As I said before, the City is acting in a discriminatory fashion. It cannot discriminate against religious beliefs. It can demand that its licensees not discriminate as a condition of that license, but it cannot hold religious views against an individual. The City is violating the Constitution. I don't believe that East Lansing sought legal advice or credible legal advice before passing a law that both violates the Home Rule City Act and embarks on a path of religious discrimination in order to avoid discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. The farmer's land is his home. It is not subject to public accommodation laws. One is free to practice their faith at home and pick and choose invitees, paying or not. The City should lose this suit. In fact, the state should be interceding at this point and putting East Lansing on notice of its overreach.