president from losing the election?

    Ignore who the actual candidates are, unless you're suggesting that the system is a stop-gap from having liberal POTUS candidates elected.
    Thought I did, the electoral college give states a modicum of power over a populist, nationalist vote.

    I don't see it as political one way or another. According to this, Electoral College vs. popular vote splits, it has favored Reps over Dems:
    1876: Republican Rutherford Hayes defeats Samuel Tilden by 185 to 184 in Electoral College despite a 254,235-popular-vote deficit.
    1888: Republican Benjamin Harrison defeats Democrat Grover Cleveland by 233 to 168 in Electoral College despite 90,596-popular-vote deficit.
    2000: Republican George W. Bush defeats Democrat Al Gore by 277 to 266 in Electoral College despite 543,895-popular-vote deficit.
    Remember, I'm the guy sees no difference between the duopolistic parties.

    To me it's simply a matter of where power resides, in the states, a federalist system, as it was designed, or the central government, a federal system, which changing it from electoral to popular wound nudge us toward.

  6. #26
    Original Ranter
    Points: 260,924, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 85.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second Class50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteran
    Awards:
    Community Award
    Captain Obvious's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    117923
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    40,412
    Points
    260,924
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    12,802
    Thanked 15,359x in 10,977 Posts
    Mentioned
    563 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    1223
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    Thought I did, the electoral college give states a modicum of power over a populist, nationalist vote.

    I don't see it as political one way or another. According to this, Electoral College vs. popular vote splits, it has favored Reps over Dems:

    Remember, I'm the guy sees no difference between the duopolistic parties.

    To me it's simply a matter of where power resides, in the states, a federalist system, as it was designed, or the central government, a federal system, which changing it from electoral to popular wound nudge us toward.
    Then it's more of a symbol of states rights than any other effective measure against something unwanted.

    I still don't see a rational argument for it.


  7. #27
    tPF Moderator
    V.I.P
    Points: 224,018, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Chris's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    41599
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    62,344
    Points
    224,018
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    4,720
    Thanked 12,531x in 9,699 Posts
    Mentioned
    738 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    481
    Quote Originally Posted by Captain Obvious View Post
    Then it's more of a symbol of states rights than any other effective measure against something unwanted.

    I still don't see a rational argument for it.
    What's wanted, by me, of course, is to conserve republican federalism against an encroaching populist, democratic, federal government. (Note not Republican v Democratic but repulican v democratic.)

    Best I can explain I guess.

  8. #28

    tPF Moderator
    Original Ranter
    V.I.P
    Points: 334,162, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.8%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Peter1469's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    90999
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    64,967
    Points
    334,162
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    31,615
    Thanked 22,841x in 16,526 Posts
    Mentioned
    1433 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    977
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    Removing the electoral college would have the same effect as the 17th amendment on senate elections, move us away from the modicum of state's rights we have left toward ever more populist, majoritarianism.
    Yes.

    The EC is just another one of the many checks and balances created with our Constitution. We are not a democracy.

  9. #29

    tPF Moderator
    Original Ranter
    V.I.P
    Points: 334,162, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.8%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Peter1469's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    90999
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    64,967
    Points
    334,162
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    31,615
    Thanked 22,841x in 16,526 Posts
    Mentioned
    1433 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    977
    Quote Originally Posted by Captain Obvious View Post
    Except for a few instances, you do realize that for the most part that concept is superfluous, no?

    90-some percent of the time the popular vote goes with the electoral vote. It came close this election, but that correlation still maintained.

    Having said that, I still don't understand the concept of the facade of "states rights" when at the end of the day votes are paralleling electoral votes. Stating it the other way, I don't see a benefit of having an electoral college - what does it protect elections from (or defend them from)?
    But with no EC, presidential candidates would simply ignore all but the major population centers.

  10. #30
    Original Ranter
    Points: 260,924, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 85.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second Class50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteran
    Awards:
    Community Award
    Captain Obvious's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    117923
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    40,412
    Points
    260,924
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    12,802
    Thanked 15,359x in 10,977 Posts
    Mentioned
    563 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    1223
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    But with no EC, presidential candidates would simply ignore all but the major population centers.
    So?


+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Forum Topsite Critical Acclaim
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO