Ttfn

[GrassrootsConservative]

He was the best alternative for the job in 2008, and the best choice for the job in 2012.

THEN WHY DID HE HAVE TO CHEAT? TELL ME THAT. WHY DID HE HAVE TO HAVE YOUR BLACK PANTHER PALS SHOW UP AT POLLING PLACES TO INTIMIDATE ROMNEY SUPPORTERS? You tell me that, if he was the best choice for 2012 then how come we couldn't have a fair election?

[shaarona]

Perhaps some do, and some of "YOU" are threatening Romney's life while at the same time calling his supporters racists.
What's your point?

Yeah, "squandering". That's what I call it when the nation that built you puts you in charge and you waste trillions of her tax dollars, set race relations back half a century with small minded division tactics and seek to bring her under the jurisdiction of foreign, world organizations with track records of NOT having America's best interest at heart.

If anyone is threatening Romney's life, you should report it to your nearest US Secret Service Office.. You can find it in government blue pages in your phone book.... Or, cut the crap.

[Chris]

He was the best alternative for the job in 2008, and the best choice for the job in 2012.

In 2008, everyone but the family pet was pretty much fed up with the Bush administration's policies and the direction the economy was headed. A Democratic win was not too tough to call. In 2012, the GOP nominated a weak opponent who headed up a rocky and uneven campaign. He may have won 10, 15 years ago when national demographics were different...

It should really be no surprise to anyone who is willing to think objectively about this. The GOP has 4 years now to work on their brand. Good luck to them. The only way this country really wins with this two party system is for both parties to be strong and well-structured.

He won, true, but that doesn't make him the best choice (nor would Romney have been).

[GrassrootsConservative]

He won, true, but that doesn't make him the best choice (nor would Romney have been).

He didn't win. He cheated. Go see my post about Obama needing to give up office. The black panthers, Libtard propaganda at polling places. Obama would never have won a fair election. Look at his approval rating. Approval rating below 50% means most people want someone else in office.
Sorry. Obama didn't win.

[Chris]

He didn't win. He cheated. Go see my post about Obama needing to give up office. The black panthers, Libtard propaganda at polling places. Obama would never have won a fair election. Look at his approval rating. Approval rating below 50% means most people want someone else in office.
Sorry. Obama didn't win.

Read it. There's accusations on both sides. Let's see what comes out in the courts.

[truthmatters]

the republican party is in big trouble

[Chris]

the republican party is in big trouble

Agree, but for Democratic reasons. See if you can figure that out.

[Cigar]

I'm shutting down this computer for now and heading out. This may very well be my last post here (blessings for some of the true assholes on the forum). If the worst happens, I shall never return because the end of The Republic is really not something I fell like "chatting" about. And it will be the end if Obama wins. I sincerely wish everyone would understand that, but many people simply choose to ignore the reality that punches them right in the face.

If things go as I believe they will, I will likely be too drunk from celebrating to come back tonight and say hey, but tomorrow I will definitely pop in and celebrate a new chance to be the great nation we once were.

Barrack Obama did not ruin this country single-handed. We have been in a low slow boil for over a hundred years, with few men willing to stand up and do the right things. GW Bush is a decent man, but was not a conservative president, and his administration began the ball rolling for the Tea Party.

Cheers to the fast friends I have made here. Hope to see you again soon.

Ta Ta For Now,

-LD

Run Forest Run ... Chicken Little

[Peter1469]

He was the best alternative for the job in 2008, and the best choice for the job in 2012.

In 2008, everyone but the family pet was pretty much fed up with the Bush administration's policies and the direction the economy was headed. A Democratic win was not too tough to call. In 2012, the GOP nominated a weak opponent who headed up a rocky and uneven campaign. He may have won 10, 15 years ago when national demographics were different...

It should really be no surprise to anyone who is willing to think objectively about this. The GOP has 4 years now to work on their brand. Good luck to them. The only way this country really wins with this two party system is for both parties to be strong and well-structured.

There is nothing that the GOP can do with its "brand" other than to adopt various statist plans to satisfy disaffected groups. That doesn't solve anything; then we would have two statists parties arguing over who can better manage government entitlement programs. I say we let the Dems run with their statist programs; let them crash the economy and the USD, and see what happens after that. Elections have consequences. Enjoy them.

[Captain Obvious]

There is nothing that the GOP can do with its "brand" other than to adopt various statist plans to satisfy disaffected groups. That doesn't solve anything; then we would have two statists parties arguing over who can better manage government entitlement programs. I say we let the Dems run with their statist programs; let them crash the economy and the USD, and see what happens after that. Elections have consequences. Enjoy them.

Exactly.

Assimilate or stick around to sweep up the ashes.