JohnAdams:, it's been a little over three hours since your snotty and inaccurate message about impeachment. I'm still waiting for a rebuttal or some evidence you have to present to back up your idiocy.
But, don't despair. I'm not holding my breath.
JohnAdams:, it's been a little over three hours since your snotty and inaccurate message about impeachment. I'm still waiting for a rebuttal or some evidence you have to present to back up your idiocy.
But, don't despair. I'm not holding my breath.
did the American people just tell you they wanted Obama impeached?
you people are blind
Yes I may be pompous, in fact I know I can at times be downright so.
But at least I unlike you and your fellow liberals, knew better than to cast my vote for this assclown in the first place nitwit.
In fact had the liberal nitwits of your caliber done the same, four Americans wouldn't be dead in Benghazi, innocent Americans would not be sitting imprisoned for no other crime than that of criticizing islam in the United States, this Nation wouldn't have been taken to war unconstitutionally, and oh yeah, we wouldn't have a defense secretary who thinks it's the U.N. and not the Congress of the United States which has the power to delcare war.
Had nitwits of your caliber been pompous enough to see THE OBAMA for what THE OBAMA really is, we would not today be spending our great great great grandkids over the cliff.
Rushing to destroy, the longest lived, greatest, free Republic to ever exist in human history.
Pompous enough for ya there liberal jackass?
Last edited by JohnAdams; 11-07-2012 at 02:36 PM.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religiouspeople. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other. ~Still waiting to see one of you liberals demonstrate that "separation of church and state" is a concept that is actually enumerated in our Constitution.
And not just a liberal activist, legislate from the bench, fabrication.
Why should that matter?
Did what the people want matter in 2008 when the American people through their vote, as evidenced by the fact that it's no longer speaker Pelosi but rather speaker Boehner, rejected Obammycare?
No.
Furthermore, whether the people "like" this President or not, is irrelevant.
Whether he was just re-elected or not is irrelevant too.
He has broken our laws, and violated our Constitution. Note the period. (and note ladies and gents, these libbers do not even dispute that fact on the facts. As evidenced by the fact that they instead are making what are purely emotionally driven arguments as to why THE OBAMA should not be impeached.)
Why is it again he should be any different than any other citizen who breaks our laws?
Oh, thats right, because he's The Obama, and walks on water right libbers?
Last edited by JohnAdams; 11-07-2012 at 02:27 PM.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religiouspeople. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other. ~Still waiting to see one of you liberals demonstrate that "separation of church and state" is a concept that is actually enumerated in our Constitution.
And not just a liberal activist, legislate from the bench, fabrication.
If you slash funding for Embassy Security, you can hrdly blame the State Dept or Obama.
the cuts sought by Congress have been steep since the new House sat in 2011.The Worldwide Security Protection program (WSP), which the government says provides "core funding for the protection of life, property, and information of the Department of State," and a separate embassy security and construction budget, which in part improves fortifications, have both been under fire.
"In 2011 they came in and passed a continuing resolution for the remainder of that fiscal year. The House proposed $70 million cut in the WSP and they proposed a $204 million cut in Embassy security," says Mr. Lilly. "Then the next year, fiscal 2012, they cut worldwide security by $145 million and embassy security by $376 million. This year's bill is the same thing all over again. The House has cut the worldwide security budget $149 million below the request."
Roughly 260 installations
That's not the actual budget – simply the negotiating position of Congress. The Senate and the President have sought more money than the House for embassy security, but the horse-trading means that the State Department ends up with less than it requested. For instance, in the fiscal 2012 budget, the cuts over the State Departments' request were "whittled back by the Senate," he says, to $109 million for WSP and $131 million for embassy security.
"We've got something like 260 embassies and consulates around the world, and there's a remarkable number of them that aren't anywhere close to Inman standards and are still particularly dangerous," says Lilly. "Inman standards" refers to the report written by Admiral Bobby Ray Inman on US building security abroad after the 1983 Marine barracks bombing in Beirut that left 241 US troops and 58 French soldiers dead.
Nearly 30 years later, many US missions abroad don't meet the code.
http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Backc...udget/(page)/2
Shaarona, we are well aware that for some people you can never, ever, dare blame President Obama for anything.
Not going to happen, John. Too many remember how Clinton turned that on them.
Obama may well be impeached over Benghazi- and he certainly should be. But the Senate would never convict him since the Senate is corrupt.
roadmaster (11-07-2012)