User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 32

Thread: The Compromise Thread

  1. #21
    Points: 31,531, Level: 43
    Level completed: 35%, Points required for next Level: 919
    Overall activity: 88.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registeredOverdrive25000 Experience Points
    exotix's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    5558
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Starz Fall on Alabama !
    Posts
    5,593
    Points
    31,531
    Level
    43
    Thanks Given
    254
    Thanked 407x in 354 Posts
    Mentioned
    104 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    62
    I hear the Supreme Court is taking up a Bill to allow voter-suppression ... what would be the equitable compromise ?


    I'm so proud it's coming from my state ... the birthplace of voting rights ...



    Supreme Court Review Puts Voting Rights Act in Jeopardy After Election Proves Its Necessity

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/doug-k...b_2104648.html

    http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2...ghts-case?lite

    Agreeing to hear another important case on race in America, the Supreme Court said Friday it will take up a battle over a key part of the landmark Voting Rights Act. Civil rights groups fear the court will use this case to gut the law.

    Passed by Congress in 1965 and renewed four times since then, most recently in 2006, a key provision requires states with a history of discrimination at the polls to get federal permission before making any changes to election procedures -- from redrawing congressional district boundaries to changing the locations of polling places.

    The law was at the core of the legal cases this year blocking strict new voter ID laws in Texas and South Carolina.

    Shelby County, Ala., claims the pre-clearance requirement -- which currently covers nine entire states, 12 cities and 57 counties elsewhere -- is unconstitutional.


  2. The Following User Says Thank You to exotix For This Useful Post:

    PatriotNews (11-09-2012)

  3. #22
    Points: 47,294, Level: 53
    Level completed: 14%, Points required for next Level: 1,556
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Social25000 Experience Points1 year registeredRecommendation Second Class
    oceanloverOH's Avatar Not available
    Karma
    18924
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    5,609
    Points
    47,294
    Level
    53
    Thanks Given
    2,065
    Thanked 2,722x in 1,890 Posts
    Mentioned
    310 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    196
    Quote Originally Posted by PatriotNews View Post
    Here are the compromises I have proposed. I have seen conservatives and republicans who are willing to go along, but no democrats. Let me know if you would agree with any of these, or propose your own.

    1) Before we raise the debt limit, we must pass a Balanced Budget Amendment.
    2) We agree to raise taxes on the rich if you agree to repeal the Affordable Care Act.
    3) We agree to comprehensive immigration reform including amnesty for all non-felons effective only after we have secured our borders and done a complete census of all illegal aliens followed by a moratorium on legal immigration for 10 years.
    4) A Same Sex Marriage/Right to Life Amendment to the US Constitution (with an exemption clause for religious institutions).
    5) A secure and standard voter registration and identification system for national elections. No open primaries. Rotate state primary schedules.
    Please add to the list.
    Sorry, PN, I was so busy with getting Obamacare out on the table, I forgot to address your suggestions. #3 and #5 are absolutely excellent suggestions....and IMO quite do-able.
    I think Sheriff Joe Arapiao of Phoenix should be in charge of #3....

  4. #23
    Points: 47,768, Level: 53
    Level completed: 40%, Points required for next Level: 1,082
    Overall activity: 39.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdrive25000 Experience Points1 year registered
    GrassrootsConservative's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    10543
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Alliance, NE
    Posts
    8,804
    Points
    47,768
    Level
    53
    Thanks Given
    4,458
    Thanked 2,356x in 1,763 Posts
    Mentioned
    48 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    115
    Quote Originally Posted by PatriotNews View Post
    I know that many people have died trafficing marijuana. It is not a harmless drug. This issue doesn't belong in this thread because republicans and democrats are for and against it. This is about republicans and democrats compromising.
    Why should we compromise with frauds, criminals, dictators and communists who want to run the entire country? We shouldn't be compromising with them, we should have defeated them.
    7,500 Drones In U.S. Airspace Within 5 Years:
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...ss-drone-regs/

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZKKNSpV0ME
    :
    "We respect and have a whole bunch of safeguards in terms of how we conduct counter-terrorism operations outside of the United States. The rules outside of the United States are going to be different than the rules inside of the United States."
    - Barack Hussein Obama


    That means
    NO safeguards.

  5. #24
    Points: 47,294, Level: 53
    Level completed: 14%, Points required for next Level: 1,556
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Social25000 Experience Points1 year registeredRecommendation Second Class
    oceanloverOH's Avatar Not available
    Karma
    18924
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    5,609
    Points
    47,294
    Level
    53
    Thanks Given
    2,065
    Thanked 2,722x in 1,890 Posts
    Mentioned
    310 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    196
    C'mon you guys....we have 4 years that we need to try to get along; sour grapes and namecalling won't get a damn thing done.

    I disagree, CJ....I think talking things out, and coming up with solutions that satisfy at least some of the needs of each party, IS the American way. Note that I did NOT say ass-kissing, or total capitulation. I think both parties, overall, have it in them to be reasonable and work for AMERICA.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to oceanloverOH For This Useful Post:

    KC (11-09-2012)

  7. #25
    Points: 723, Level: 5
    Level completed: 87%, Points required for next Level: 27
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    3 months registered500 Experience Points
    PatriotNews's Avatar Junior Member
    Karma
    179
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    42
    Points
    723
    Level
    5
    Thanks Given
    6
    Thanked 21x in 15 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    3
    Just saw this video for the first time so thought this is a good thread to post it in.


  8. The Following User Says Thank You to PatriotNews For This Useful Post:

    countryboy (11-09-2012)

  9. #26
    Points: 723, Level: 5
    Level completed: 87%, Points required for next Level: 27
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    3 months registered500 Experience Points
    PatriotNews's Avatar Junior Member
    Karma
    179
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    42
    Points
    723
    Level
    5
    Thanks Given
    6
    Thanked 21x in 15 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by exotix View Post
    I hear the Supreme Court is taking up a Bill to allow voter-suppression ... what would be the equitable compromise ?


    I'm so proud it's coming from my state ... the birthplace of voting rights ...



    Supreme Court Review Puts Voting Rights Act in Jeopardy After Election Proves Its Necessity

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/doug-k...b_2104648.html

    http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2...ghts-case?lite

    Agreeing to hear another important case on race in America, the Supreme Court said Friday it will take up a battle over a key part of the landmark Voting Rights Act. Civil rights groups fear the court will use this case to gut the law.

    Passed by Congress in 1965 and renewed four times since then, most recently in 2006, a key provision requires states with a history of discrimination at the polls to get federal permission before making any changes to election procedures -- from redrawing congressional district boundaries to changing the locations of polling places.

    The law was at the core of the legal cases this year blocking strict new voter ID laws in Texas and South Carolina.

    Shelby County, Ala., claims the pre-clearance requirement -- which currently covers nine entire states, 12 cities and 57 counties elsewhere -- is unconstitutional.

    I don't think the Voting Rights Act addresses the issue of voter ID. I don't see how voter ID laws "gut" the Voting Rights Act. All the states are still required to meet the requirements of the Voting Rights Act with or without voter ID laws. It is a separate issue.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to PatriotNews For This Useful Post:

    KC (11-09-2012)

  11. #27
    V.I.P
    Points: 47,836, Level: 53
    Level completed: 44%, Points required for next Level: 1,014
    Overall activity: 65.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupCreated Album picturesTagger First Class25000 Experience Points1 year registered
    KC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    13462
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Wisconsin, USA
    Posts
    7,114
    Points
    47,836
    Level
    53
    Thanks Given
    3,268
    Thanked 2,726x in 1,973 Posts
    Mentioned
    191 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    143
    Quote Originally Posted by PatriotNews View Post
    I don't think the Voting Rights Act addresses the issue of voter ID. I don't see how voter ID laws "gut" the Voting Rights Act. All the states are still required to meet the requirements of the Voting Rights Act with or without voter ID laws. It is a separate issue.
    You're right. In fact, this is one of the few issues where the right can point to laws and customs internationally. Voter ID laws are present in most liberal democracies, and they aren't used to suppress the vote. In fact many of the countries that require voter ID actually have higher average voter turnout rates than the US.
    The things I tell you will not be wrong.


  12. #28
    Points: 47,768, Level: 53
    Level completed: 40%, Points required for next Level: 1,082
    Overall activity: 39.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdrive25000 Experience Points1 year registered
    GrassrootsConservative's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    10543
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Alliance, NE
    Posts
    8,804
    Points
    47,768
    Level
    53
    Thanks Given
    4,458
    Thanked 2,356x in 1,763 Posts
    Mentioned
    48 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    115
    I can read just fine when I am stoned, I know you're not talking to/about me, but I'm just saying.
    I would like to be able to smoke marijuana, so if you could work that into your compromise somehow, that'd be great.
    You asked for input, that's my input.
    7,500 Drones In U.S. Airspace Within 5 Years:
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...ss-drone-regs/

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZKKNSpV0ME
    :
    "We respect and have a whole bunch of safeguards in terms of how we conduct counter-terrorism operations outside of the United States. The rules outside of the United States are going to be different than the rules inside of the United States."
    - Barack Hussein Obama


    That means
    NO safeguards.

  13. #29
    Points: 723, Level: 5
    Level completed: 87%, Points required for next Level: 27
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    3 months registered500 Experience Points
    PatriotNews's Avatar Junior Member
    Karma
    179
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    42
    Points
    723
    Level
    5
    Thanks Given
    6
    Thanked 21x in 15 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by GrassrootsConservative View Post
    I can read just fine when I am stoned, I know you're not talking to/about me, but I'm just saying.
    I would like to be able to smoke marijuana, so if you could work that into your compromise somehow, that'd be great.
    You asked for input, that's my input.
    Yeah, I'm sorry. I deleted that one because I was being snide. But I don't see how marijuana does fit into this discussion.

  14. #30
    Points: 15,460, Level: 30
    Level completed: 1%, Points required for next Level: 990
    Overall activity: 20.0%
    Achievements:
    Social1 year registered10000 Experience Points
    countryboy's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    4936
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    2,900
    Points
    15,460
    Level
    30
    Thanks Given
    865
    Thanked 774x in 595 Posts
    Mentioned
    56 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    53
    Quote Originally Posted by PatriotNews View Post
    I know that many people have died trafficing marijuana. It is not a harmless drug. This issue doesn't belong in this thread because republicans and democrats are for and against it. This is about republicans and democrats compromising.
    The only reason people have died is because it is illegal. Legalize and you instantly remove the criminal element.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to countryboy For This Useful Post:

    GrassrootsConservative (11-09-2012)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Linksgrower Forum Topsite Critical Acclaim
Top Ron Paul Sites - Ranking the best Ron Paul related Freedom and Liberty Websites
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO