User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Liberalism & the law

  1. #1
    Points: 665,289, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 85.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433316
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    197,553
    Points
    665,289
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    31,984
    Thanked 80,905x in 54,720 Posts
    Mentioned
    2011 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Liberalism & the law

    The following article is written by Hadley Arkes who has written such wroks as First Things: An Inquiry Into the First Principles of Morals and Justice, Beyond the Constitution and Natural Rights and the Right to Choose. He is perhaps the best modern author on natural law and rights.

    I tried to keep this to the bare minimum. It should be read in its entirety, and completely for it goes on much further.

    Liberalism & the law

    Before there was a law under the American Constitution, there was an argument about the law. It was an argument, that is, about the ends of the law, and the framework of a lawful government. This was, of course, the argument over the Constitution, and it seems remarkably to have escaped recognition these days that an argument of this kind is itself a dramatic illustration of “natural law.”...

    As John Locke pointed out, the legislature would be the source of the “positive law,” the law that was enacted or posited. But what, he asked, would be the source of the legislature? From what would that spring?...

    ...The law in England, made familiar by William Blackstone in his Commentaries, began with the notion of a sovereign issuing commands. But the law in America, said Wilson, would begin “with another principle, very different in its nature and operations”: “Laws derived from the pure source of equality and justice must be founded on the consent of those, whose obedience they require. The sovereign, when traced to his source, must be found in the man.”

    The appeal then had to be to those first principles “antecedent to all positive law,” an appeal to “nature”—or, as Aristotle would say, to an understanding of that creature who was by nature suited to political life....

    In ... Chisholm v. Georgia, James Wilson ... found it necessary to speak about “the principles of general jurisprudence” and to acknowledge the laws of reason and “the philosophy of mind.” And so, before Wilson invoked the authority of any case at law or any commentator on matters jural, he invoked the authority of “Dr. [Thomas] Reid, in his excellent inquiry into the human mind, on the principles of common sense, speaking of the skeptical and illiberal philosophy, which under bold, but false pretensions to liberality, prevailed in many parts of Europe before he wrote.” Wilson began, then, by rejecting skepticism as the fount of all forms of relativism in morality and law.

    As a contrast ...in Planned Parenthood v. Casey in 1992 ... Justices Sandra Day O’Connor, Anthony Kennedy, and David Souter wrote a plurality opinion in which they enjoined the country to cease its agitation over this issue. In restating the claim for a right to abortion, the three judges sought to soar to a level poetic, and delivered themselves of this profundity: “at the heart of liberty is the right to define one’s own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life.” The founders began by rejecting skepticism and relativism in philosophy and morality; the modern judges—products of the best law schools in the land—affirm the right of a person to make up his own version of the universe.

  2. #2
    Points: 64,696, Level: 62
    Level completed: 12%, Points required for next Level: 1,854
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranSocial
    texan's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    32859
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    12,672
    Points
    64,696
    Level
    62
    Thanks Given
    3,512
    Thanked 5,749x in 3,852 Posts
    Mentioned
    125 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Liberalism is now just socialism. Oh and everyone gets a trophy.
    I am tired of everyone fighting with each other. This is all by design.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to texan For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (07-16-2017)

  4. #3
    Points: 5,943, Level: 18
    Level completed: 33%, Points required for next Level: 407
    Overall activity: 0.0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Mechanic's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    24412
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Posts
    416
    Points
    5,943
    Level
    18
    Thanks Given
    491
    Thanked 99x in 75 Posts
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Funny thing that law. So well defined and written. Then a new interpretation of what is meant comes along and screws it all up for conservatives. Or is it just that the southern conservative just knows so much that just isn't true? As Ronnie about that.

  5. #4
    Points: 665,289, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 85.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433316
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    197,553
    Points
    665,289
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    31,984
    Thanked 80,905x in 54,720 Posts
    Mentioned
    2011 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by texan View Post
    Liberalism is now just socialism. Oh and everyone gets a trophy.
    Arkes is talking about liberalism in the classical sense and its universal morality and comparing it to liberalism in the modern with its moral relativism.

  6. #5
    Points: 665,289, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 85.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433316
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    197,553
    Points
    665,289
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    31,984
    Thanked 80,905x in 54,720 Posts
    Mentioned
    2011 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mechanic View Post
    Funny thing that law. So well defined and written. Then a new interpretation of what is meant comes along and screws it all up for conservatives. Or is it just that the southern conservative just knows so much that just isn't true? As Ronnie about that.
    This has little to do with contemporary politics.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts