User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 32

Thread: The Compromise Thread

  1. #21
    Points: 49,388, Level: 54
    Level completed: 30%, Points required for next Level: 1,262
    Overall activity: 59.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registeredOverdrive25000 Experience Points
    exotix's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    8905
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Starz Fall on Alabama !
    Posts
    8,460
    Points
    49,388
    Level
    54
    Thanks Given
    634
    Thanked 871x in 738 Posts
    Mentioned
    298 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    99
    I hear the Supreme Court is taking up a Bill to allow voter-suppression ... what would be the equitable compromise ?


    I'm so proud it's coming from my state ... the birthplace of voting rights ...



    Supreme Court Review Puts Voting Rights Act in Jeopardy After Election Proves Its Necessity

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/doug-k...b_2104648.html

    http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2...ghts-case?lite

    Agreeing to hear another important case on race in America, the Supreme Court said Friday it will take up a battle over a key part of the landmark Voting Rights Act. Civil rights groups fear the court will use this case to gut the law.

    Passed by Congress in 1965 and renewed four times since then, most recently in 2006, a key provision requires states with a history of discrimination at the polls to get federal permission before making any changes to election procedures -- from redrawing congressional district boundaries to changing the locations of polling places.

    The law was at the core of the legal cases this year blocking strict new voter ID laws in Texas and South Carolina.

    Shelby County, Ala., claims the pre-clearance requirement -- which currently covers nine entire states, 12 cities and 57 counties elsewhere -- is unconstitutional.


  2. The Following User Says Thank You to exotix For This Useful Post:

    PatriotNews (11-09-2012)

  3. #22
    Points: 50,316, Level: 54
    Level completed: 82%, Points required for next Level: 334
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Social1 year registeredRecommendation Second Class50000 Experience Points
    oceanloverOH's Avatar Not available
    Karma
    19410
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    5,623
    Points
    50,316
    Level
    54
    Thanks Given
    2,065
    Thanked 2,741x in 1,897 Posts
    Mentioned
    320 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    201
    Quote Originally Posted by PatriotNews View Post
    Here are the compromises I have proposed. I have seen conservatives and republicans who are willing to go along, but no democrats. Let me know if you would agree with any of these, or propose your own.

    1) Before we raise the debt limit, we must pass a Balanced Budget Amendment.
    2) We agree to raise taxes on the rich if you agree to repeal the Affordable Care Act.
    3) We agree to comprehensive immigration reform including amnesty for all non-felons effective only after we have secured our borders and done a complete census of all illegal aliens followed by a moratorium on legal immigration for 10 years.
    4) A Same Sex Marriage/Right to Life Amendment to the US Constitution (with an exemption clause for religious institutions).
    5) A secure and standard voter registration and identification system for national elections. No open primaries. Rotate state primary schedules.
    Please add to the list.
    Sorry, PN, I was so busy with getting Obamacare out on the table, I forgot to address your suggestions. #3 and #5 are absolutely excellent suggestions....and IMO quite do-able.
    I think Sheriff Joe Arapiao of Phoenix should be in charge of #3....

  4. #23
    Points: 56,844, Level: 58
    Level completed: 25%, Points required for next Level: 1,506
    Overall activity: 29.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdrive1 year registered50000 Experience Points
    GrassrootsConservative's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    12093
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Alliance, NE
    Posts
    9,972
    Points
    56,844
    Level
    58
    Thanks Given
    5,935
    Thanked 2,782x in 2,077 Posts
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    131
    Quote Originally Posted by PatriotNews View Post
    I know that many people have died trafficing marijuana. It is not a harmless drug. This issue doesn't belong in this thread because republicans and democrats are for and against it. This is about republicans and democrats compromising.
    Why should we compromise with frauds, criminals, dictators and communists who want to run the entire country? We shouldn't be compromising with them, we should have defeated them.
    7,500 Drones In U.S. Airspace Within 5 Years:
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...ss-drone-regs/

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZKKNSpV0ME
    :
    "We respect and have a whole bunch of safeguards in terms of how we conduct counter-terrorism operations outside of the United States. The rules outside of the United States are going to be different than the rules inside of the United States."
    - Barack Hussein Obama


    That means
    NO safeguards.

  5. #24
    Points: 50,316, Level: 54
    Level completed: 82%, Points required for next Level: 334
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Social1 year registeredRecommendation Second Class50000 Experience Points
    oceanloverOH's Avatar Not available
    Karma
    19410
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    5,623
    Points
    50,316
    Level
    54
    Thanks Given
    2,065
    Thanked 2,741x in 1,897 Posts
    Mentioned
    320 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    201
    C'mon you guys....we have 4 years that we need to try to get along; sour grapes and namecalling won't get a damn thing done.

    I disagree, CJ....I think talking things out, and coming up with solutions that satisfy at least some of the needs of each party, IS the American way. Note that I did NOT say ass-kissing, or total capitulation. I think both parties, overall, have it in them to be reasonable and work for AMERICA.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to oceanloverOH For This Useful Post:

    KC (11-09-2012)

  7. #25
    Points: 723, Level: 5
    Level completed: 87%, Points required for next Level: 27
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    3 months registered500 Experience Points
    PatriotNews's Avatar Junior Member
    Karma
    179
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    42
    Points
    723
    Level
    5
    Thanks Given
    6
    Thanked 21x in 15 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    4
    Just saw this video for the first time so thought this is a good thread to post it in.


  8. The Following User Says Thank You to PatriotNews For This Useful Post:

    countryboy (11-09-2012)

  9. #26
    Points: 723, Level: 5
    Level completed: 87%, Points required for next Level: 27
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    3 months registered500 Experience Points
    PatriotNews's Avatar Junior Member
    Karma
    179
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    42
    Points
    723
    Level
    5
    Thanks Given
    6
    Thanked 21x in 15 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by exotix View Post
    I hear the Supreme Court is taking up a Bill to allow voter-suppression ... what would be the equitable compromise ?


    I'm so proud it's coming from my state ... the birthplace of voting rights ...



    Supreme Court Review Puts Voting Rights Act in Jeopardy After Election Proves Its Necessity

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/doug-k...b_2104648.html

    http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2...ghts-case?lite

    Agreeing to hear another important case on race in America, the Supreme Court said Friday it will take up a battle over a key part of the landmark Voting Rights Act. Civil rights groups fear the court will use this case to gut the law.

    Passed by Congress in 1965 and renewed four times since then, most recently in 2006, a key provision requires states with a history of discrimination at the polls to get federal permission before making any changes to election procedures -- from redrawing congressional district boundaries to changing the locations of polling places.

    The law was at the core of the legal cases this year blocking strict new voter ID laws in Texas and South Carolina.

    Shelby County, Ala., claims the pre-clearance requirement -- which currently covers nine entire states, 12 cities and 57 counties elsewhere -- is unconstitutional.

    I don't think the Voting Rights Act addresses the issue of voter ID. I don't see how voter ID laws "gut" the Voting Rights Act. All the states are still required to meet the requirements of the Voting Rights Act with or without voter ID laws. It is a separate issue.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to PatriotNews For This Useful Post:

    KC (11-09-2012)

  11. #27
    V.I.P
    Points: 60,759, Level: 60
    Level completed: 21%, Points required for next Level: 1,591
    Overall activity: 29.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupCreated Album picturesTagger First Class1 year registered50000 Experience Points
    KC's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    18837
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Wisconsin, USA
    Posts
    8,576
    Points
    60,759
    Level
    60
    Thanks Given
    4,066
    Thanked 3,715x in 2,634 Posts
    Mentioned
    254 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    199
    Quote Originally Posted by PatriotNews View Post
    I don't think the Voting Rights Act addresses the issue of voter ID. I don't see how voter ID laws "gut" the Voting Rights Act. All the states are still required to meet the requirements of the Voting Rights Act with or without voter ID laws. It is a separate issue.
    You're right. In fact, this is one of the few issues where the right can point to laws and customs internationally. Voter ID laws are present in most liberal democracies, and they aren't used to suppress the vote. In fact many of the countries that require voter ID actually have higher average voter turnout rates than the US.
    Quidquid Latine dictum sit altum videtur

  12. #28
    Points: 56,844, Level: 58
    Level completed: 25%, Points required for next Level: 1,506
    Overall activity: 29.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdrive1 year registered50000 Experience Points
    GrassrootsConservative's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    12093
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Alliance, NE
    Posts
    9,972
    Points
    56,844
    Level
    58
    Thanks Given
    5,935
    Thanked 2,782x in 2,077 Posts
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    131
    I can read just fine when I am stoned, I know you're not talking to/about me, but I'm just saying.
    I would like to be able to smoke marijuana, so if you could work that into your compromise somehow, that'd be great.
    You asked for input, that's my input.
    7,500 Drones In U.S. Airspace Within 5 Years:
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...ss-drone-regs/

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZKKNSpV0ME
    :
    "We respect and have a whole bunch of safeguards in terms of how we conduct counter-terrorism operations outside of the United States. The rules outside of the United States are going to be different than the rules inside of the United States."
    - Barack Hussein Obama


    That means
    NO safeguards.

  13. #29
    Points: 723, Level: 5
    Level completed: 87%, Points required for next Level: 27
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    3 months registered500 Experience Points
    PatriotNews's Avatar Junior Member
    Karma
    179
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    42
    Points
    723
    Level
    5
    Thanks Given
    6
    Thanked 21x in 15 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by GrassrootsConservative View Post
    I can read just fine when I am stoned, I know you're not talking to/about me, but I'm just saying.
    I would like to be able to smoke marijuana, so if you could work that into your compromise somehow, that'd be great.
    You asked for input, that's my input.
    Yeah, I'm sorry. I deleted that one because I was being snide. But I don't see how marijuana does fit into this discussion.

  14. #30
    V.I.P
    Points: 21,629, Level: 35
    Level completed: 74%, Points required for next Level: 321
    Overall activity: 26.0%
    Achievements:
    Social1 year registered10000 Experience Points
    countryboy's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    7722
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    3,984
    Points
    21,629
    Level
    35
    Thanks Given
    1,139
    Thanked 1,127x in 856 Posts
    Mentioned
    98 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    82
    Quote Originally Posted by PatriotNews View Post
    I know that many people have died trafficing marijuana. It is not a harmless drug. This issue doesn't belong in this thread because republicans and democrats are for and against it. This is about republicans and democrats compromising.
    The only reason people have died is because it is illegal. Legalize and you instantly remove the criminal element.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to countryboy For This Useful Post:

    GrassrootsConservative (11-09-2012)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Forum Topsite Critical Acclaim
Top Ron Paul Sites - Ranking the best Ron Paul related Freedom and Liberty Websites
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO